Skip to main content

The Intersections of Brookside/Glenville/Valley/ Construction

58 Comments

J
Jonathan Sherwyn
5 years ago

I oppose this needless expensive project.

S
Suzanne Sherwyn
5 years ago

I strongly oppose this costly and unnecessary project. The neighborhood is doing just fine without this transformation of our landscape.

K
Karen Shaffer
5 years ago

This traffic circle seems to be a waste of the city’s resources when it’s not needed at that intersection.

M
Mason Sleeper
5 years ago

I object to this project.

K
Karen Drakos
5 years ago

I object to this project

J
James Drakos
5 years ago

I believe the sum of $1,750,000 can be directed to more deserving projects and object to the proposed traffic circles.

A
Ann Firestone
5 years ago

As I understand it, accident data does not support the DPW proposal. Therefore, the justification for this project seems very weak.

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

The sporadic congestion does not justify the scope of this project or the cost.

J
James R Matthews
5 years ago

This project is unnecessary for traffic and safety, and it would be waste of money to even investigate any further.

S
Sally L Mohr
5 years ago

live at 44 Glenville road opposed to the construction project at Glenville/Valley and Brookside/Glenville

S
Scott Mohr
5 years ago

We live at 44 Glenville Road We are opposed to the traffic circles at Glenville/Valley and Brookside/Valley

V
Valerie Stauffer
6 years ago

I do not believe that the traffic justifies this construction or expense.

B
Beth and John MacGillivray
6 years ago

No to changes at Glenville St widening too. Save the money

W
Wynn McDaniel
6 years ago

I support this petition

M
Mary Nanette Burrows
6 years ago

Given the current environment it is important to allocate our limited tiwn resources wisely. This is not the moment for this project.

H
Henry Orphys
6 years ago

I have noticed traffic congestion at this intersection only for short periods of time during evening rush hour, and even that congestion does not appear sufficient to justify undertaking this project.

B
Bill Galvin
6 years ago

If accident data do not support the DPW proposal, then we do not NEED this project to improve public safety.

D
Doreen Pearson
6 years ago

We walked the area today and appreciated the “scenic road” impression of this lovely neighborhood. Yes the traffic needs calming and speed limit enforcement but designation for M.I will only invite more traffic backups and increase in speeding. Preserve our neighborhoods and save our tax dollars.