A bad joke ! And ofc ...! More load of shit from them!
C
cableguy
11 years ago
I agree with this petition!
S
SophieTatts
11 years ago
I agree with this petition!
F
Fred the Dyke
11 years ago
Featured
I asked LJ before to form a userpanel, in which all parties are present. Studio's, members, performers. And take the users serious by doing that. All the demands LJ has (costing money) and all the rules they make (costing money) does not make more earnings at all. So stop being greedy.
L
Lisa
11 years ago
Back sneak peeks!
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
This is not fair!!!!!
A
Ana Stroiescu
11 years ago
It's not a fair change, models should receive their share of what Jasmin cashes in from the members, including sneak peak. But, most important, MODELS SHOULD BE ABLE TO BLOCK THEIR SNEAkPEAK FUNCTION, some members simply can't see what models do with others.
L
LLL
11 years ago
hi
F
Fred
11 years ago
Models deserve their part in this also.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Redde Caesari quae sunt Caesaris
and for me Caesar is the model I want to visit!! Fair share from peeks and tips is the least they can do.
A
Anastacia
11 years ago
We should all go together. I am a model and i have said about all this to all my friends on the site, models and members, and they all see this as an abuse from the part of the site. This is very unfair for us, the models. And this is not the only unfair thing they do to us in last month, since the management changed inside site.
N
Norad
11 years ago
You should get paid for peeks and get 100% of tips. Tip is for you not the owners of Jasmin. They did not just give a great private or dance their ass off in free.
M
maria
11 years ago
Jasmin, stop those terrible changes and let models work without any brainfucking!
E
Eyal Lev
11 years ago
Jasmin, you have been having a lot of (bad) ideas recently. But taking the sneak peek credits?
You really should talk with studio owners and affiliates about such changes, and new ideas.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Im not agree because its unfair for models to get less of earnings. Not every model win in contest and vote contest , for which site saves that money,But every model can get more earnings from sneak peaks
M
Member
11 years ago
Models go off line cause of it I'm ynsatisfying
A
anne
11 years ago
Jasmin sounds not like a Farm of Animals but like a Farm of People with a (very) brutal Master.....
M
MelisaCandy
11 years ago
Im not agree with that.Site steals our money,Support ineffective.
T
Tanya Ivanova
11 years ago
This seems very unfair. This seems simply that the new management of Jasmin are making money just by taking an income stream away from performers. To do this, in the name of promotion, is unjust. Models already promote positively, with photos & videos, with awards & competitions, with social media & countless other ways, night & day. If Jasmin continue to make decisions like this, dramatically reducing the revenue of partners, they will see many models & members leave. The site's reputation will suffer, & other sites will succeed. This is very disappointing news, & does not instill confidence in new management, or in their changes. Surely it makes more sense to engage with experience of performers, invite their responses, & involve them in decision-making process. We know what works. We know what does not. We know from experience, with many of us having worked online for years, with little or no promotion from sites. This is why the sudden substraction of performers' revenue is such a shocking audacity.
dfg
A bad joke ! And ofc ...! More load of shit from them!
I agree with this petition!
I agree with this petition!
I asked LJ before to form a userpanel, in which all parties are present. Studio's, members, performers. And take the users serious by doing that. All the demands LJ has (costing money) and all the rules they make (costing money) does not make more earnings at all. So stop being greedy.
Back sneak peeks!
This is not fair!!!!!
It's not a fair change, models should receive their share of what Jasmin cashes in from the members, including sneak peak. But, most important, MODELS SHOULD BE ABLE TO BLOCK THEIR SNEAkPEAK FUNCTION, some members simply can't see what models do with others.
hi
Models deserve their part in this also.
Redde Caesari quae sunt Caesaris and for me Caesar is the model I want to visit!! Fair share from peeks and tips is the least they can do.
We should all go together. I am a model and i have said about all this to all my friends on the site, models and members, and they all see this as an abuse from the part of the site. This is very unfair for us, the models. And this is not the only unfair thing they do to us in last month, since the management changed inside site.
You should get paid for peeks and get 100% of tips. Tip is for you not the owners of Jasmin. They did not just give a great private or dance their ass off in free.
Jasmin, stop those terrible changes and let models work without any brainfucking!
Jasmin, you have been having a lot of (bad) ideas recently. But taking the sneak peek credits? You really should talk with studio owners and affiliates about such changes, and new ideas.
Im not agree because its unfair for models to get less of earnings. Not every model win in contest and vote contest , for which site saves that money,But every model can get more earnings from sneak peaks
Models go off line cause of it I'm ynsatisfying
Jasmin sounds not like a Farm of Animals but like a Farm of People with a (very) brutal Master.....
Im not agree with that.Site steals our money,Support ineffective.
This seems very unfair. This seems simply that the new management of Jasmin are making money just by taking an income stream away from performers. To do this, in the name of promotion, is unjust. Models already promote positively, with photos & videos, with awards & competitions, with social media & countless other ways, night & day. If Jasmin continue to make decisions like this, dramatically reducing the revenue of partners, they will see many models & members leave. The site's reputation will suffer, & other sites will succeed. This is very disappointing news, & does not instill confidence in new management, or in their changes. Surely it makes more sense to engage with experience of performers, invite their responses, & involve them in decision-making process. We know what works. We know what does not. We know from experience, with many of us having worked online for years, with little or no promotion from sites. This is why the sudden substraction of performers' revenue is such a shocking audacity.