To whom it may concern, we the students at UNISA, who wrote PST311L on the 29th of October 2019 at 14:30 feel that the paper was unfair and we request a 2nd paper due the following reasons.
As UNISA students, who study independently, we have learned that assignment serve as a guide to examinations, they prepare us for the exams.this paper was far off, the structure and the content in our exam questions had 0% of our assignments, which led to them being completely useless.
The module itself is called economic integration in the classroom, but the paper only had one question on learners, which made the paper more like economics then teaching economic (we are teachers), we as BED undergraduates focused on the parts of the study guide which talks about teaching ecomics and integrating it in schools.
We as students who felt that the paper was unfair request a second paper because with all the hard work we put into this paper, our sleepless nights and skipping work, as most of us are currently working and going to the exam room and finding out it was all for nothing, found this paper very discouraging.
Thank you.
Updates
November 1, 2019
Seeing so many of you echo my frustration confirms that our hard work was ignored by this exam process. This momentum proves that we refuse to let our late nights and sacrifices go to waste.
54 Comments
I'm really discourage with pst311L Nov/Oct 2019 exam paper . I did study for the module , spending a lot of time preparing but all my hard work was in vain. The truth is that if I had not studied for the exam , I will not complain .
the paper was really unfair, we even asked the lecture if it's wise to use assignments and the lecture agreed, nothing came off from the assignments, what is the purpose of the assignment? the paper was really unfair, we did not even get tutorial letter 201 while we do get from other modules.
We request to re-write the paper the paper was not fair at all we prepared for it spending sleepless nights working on the paper only to find out none of those things we studied were set on the paper.
The exam paper was not fair, looking at the previous papers some of questions were taken from the other papers thats where I got the strategy how to preapared for an exam but not even one question was there the last question was worse
Unfair examination, no scope and directive given. Poor communication. No assistance for repeating and failed students.
Unfair exams
UNFAIR PAPER!!!!!!!!!!!
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
To whom it may concern, we the students at UNISA, who wrote PST311L on the 29th of October 2019 at 14:30 feel that the paper was unfair and we request a 2nd paper due the following reasons.
As UNISA students, who study independently, we have learned that assignment serve as a guide to examinations, they prepare us for the exams.this paper was far off, the structure and the content in our exam questions had 0% of our assignments, which led to them being completely useless.
The module itself is called economic integration in the classroom, but the paper only had one question on learners, which made the paper more like economics then teaching economic (we are teachers), we as BED undergraduates focused on the parts of the study guide which talks about teaching ecomics and integrating it in schools.
We as students who felt that the paper was unfair request a second paper because with all the hard work we put into this paper, our sleepless nights and skipping work, as most of us are currently working and going to the exam room and finding out it was all for nothing, found this paper very discouraging.
Thank you.
Updates
November 1, 2019
Seeing so many of you echo my frustration confirms that our hard work was ignored by this exam process. This momentum proves that we refuse to let our late nights and sacrifices go to waste.
54 Comments
Exams was not fair at all tutors als totally mislead us with the prep and one off the tutorial letters makes it so clear at long questions only start from 2 till 5 the so why was the long questions also on 7 till 9 chapter its not right at all
I'm really discourage with pst311L Nov/Oct 2019 exam paper . I did study for the module , spending a lot of time preparing but all my hard work was in vain. The truth is that if I had not studied for the exam , I will not complain .
the paper was really unfair, we even asked the lecture if it's wise to use assignments and the lecture agreed, nothing came off from the assignments, what is the purpose of the assignment? the paper was really unfair, we did not even get tutorial letter 201 while we do get from other modules.
We request to re-write the paper the paper was not fair at all we prepared for it spending sleepless nights working on the paper only to find out none of those things we studied were set on the paper.
The exam paper was not fair, looking at the previous papers some of questions were taken from the other papers thats where I got the strategy how to preapared for an exam but not even one question was there the last question was worse
Unfair examination, no scope and directive given. Poor communication. No assistance for repeating and failed students.
Unfair exams
UNFAIR PAPER!!!!!!!!!!!
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 100 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
Exams was not fair at all tutors als totally mislead us with the prep and one off the tutorial letters makes it so clear at long questions only start from 2 till 5 the so why was the long questions also on 7 till 9 chapter its not right at all