Stop The Village Assessments Vote

There are no current legal Board of Directors so why are we not voting now for the new Board?

I’m disgusted with all these legal fees, starting with the washer/dryer fiasco resulting in suing a townhouse owner, and ending with these HOA changes without unilateral support.

All HOA members share equally in common areas!

I concur with Greg Rosicky. It is an unfair assessment because the association expenses are primarily common area maintenance, staffing, insurance, legal fees and contracts.

Can't believe that 3 board members in the smallest units can do this to us.

The amendment is patently unfair. Some units would pay almost 3 times as much as others for the same or in some cases fewer amenities and services from the HOA. Also goes against the State recommendation, common practice in California, and 2 legal opinions the Board paid for regarding this.

Please find a way to Stop this nonsense and start putting our moneys back into improving our property!!!

I am against the Board going against legal recommendations of their attornies and the apparent lack of fiduciary duty they've displayed.

I believe the Board is not right the way they want to divide the expenses, even that some Units are smaller, we all enjoy the same benefices in the common areas.

Completely unfair assessment! Recent irregular decision making and actions by the current board sends all the wrong messages, very concerning. Many homeowners noticing. The right thing to do would be to stop wasting homeowner resources in so many legal fees and allow the new board to take over any remaining sensitive matters.

It is an unfair assessment based on the expenses incurred by the association which are primarily common space maintenance, staffing, insurance, legal fees and contracts. The size of unit has nothing to do with the monthly and annual expenses. Moreover, each unit has a 1/323 interest in the common area, no more, no less.

As a relatively new (almost 1 year) owner, it seems a NO vote or discarding the vote keeps status quo which seems like a very reasonable and fair situation and what makes our units highly desirable, regardless of size.

This Board is invalid. Its authority to put forward any amendment is highly questionable, and its actions might breach the fiduciary responsibility required of the Directors. In short, this is a mess and messes like this will cost the members unnecessary legal expenses.

Village board terms have expired and they have no legitimate authority.

No on the amendment

Let's not lump ALL of the current Board in with the three that absolutely voted their pecuniary interest over the interest of the community at large. Let's wait to see if a Board vote is had to postpone the amendment vote. Since mediation is pending, it would seem bad faith to continue with this rushed initiative. Otherwise, what is the point of mediation? More attorney fees? We are already WAY over budget and well beyond what other recent Boards have spent!

the current board is biased and seems like in collusion with Horizon..board members need to remember they are our neighbors, not condo nazis who think the village is their own little kingdom..also, we must stop any board member who has overstayed their board representation.

Exactly. Why the "Urgent" rush? Why cram it thru days before the election of new board members? These current board members, with the exception of Mr. Erickson, are not acting in good faith and ignoring legal advice re the subject, which is a breach of their fiduciary duties. What I've witnessed during the past 19 months is a disgrace.

Agree. Why the rush? If the board election ballet can be postponed, why can't the assessment ballet? The fact that the current board push so hard to get the assessment ballet passed before the board election make the whole assessment amendment fishy!

What's the rush? There are too many irregularities associated with this ballot issue. Let the incoming board -- along with the association's membership -- take a transparent look at it next year.