The units will take away from the country feel of the area
S
Sean McCarthy
2 years ago
There will be tremendous demand in the future for building homes in Ontario. Please be cautious and think of the future that can be.
T
Travis Springer
2 years ago
Featured
We do not need townhouses near this beautiful, quiet spot of Ontario. There was an approval ( A GENEROUS COMPRIMISE FOR THE DEVELOPER) to build 28 homes, practically already going to be on top of each other. Why are they not selling? What's really going on behind the scenes? No one living near this area wants over 100 more apartments or units. This area will NEVER be the same. The good people of this town need to stand together and fight for what is best for this community.
E
Ed McDonald
2 years ago
If the zoning board approves the townhouses , it time to get a new zoning Board ! Reject Local Law No 5 !
T
Travis Springer
2 years ago
Never
M
Maxine McDonald
2 years ago
Featured
No Townhouses in our area! I have been here over 50 years and don't want anymore traffic than there is now. I was at the meeting 4 years ago and thought it was settled then. I guess the board thinks we have forgotten about it and are trying to sneak this in.
G
Gordon DeLorm
2 years ago
Featured
Gerber is also planning to destroy the beautiful woods within Centennial Village to build 8 buildings, 9 apartment each (total of 64 apartments) this is on wooded lands that include flood plains and Federal Wetlands home to many forms of wildlife and scenic beauty.
A
Amy Kearns
2 years ago
No to Townhouse Condos!!!
W
Wes Doyle
2 years ago
No to townhouse condos
D
Daniel Nowack
2 years ago
Featured
It was a bad idea then and it is a bad idea now. Traffic safety alone for the Furnace Rd project remains the same issue. Residents should have more say than developers.
C
Cornelia Ruedin
2 years ago
Townhouses will not benefit an already busy road. No!
J
joan stark
2 years ago
This would be a terrible burden on nearby residents. Traffic is already bad enough
M
mae church
2 years ago
I am against putting townhouses in SR areas. We don't need them or want them
S
Scott Schell
2 years ago
We don't need our town looking like any town in Rochester
M
Michael Oeschger
2 years ago
No
B
Beverly Alloco
2 years ago
We need to keep the rural areas as is, there are plenty of other places that have town homes. We live in this area because we like the rural feel, it would spoil the atmosphere and infringe on wildlife which creates even more problems.
E
Ed Indovina
2 years ago
We do not need townhouse developments in our town.
Thank you
C
Cheryl Disanto
2 years ago
Didn’t want it then don’t want it now!
J
Joanne Oagano
2 years ago
Featured
This is a significant change to the SR zoning code. Most of the houses in the SR code are on a minimum of 1/2+ acres lots. This will change the whole flavor of the town and we will lose our space to homes on tiny lots and our rutalness. Webster here we come!!!
No townhouse projects in Ontario.
The units will take away from the country feel of the area
There will be tremendous demand in the future for building homes in Ontario. Please be cautious and think of the future that can be.
We do not need townhouses near this beautiful, quiet spot of Ontario. There was an approval ( A GENEROUS COMPRIMISE FOR THE DEVELOPER) to build 28 homes, practically already going to be on top of each other. Why are they not selling? What's really going on behind the scenes? No one living near this area wants over 100 more apartments or units. This area will NEVER be the same. The good people of this town need to stand together and fight for what is best for this community.
If the zoning board approves the townhouses , it time to get a new zoning Board ! Reject Local Law No 5 !
Never
No Townhouses in our area! I have been here over 50 years and don't want anymore traffic than there is now. I was at the meeting 4 years ago and thought it was settled then. I guess the board thinks we have forgotten about it and are trying to sneak this in.
Gerber is also planning to destroy the beautiful woods within Centennial Village to build 8 buildings, 9 apartment each (total of 64 apartments) this is on wooded lands that include flood plains and Federal Wetlands home to many forms of wildlife and scenic beauty.
No to Townhouse Condos!!!
No to townhouse condos
It was a bad idea then and it is a bad idea now. Traffic safety alone for the Furnace Rd project remains the same issue. Residents should have more say than developers.
Townhouses will not benefit an already busy road. No!
This would be a terrible burden on nearby residents. Traffic is already bad enough
I am against putting townhouses in SR areas. We don't need them or want them
We don't need our town looking like any town in Rochester
No
We need to keep the rural areas as is, there are plenty of other places that have town homes. We live in this area because we like the rural feel, it would spoil the atmosphere and infringe on wildlife which creates even more problems.
We do not need townhouse developments in our town. Thank you
Didn’t want it then don’t want it now!
This is a significant change to the SR zoning code. Most of the houses in the SR code are on a minimum of 1/2+ acres lots. This will change the whole flavor of the town and we will lose our space to homes on tiny lots and our rutalness. Webster here we come!!!