Skip to main content

Want justice and an answer from IIM Lucknow

197 Comments

A
Arabinda Bhattacharjee
8 years ago

We want transparency against the toil for the entire year which we have invested

A
Anchal Gupta
8 years ago

Cat 2017 transparency

A
Anchal Gupta
8 years ago

Cat 2017 transparency

A
Aditya Goswami
8 years ago

So what does IIM mean? Its not a fair policy to reimburse your paper pattern by downscaling my marks.Please consider it, it may end someone's lyf.

A
Ankit mittal
8 years ago

Get less marks as expected and want to know the actual marks

S
Shreya Ghosh
8 years ago

There has been random downscaling/upscaling of marks. I had the morning slot and there has been downscaling of about 25-30 marks for sure.

D
DEBRUP SARKAR
8 years ago

MY SLOT IS 2.

G
Gursewak Ghumman
8 years ago

I too have got only 62 marks but I expected them to be above 110. I was very much shocked to see my results

P
Punit Pandey
8 years ago Featured

I have calculated my raw score as per CAT official key ,but my actual score varies a lot from that.I request you to please release answer sheet or find any other method to solve this issue.Futue of 1000 candidates are in danger

S
Shashwathi
8 years ago

Revaluation of CAT 2017 results

K
Kalpit jain
8 years ago

Let us see our raw score.

R
Reshab Kedia
8 years ago

Sir I was especting more then 125 but I got only 79.83

S
Shobhit gupta
8 years ago

Discrepancy in cat results

R
Roshan Khetade
8 years ago

Same happened with me expected raw score in worst scenario was 115 ended up with 101

S
Shlok agrawal
8 years ago

I feel like my quant score has been scaled down by a great margin.

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

Discrepancy in results when compared to the answer key

M
Munish Arora
8 years ago

I appeared in slot 1 and i expected 55 raw scores in Quant section and they gave me scaled scores 25

S
Sreeram K
8 years ago

I have got the same score I calculated . As i wrote in slot 1 the scores are supposed to get increased as it was the tougher slot.

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

I have achieved 50marks below what I have calculated, There is no clear cut process for the effective results

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

20 marks of variation! Dissapointed to the core!