I do not support high density zoning as we do not have the infrastructure to support that decision. Please do. It move forward with changing the zoning and it should remain low density if nothing at all.
C
Cindy Gamber
5 years ago
Please do not allow this resining. Our streets and infrastructure cannot handle the additional traffic. Our neighborhood roads are already strained with the growth we are experiencing with Glacier Estates. Rezoning will do great damage to our community.
S
Shannon Anderson
5 years ago
No to rezoning to higher density!
J
Jill Holt
5 years ago
The existing roads and infrastructure cannot support medium or high density housing. Initial studies show these small residential roads will be unsafe and over loaded with this type of urban growth. Deny the proposal to re-zone.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
As a new resident of Greenleaf, I am opposed to rezoning an adjoining undeveloped area to a high density residential area. This would have a significant negative impact on traffic on Lowell-Larimer and the hill coming down from Seattle Hill Road. Clearly whomever is attempting to increase this development from low density to high or even moderate density has not traveled down Seattle hill to Lowell Larimer at the beginning or end of school days or during rush hours. There is already a significant backup and Lowell larimer would not support additional vehicles…it doesn’t even seem to be intended for the amount of cars currently. People move to this area for the low home density, larger lots and peaceful farm like atmosphere. Please uphold that standard and don’t ruin the atmosphere & accessibility for current residents by allowing a high or moderate density residential development to be built adjoining to any of these neighborhoods.
L
Lon Biasco
5 years ago
The hillside and ravines cannot support more water runoff into the streams and into the valley. Either option should be denied and stayed at Low density consistent to the neighborhood it connects to or touches. You are impeding on the floodplain and runoff impacts in the valley. Creating more pollution on our farmers too.
R
Rhonda Smith
5 years ago
I oppose the re-zoning to high density.
G
George Ramsdell
6 years ago
No to rezoning. We already have too much traffic.
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
Re-zoning this land will have negative impacts to the houses in the nearby neighborhoods, the streets are not designed to handle this increase traffic. It also does not align with the developments built in this area (residential houses and farmland)
S
Shannon Pratt
6 years ago
No to rezoning
D
Darren Pratt
6 years ago
No to rezoning
J
Julia Martinez
6 years ago
please do not rezone for higher density housing.
K
Kathy Derks
6 years ago
We do not need multiple housing units around here and our roads are already over crowded with traffic:
D
David Hirschi
6 years ago
No to rezoning
P
Paige Hirschi
6 years ago
No to rezoning.
C
Curt Boyle
6 years ago
Not every neighborhood needs apartments.
K
Katie McCune
6 years ago
This change would have significant impacts to our local schools by increasing the crowding. We don’t have the local road infrastructure to support more high density housing near highway 9 and along Cathcart/132nd. This community and county needs to consider impacts to current residents first. I do not support.
J
Julia Kopcak
6 years ago
I’m signing this in an effort to stop adding to our already overcrowded elementary school (Little Cedars Elementary). The kids are already forced into outside portables. The teachers are dealing with classes of around 30 kids. Adding high density housing will almost certainly exacerbate these problems.
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
I object rezoning to allow high density housing! please do not change this from the current zoning that is focused on family homes!
I do not support high density zoning as we do not have the infrastructure to support that decision. Please do. It move forward with changing the zoning and it should remain low density if nothing at all.
Please do not allow this resining. Our streets and infrastructure cannot handle the additional traffic. Our neighborhood roads are already strained with the growth we are experiencing with Glacier Estates. Rezoning will do great damage to our community.
No to rezoning to higher density!
The existing roads and infrastructure cannot support medium or high density housing. Initial studies show these small residential roads will be unsafe and over loaded with this type of urban growth. Deny the proposal to re-zone.
As a new resident of Greenleaf, I am opposed to rezoning an adjoining undeveloped area to a high density residential area. This would have a significant negative impact on traffic on Lowell-Larimer and the hill coming down from Seattle Hill Road. Clearly whomever is attempting to increase this development from low density to high or even moderate density has not traveled down Seattle hill to Lowell Larimer at the beginning or end of school days or during rush hours. There is already a significant backup and Lowell larimer would not support additional vehicles…it doesn’t even seem to be intended for the amount of cars currently. People move to this area for the low home density, larger lots and peaceful farm like atmosphere. Please uphold that standard and don’t ruin the atmosphere & accessibility for current residents by allowing a high or moderate density residential development to be built adjoining to any of these neighborhoods.
The hillside and ravines cannot support more water runoff into the streams and into the valley. Either option should be denied and stayed at Low density consistent to the neighborhood it connects to or touches. You are impeding on the floodplain and runoff impacts in the valley. Creating more pollution on our farmers too.
I oppose the re-zoning to high density.
No to rezoning. We already have too much traffic.
Re-zoning this land will have negative impacts to the houses in the nearby neighborhoods, the streets are not designed to handle this increase traffic. It also does not align with the developments built in this area (residential houses and farmland)
No to rezoning
No to rezoning
please do not rezone for higher density housing.
We do not need multiple housing units around here and our roads are already over crowded with traffic:
No to rezoning
No to rezoning.
Not every neighborhood needs apartments.
This change would have significant impacts to our local schools by increasing the crowding. We don’t have the local road infrastructure to support more high density housing near highway 9 and along Cathcart/132nd. This community and county needs to consider impacts to current residents first. I do not support.
I’m signing this in an effort to stop adding to our already overcrowded elementary school (Little Cedars Elementary). The kids are already forced into outside portables. The teachers are dealing with classes of around 30 kids. Adding high density housing will almost certainly exacerbate these problems.
I object rezoning to allow high density housing! please do not change this from the current zoning that is focused on family homes!
Please do not change the zoning!