We object to the grossly sexual and corrupting nature of the CVille NOW display in the front lobby display case in the Central Library of the Jefferson Madison Regional Library System in April of 2015. The nature of the display broke library policy of being “all age appropriate” and in no way “indicate[d] that all aspects of the issue be presented in an equal manner.” Its placement by the front doors, its proximity to the children’s section, the inability to exit the library without passing it, and the low height and glass sides of the case made it unavoidable to all patrons, most importantly children, visiting the library. The display’s presentation of women’s sexual education was in no way appropriate for the young children encountering it while visiting the library. The paraphernalia, including sexual devices, jokes, and images, were wholly disrespectful and incompatible with the library’s stated policy.
To say that children would not be able to see it and would not be interested is easily proven false by the facts that:
a) the case is known to often feature child-friendly fare (e.g., trains and, currently, stuffed sea creatures);
b) is low enough for two-year-olds to see inside;
c) was advertised in the front with a colorful rainbow cloth and a cartoon picture of animals;
d) the condoms inside were disguised as candy wrappers and soda cans;
e) several of the books used both in the case and, more prominently, on top would be interesting to children due to their bright colors and cartoons on their covers. Any child could take those books down and easily read their sexual content, including many slang words for sexual fetishes and encouragements to engage in sexual activities even if their parents disapprove.
We ask that future displays dealing with sex directly be excluded automatically as they cannot be “all age appropriate” by their nature. We are not for banning books in the library, and only ask that these books and related items with sexually explicit material not be openly displayed in the front of the library. We do expect the library to be inclusive of all patrons, including the youngest patrons and their families. We love and care about the JMRL system and want to ensure that displays with such a sexual nature do not happen again. We already live in a culture drowning with sexual images and dialogue, and we expect that a resource cherished by every community, the local library, will at least not undermine our challenging task of educating our children about deeply personal topics in the way we as parents see best. Sexual education has always been a unique topic in education, with all parents facing individual challenges related to their own families, and we would hope that the local library, of all places, will be a resource in the raising of our children, not an ideological force that any conscientious parent, of any philosophy, should have to avoid.
In response, we would like a public statement from the library director, John Halliday, addressing how this will be prevented in the future. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Updates
August 17, 2015
I am honestly overwhelmed by the response to this concern. It was never my intention to lead a cause but your collective focus has turned this into a real conversation about our library standards.
Reached 100 supporters
August 17, 2015
79 Comments
I hope the County sees the error of their ways and gets rid of this display. If someone were to approach a stranger's child with this information, they would be arrested and probably charged as a pedophile and forced to register ass a sex offender. Why is it okay for NOW to present it in this manner?
This is ABSOLUTELY OUTRAGEOUS. This is a topic for parents to discuss freely with their children, not for a library to put such a biased and unsanctioned by the parents who bring their children to the library display at children's level in plain view. I am extremely disappointed and disturbed by this.
I found this display to be offensive and inappropriate. I'm appalled that it was displayed where young children could see it. My four year old would be able to read it, so I imagine anyone older could certainly read it and some of the material was NC-17 at best.
As a new mother with a young child, it is extremely concerning that a place I would want to take my son to learn and grow I can't due to vulgar propaganda too accessible to innocent minds.
These displays are completely inappropriate for a library. Libraries are about books, history and imagination, and a place that is supposed to be family friendly, NOT a forum for pushing agendas. Very, very disappointing JMRL!
There is an old adage, "Want something done, do it yourself." Larry Brown, I hope you execute your idea yourself! Local patrons are the ones who can more effectively act. Perhaps JMRL, who has chosen to not act so far, is counting on local timidity and apathy. Show you care by your actions.
Call in Charlottesville City Council and Albemarle County Board of Supervisors; now!
