Skip to main content

The Court of Session has officially accepted our request for a judicial review regarding the referendum count. This outcome confirms that our insistence on procedural transparency was both necessary and correct. We must now remain vigilant as the legal proceedings begin to ensure the integrity of the process.

December 4, 2014

We demand a recount

We demand a recount

🏆 Won — 247 supporters Verified

Final supporters

C
Colleen M.
J
janice r.
S
Someone
M
Marion T.
J
Julie s.
A
A. B.
A
annmarie b.
N
nicole
K
Kristina s.
S
Someone
+237 more
AM
Started by Amy McDonald 11 years, 11 months ago
So the BBC lied to you, Scotland. It is true that the Referendum Bill of 2013 forbids the CHIEF COUNTING OFFICER from recounting votes after they have been declared. But it does not forbid anyone ELSE from recounting the votes and it gives any person in Scotland the power to request and receive the register of the votes. So…you may not be able to revote (this time around) but you can all ASK FOR AND RECEIVE the full tally of votes and see what the outcome really was. And….the votes have not yet been certified. They are certified six weeks from now. So the election is not actually legally 'over.' You can as you see 'bring proceedings for a petition of a judicial review' for the next five weeks.

You need to "apply to the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court of Session' to get a judicial review. And at this point we need to ask a Scottish barrister what exactly that means.

But Scotland -- your process is not over. They are trying to trick you in saying the process is over. That vote count only stands if it rests for six weeks without a petition for a judicial review. Please share widely. And remember -- every single one of you has the right to ask for the register of votes in your council and receive it to review it in a public place.

34Restriction on legal challenge to referendum result

(1)No court may entertain any proceedings for questioning the number of ballot papers counted or votes cast as certified by a counting officer or by the Chief Counting Officer under section 7(2)(b) or (as the case may be) (4) unless—
(a)the proceedings are brought by way of a petition for judicial review, and
(b)the petition is lodged before the end of the permitted period.
(2)In subsection (1)(b) “the permitted period” means the period of 6 weeks beginning with—
(a)the day on which the officer in question makes the certification as to the number of ballot papers counted and votes cast in the referendum, or
(b)if the officer makes more than one such certification, the day on which the last is made.
(3)In subsection (1), references to a petition for judicial review are references to an application to the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court of Session.

Updates

Reached 100 supporters

September 20, 2014

7 Comments

F
Fiona Weber
11 years ago Featured

THINGS DONT ADD UP. WE WERE ROBBED.

H
Hamish McBride
11 years ago Featured

Something smells fishy. We need to see the proof before they certify anything.

D
Dave Reddy
11 years ago Featured

Just recount the ballots. If we have the right to look then let us look.

C
Catriona Sharma
11 years ago Featured

I just want the truth. If it was fair then why are they acting so nervous?

A
Alastair Jenkins
11 years ago Featured

Too many people reporting funny business at the counting stations. check the numbers again.

N
Nicola Findlay
11 years ago Featured

We deserve a fare vote We deserve independence We deserve peace We deserve not to be intimidated by anyone We deserve to be free

A
Adil Ah
11 years ago

Need a fare voting system