Stop the Swap! I agree with Julia Parker's comment
N
Natalie Rooney
5 years ago
We need to stop pandering to developers and hold them accountable.
L
Lauren Bumgarner
5 years ago
Featured
The proposed swap does not serve those already living in the community and would also cause significant traffic congestion along Ouzel and Eagle Ranch.
B
Bethanie Lindal
5 years ago
Completely against this development
K
Kelly Karli
5 years ago
The change only benefits the developer not the locals that live in the community. DO NOT SWAP!
R
Robert Clasen
5 years ago
Original plan is sensible and more beneficial to the community
J
Jon Walters
5 years ago
I strongly disagree with the proposed changes the developer is requesting. The new plan is a huge deviation from the proposed plan and will negatively effect the community in a number of ways. They should be forced to stay with their current plan.
K
Kim Bradley
5 years ago
Featured
I oppose due to the time and planning involved with the original approval of the school site and the vision to share amenities between the recreation and school districts. Shared amenities is the best use of our tax dollars!
G
Gregory Meister
5 years ago
The developer needs to stick to the original plan, that was agreed to.
J
Julia Parker
5 years ago
No swap. The project as a whole does not seem very well planned to meld with our Eagle Community. Changing what was already controversial approval of development does not make sense. Any way to re-write the whole script out there and use the Colby place as an example and create ranchettes. Just thinking out loud.
J
John and Karen Field
5 years ago
Block views, Properties Value, congestion
D
Dave Gerdes
5 years ago
The developer has failed to plan and communicate. There does not appear to be a good reason for this change that benefits anyone but the developer. Take a look at the status updates on Haymeadow.com to see the developers total lack of communication to the community.
L
Linda McLaughlin
5 years ago
Please don’t allow the swap to take place. The best plan is already in place.
J
Janice Tonz
5 years ago
Featured
I live in Brush Creek Village and oppose this swap for multiple reasons, including the following: negatively effect on property values; traffic congestion on Brush Creek; benefits only the developer, who should follow the original PUD; sets a precedent for future developers to try to bypass the original PUD.
L
Laura Howe
5 years ago
I vehemently oppose the Haymeadow Swap.
P
Peter Leibig
5 years ago
Stop the Swap!
R
RIC TURMEL
5 years ago
The developer's error/lack or resources should not be assisted by the government.
B
Brian Bishop
5 years ago
Absolutely not... this will impact our home value as soon as it's put in place.
Stop the Swap! I agree with Julia Parker's comment
We need to stop pandering to developers and hold them accountable.
The proposed swap does not serve those already living in the community and would also cause significant traffic congestion along Ouzel and Eagle Ranch.
Completely against this development
The change only benefits the developer not the locals that live in the community. DO NOT SWAP!
Original plan is sensible and more beneficial to the community
I strongly disagree with the proposed changes the developer is requesting. The new plan is a huge deviation from the proposed plan and will negatively effect the community in a number of ways. They should be forced to stay with their current plan.
I oppose due to the time and planning involved with the original approval of the school site and the vision to share amenities between the recreation and school districts. Shared amenities is the best use of our tax dollars!
The developer needs to stick to the original plan, that was agreed to.
No swap. The project as a whole does not seem very well planned to meld with our Eagle Community. Changing what was already controversial approval of development does not make sense. Any way to re-write the whole script out there and use the Colby place as an example and create ranchettes. Just thinking out loud.
Block views, Properties Value, congestion
The developer has failed to plan and communicate. There does not appear to be a good reason for this change that benefits anyone but the developer. Take a look at the status updates on Haymeadow.com to see the developers total lack of communication to the community.
Please don’t allow the swap to take place. The best plan is already in place.
I live in Brush Creek Village and oppose this swap for multiple reasons, including the following: negatively effect on property values; traffic congestion on Brush Creek; benefits only the developer, who should follow the original PUD; sets a precedent for future developers to try to bypass the original PUD.
I vehemently oppose the Haymeadow Swap.
Stop the Swap!
The developer's error/lack or resources should not be assisted by the government.
Absolutely not... this will impact our home value as soon as it's put in place.