Skip to main content

The rezoning application has been officially withdrawn. We won. Stay alert to ensure the neighborhood character remains protected.

September 15, 2020

Sunnywood Lane Rezoning Opposition

Sunnywood Lane Rezoning Opposition

🏆 Won — 485 supporters Verified

Final supporters

M
Maureen H.
U
Ursula H.
B
Bruce H.
W
West C.
B
Bryan M.
G
Garilyn C.
D
David C.
S
Someone
G
Gwendolyn M.
S
Someone
+475 more
AF
Started by ALEXIS FRISINGER 5 years, 11 months ago

We, the undersigned surrounding neighbors, are in OPPOSITION to Rezoning Petition 2020-066 for the 3.62 acres located along the north side of Sardis Road North, east of Sunnywood Lane, and south of Watergate Road. This rezoning application requests changing current R-3 (R-3 = Single family—3.0 units per acre) to to UR-1 (CD) (UR-1(CD) = Urban residential—max. floor area ratio 0.25 (conditional zoning).

The plan is inconsistent with South District Plan for long-range planning, which recommends single family residential land use, at a density of three units per acre. The plan is also inconsistent with surrounding neighborhoods.

Updates

Reached 250 supporters

August 12, 2020

August 11, 2020

We are approaching 250 signatures. Get this in front of your neighbors so we can hit that mark today.

Reached 100 supporters

August 4, 2020

183 Comments

A
Anonymous
5 years ago Featured

This lot is not big enough to accommodate 18 homes and, because they’re cramming them on such a small lot, there is not enough parking and road access for the development which will have a significantly negative effect on the traffic and access for the existing neighborhood.

K
Kristof Leopold
5 years ago Featured

Not only is the design inconsistent with the surrounding neighborhoods, there is no accounting for enough off street parking for visitors. Also, what is the plan to treat runoff water before it is returned to the McAlpine Creek water system?

S
Shanyn Leake
5 years ago Featured

Building here will cut off driver sight lines. I believe it is dangerous and irresponsible. Inconsistent to surrounding neighborhood. Doesn’t meet requirements for Charlotte’s Southern District Plan for residential development. Not accessible to emergency vehicles.

M
Mitch Dills
5 years ago Featured

We need less units to ensure it maintains the look of it’s surrounding homes. Units should be all brick, include sound / privacy barriers, and maintaining our large spaces. Halks and large owls live in this space.

J
Jon Burkindine
5 years ago Featured

That is not the right area or neighborhood for high density housing. The zoning should be changed to R-4 at the highest. Look at the house across Sunnywood and the houses across the Sardis Rd. N. and you'll find larger lots and individual homes.

L
Linda and Joseph Quinn
5 years ago Featured

We do not oppose development and building of new housing units but the density of this proposal does not fit with this property. Also, because of the density there is not adequate parking or roads/driveways.

G
Garilyn Callicott
5 years ago

This is a Suburb (neighborhood), NOT suitable for Urban Residential...

D
David Callicott
5 years ago

This property is too small to accommodate this many units.

Share Petition

Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact

Copy link or share directly

Instagram
QR Code