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
We object to the grossly sexual and corrupting nature of the CVille NOW display in the front lobby display case in the Central Library of the Jefferson Madison Regional Library System in April of 2015. The nature of the display broke library policy of being “all age appropriate” and in no way “indicate[d] that all aspects of the issue be presented in an equal manner.” Its placement by the front doors, its proximity to the children’s section, the inability to exit the library without passing it, and the low height and glass sides of the case made it unavoidable to all patrons, most importantly children, visiting the library. The display’s presentation of women’s sexual education was in no way appropriate for the young children encountering it while visiting the library. The paraphernalia, including sexual devices, jokes, and images, were wholly disrespectful and incompatible with the library’s stated policy.
To say that children would not be able to see it and would not be interested is easily proven false by the facts that:
a) the case is known to often feature child-friendly fare (e.g., trains and, currently, stuffed sea creatures);
b) is low enough for two-year-olds to see inside;
c) was advertised in the front with a colorful rainbow cloth and a cartoon picture of animals;
d) the condoms inside were disguised as candy wrappers and soda cans;
e) several of the books used both in the case and, more prominently, on top would be interesting to children due to their bright colors and cartoons on their covers. Any child could take those books down and easily read their sexual content, including many slang words for sexual fetishes and encouragements to engage in sexual activities even if their parents disapprove.
We ask that future displays dealing with sex directly be excluded automatically as they cannot be “all age appropriate” by their nature. We are not for banning books in the library, and only ask that these books and related items with sexually explicit material not be openly displayed in the front of the library. We do expect the library to be inclusive of all patrons, including the youngest patrons and their families. We love and care about the JMRL system and want to ensure that displays with such a sexual nature do not happen again. We already live in a culture drowning with sexual images and dialogue, and we expect that a resource cherished by every community, the local library, will at least not undermine our challenging task of educating our children about deeply personal topics in the way we as parents see best. Sexual education has always been a unique topic in education, with all parents facing individual challenges related to their own families, and we would hope that the local library, of all places, will be a resource in the raising of our children, not an ideological force that any conscientious parent, of any philosophy, should have to avoid.
In response, we would like a public statement from the library director, John Halliday, addressing how this will be prevented in the future. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Updates
August 17, 2015
I am honestly overwhelmed by the response to this concern. It was never my intention to lead a cause but your collective focus has turned this into a real conversation about our library standards.
Reached 100 supporters
August 17, 2015
79 Comments
The front lobby of the public library should be an all-ages-appropriate space, and the publicly-funded library should not allow itself to be co-opted by ideological actors as a platform for political advocacy.
I hope the County sees the error of their ways and gets rid of this display. If someone were to approach a stranger's child with this information, they would be arrested and probably charged as a pedophile and forced to register ass a sex offender. Why is it okay for NOW to present it in this manner?
This is ABSOLUTELY OUTRAGEOUS. This is a topic for parents to discuss freely with their children, not for a library to put such a biased and unsanctioned by the parents who bring their children to the library display at children's level in plain view. I am extremely disappointed and disturbed by this.
I found this display to be offensive and inappropriate. I'm appalled that it was displayed where young children could see it. My four year old would be able to read it, so I imagine anyone older could certainly read it and some of the material was NC-17 at best.
As a new mother with a young child, it is extremely concerning that a place I would want to take my son to learn and grow I can't due to vulgar propaganda too accessible to innocent minds.
These displays are completely inappropriate for a library. Libraries are about books, history and imagination, and a place that is supposed to be family friendly, NOT a forum for pushing agendas. Very, very disappointing JMRL!
There is an old adage, "Want something done, do it yourself." Larry Brown, I hope you execute your idea yourself! Local patrons are the ones who can more effectively act. Perhaps JMRL, who has chosen to not act so far, is counting on local timidity and apathy. Show you care by your actions.
Call in Charlottesville City Council and Albemarle County Board of Supervisors; now!
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 250 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Make your voice count today!
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
The front lobby of the public library should be an all-ages-appropriate space, and the publicly-funded library should not allow itself to be co-opted by ideological actors as a platform for political advocacy.