this is a waste. Check your budget, well, when we have one, we can't afford, it will not help, there are a whole lot of givaways to contractors in this state, we can't affor that either. Screwing up more good land for more piss-poor roads that we don't maintain is ridiculous.
E
Elisabeth Noty
10 years ago
This is a true waste of taxpayer dollars. If any of this development ever comes to pass, there will be damage and expenses that can never be reversed.
J
Jerry Hicks
10 years ago
Please think of our environment, before you waste these resources and damage our ecology.
R
Ralph Vidmar
10 years ago
From what I have read, extending Rt. 53 under the current plan is neither economically nor environmentally sound.
M
Marilyn Davis
10 years ago
Why????
R
Richard E. Lee
10 years ago
Please leave OUR Wetlands and Other Areas ALONE!!!
G
greg debros
10 years ago
oppose
L
Laura Long
10 years ago
Please do not endanger our wildlife and wetlands with this wasteful project. I do not want to see more concrete destroying our landscape.
M
Moira Ford
10 years ago
The EOH project was unnecessary and expensive, and now there's another proposal to extend Rt.53? STOP IT!
P
perry bonnevier
10 years ago
have'nt you paved enough paridise
K
Kathy Zang
10 years ago
Featured
The money that is already coming in needs to be handled with more fiscal responsibility. I've been around since 1950. I remember that tolls would only be around until the road was finished. There is no magic pay raise for all of the citizens you want to tax for this nonsense. Don't need it, and can't afford it.
M
Mildred O'Brien
10 years ago
Why burden taxpayers with a road they don't need and don't want and can't afford?
D
David Schaefer
10 years ago
We do not need this expensive tollway parallel to an existing freeway that has additional capacity, although rush hours can be intense and slow. The cost is not worth the benefit, in my opinion.
Z
Zoe Willet
10 years ago
Invest in rail service , not highways !
A
AURORA INSURRIAGA
10 years ago
Plant trees not roads.
E
edward max
10 years ago
The ultimate costs to build this thing will surely,go way over cost....they always do!
Who's getting paid off to pave over Lake County?
NO to route 53 expansion
this is a waste. Check your budget, well, when we have one, we can't afford, it will not help, there are a whole lot of givaways to contractors in this state, we can't affor that either. Screwing up more good land for more piss-poor roads that we don't maintain is ridiculous.
This is a true waste of taxpayer dollars. If any of this development ever comes to pass, there will be damage and expenses that can never be reversed.
Please think of our environment, before you waste these resources and damage our ecology.
From what I have read, extending Rt. 53 under the current plan is neither economically nor environmentally sound.
Why????
Please leave OUR Wetlands and Other Areas ALONE!!!
oppose
Please do not endanger our wildlife and wetlands with this wasteful project. I do not want to see more concrete destroying our landscape.
The EOH project was unnecessary and expensive, and now there's another proposal to extend Rt.53? STOP IT!
have'nt you paved enough paridise
The money that is already coming in needs to be handled with more fiscal responsibility. I've been around since 1950. I remember that tolls would only be around until the road was finished. There is no magic pay raise for all of the citizens you want to tax for this nonsense. Don't need it, and can't afford it.
Why burden taxpayers with a road they don't need and don't want and can't afford?
We do not need this expensive tollway parallel to an existing freeway that has additional capacity, although rush hours can be intense and slow. The cost is not worth the benefit, in my opinion.
Invest in rail service , not highways !
Plant trees not roads.
The ultimate costs to build this thing will surely,go way over cost....they always do!
Save Mother Earth
Stop the road-building addiction