Skip to main content

These "regulations" WILL be implemented unless we all speak up

15 Comments

L
larry jones
12 years ago Featured

when you hold us to the same standards as LA,or lower 48 levels then we can talk

E
Erica Whitledge
12 years ago Featured

As a single mother it is cheaper for me to harvest wood then pay for fuel. I currently and for the last several years only have a wood stove as my homes heating source. It is essential for me, as I am sure it is for others also, to be able to keep and use year round my wood stove.

K
Kenneth Adam McLeod
12 years ago

Leave the stoves alone

D
david richard luntz
12 years ago

leave the stoves and get rid of DEC

D
donald moreland
12 years ago

wood stoves in alaska, are different then lower 48. but much more nessasary. and are needed most when temparature are lowest. if the epa dec and bourough are really concered. then they need to do more to provide answers. like dry wood business or catalitic chimney converters. it would be better to come along side the people then to attack them. after all we are just trying to stay warm. the stove swap program was a joke and did not allow the average person to exchange. but at least was some effort. the best and cleanest and most efficent heat source, is electricity. but haigh cost and availability in bad weather make it unreliable. the fact that the utility gets away with legalize exstortion, does not help the issue. the fact is wood stoves are more reliable and efficentt and more praticle in fairbenks the small emission is not as harmfull as the advoctes would make it. monitoring is highly selected and designed to fail. besides, carbon dioxide is better then carbon monoxide. and mcdonalds puts out more polutent the the average wood stove.

L
Lori Wetherington
12 years ago

People should be allowed to burn responsible.

J
Jon Odsather
12 years ago

With out sounding too cliché, if you want my wood stove you'd better bring ATF with you becaus you'll have to try to take my gun at the same time!

R
Rod Pence
12 years ago

The Borough should NOT be involved in Any part of the implementation of the air quality control program

D
Dan Antonson
12 years ago

I am still waiting for the Natural Gas Line

M
Myrna McGhie
12 years ago

No, to the borough implementing this plan.

L
Lance Roberts
12 years ago Featured

The Borough should not be involved in the implementation of this plan. The State wants it, they should have to pay to implement it.

T
Terri Dukes
12 years ago

NO

C
Carl Eady
12 years ago

the regulations are for the ones who are going to take our money for their own selfish reasons

J
Jon Watts
12 years ago

Judged by pseudoscience? NEVER! A particle is more dangerous because it is smaller, without regard to toxicity? As spurious as the global warming (taxation) swindle!

J
Jeffery Hill Sr.
12 years ago

I vote no