We, Singaporean calling for the Government to setup a Committee of Inquiry (COI) to provide the full facts on 26 and 31 Ridout rental by 2 ministers

Agreed to have an independent inquiry must consist of public & civilians.

I demand accountability from the 2 Ministars

We demand one.

I'm most supportive for this Presidential COI for such Breached of COI = CONFLICT Of Interests involving the very Own Agency under his Direct Charge...!

Get to the bottom of it.

Set up a COI to provide fill details of this case. The public has the full rights to know the truth. If any negligence found, please do the right thing - Step Down and Resign.

There must be a transparency in this transactions. This gives confidence to Singapore governance !

Yes, we need transparency just as we need transparency of the numbers of people jnjured with the jabs. No more covering up!!

Transparency needed by independent parties

yes be truly democratic..stop the hypocrisy and autocracy!

We need transparent and why official has the privilege

We need justice and fairness to us Singaporean. No One is Above The Law

He suggested that the review should cover the followin as nicely pointed out by s’pore senior council Harper Singh pointed below: What processes the government has in place to deal with any actual or apparent conflicts of interest and how they were followed in this case; What were the reason(s) the Minister for Home Affairs and Law submitted his bid via an agent and did the SLA know that the minister was the ultimate principal behind the bid? If so, how, and when did the SLA come to know this? If not, how was the SLA to effectively abide by any protocols to avoid possible conflicts of interest without this information?; Did the SLA take independent advice from the Attorney General’s Chambers on the processes it should put in place to ensure a level playing field existed and to address any possible conflicts of interest? If not, what steps did the SLA take to properly address this?; Apart from not disclosing the guide rent, what steps did the SLA take to ensure that the ministers were not in any advantageous position over the world at large in relation to the rentals of both bungalows?; What is the recent history of the tenancies of both properties and under what circumstances did the previous tenants come to leave each property?; Why did both properties remain vacant for such an extended period before the leases to the ministers were granted? What steps did the SLA take to rent out the properties in that time?; The full costs of the renovations to each property and who bore them; The period for which each property was advertised and whether that period was adequate to secure properly competitive bids; The rent payable for each property, how that was derived and how it compares with market rent; The lease renewal terms for each property; and Were there any non-standard tenancy terms negotiated with either minister and, if so, what were those terms? Disclosure of copies of both tenancy agreements? Mr Singh emphasized that ideally, the review should di

We need transparent result . Why never let opposition knows the outcome at the same time so that they also can prepare for the debate

"Ownself review ownself" is not acceptable

Snr counsel from the Judicary should be chairing the investigation

That is the proper way to do

No comments

Transparency is paramount, especially for politicians.

They will most likely reject the findings of an independent inquiry, same as how they reject the findings of the Queen's council regarding JBJ, and subsequently changed the laws and allow only themselves to permit appeals to the privy council. Most critical issue, is that singaporeans open their eyes and mind