Support Sustainable Development at Stanford

Peter Drekmeier
Anonymous 160 Comments
505 Signatures Goal: 500

Petition to the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors Regarding the 2018 Stanford GUP.

Stanford University has requested the right to add 3.5 million square feet of new development on campus over the course of its 2018 General Use Permit (GUP), which will guide development through 2035. This amount of development is the equivalent of two-and-a-half Stanford Shopping Centers. We are concerned about the potential impacts of such a large amount of growth over a relatively short period of time. We encourage the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors to impose the following requirements as conditions of approval of Stanford’s 2018 GUP.

  • Stanford cannot continue to grow indefinitely without seriously compromising our quality of life on the Peninsula. The County should establish a maximum build-out for the University. Under the 2000 GUP, Stanford was required to study the maximum build-out potential for its campus in its Sustainable Development Study, but failed to do so.
  • In exchange for the higher density of development on campus, the Stanford foothills outside of the Academic Growth Boundary should be preserved as permanent open space.
  • The proposed academic development under the GUP should not make the regional housing shortage worse. Stanford should be required to provide housing on campus or close by for the influx of new students, faculty, staff and contract workers.
  • Stanford’s development should not make the regional traffic crisis worse. Every new automobile trip generated by the GUP should be offset by the removal of a trip, both during peak and non-peak hours. Furthermore, the 2018 GUP should require no net new parking spaces on campus.
  • Stanford should be required to adopt a policy of carbon neutrality for all new construction.

  • farook afsari
    farook afsari United States, San Mateo
    Feb 04, 2018
    Feb 04, 2018
    Impact to current residents is huge; this is not an area of commercial business, it is residential and it should be kept that way. Please deny Stanford's application.
  • Margaret Williams
    Margaret Williams United States, San Francisco
    Feb 03, 2018
    Feb 03, 2018
    My neighborhood, Stanford Weekend Acres, serves as a mini-freeway to access the 280 freeway to to access Stanford. With only two lanes, we have double the number of cars and trucks on our little Alpine Road segment than the four-lane Sand Hill Road. Stanfords and Santa Clara County's tremendous expansion plans can kill our small community. Please use your common sense and kidness when you consider Stanfords expansionist proposals.
  • Charles Martin
    Charles Martin United States, Belmont
    Feb 03, 2018
    Feb 03, 2018
    Preserve the open space permanently.
  • Marianne Ault-Riche
    Marianne Ault-Riche United States, San Mateo
    Feb 03, 2018
    Feb 03, 2018
    marianne.aultriche@gmail.com
See More
505

Signatures

  • 2 weeks ago
    Tara United States
    2 weeks ago
  • 2 weeks ago
    Paul Gillis United States
    2 weeks ago
  • 2 weeks ago
    farook afsari United States
    2 weeks ago
  • 2 weeks ago
    Margaret Williams United States
    2 weeks ago
  • 2 weeks ago
    Charles Martin United States
    2 weeks ago
  • 2 weeks ago
    John Peterson United States
    2 weeks ago
  • 2 weeks ago
    Marianne Ault-Riche United States
    2 weeks ago
  • 2 weeks ago
    Clark Wilcox United States
    2 weeks ago
  • 2 weeks ago
    Monica Wilcox United States
    2 weeks ago
  • 2 weeks ago
    Robert Dicks United States
    2 weeks ago
  • 2 weeks ago
    Joseph Brown United States
    2 weeks ago
  • 2 weeks ago
    Elizabeth Brown United States
    2 weeks ago
  • 2 weeks ago
    Lynn Thompson Mexico
    2 weeks ago
  • 2 weeks ago
    Derafael United States
    2 weeks ago
  • 2 weeks ago
    Rebecca Frid-Nielsen United States
    2 weeks ago
See More