Stop the development of land to the North of Chestnut Drive, Claverham.
67 Comments
C
carolyn baker
11 years ago
no houses we haven't got the facilities to cope
D
david mills(babber)
11 years ago
this piece of land has been used recreationaly for all the years i have lived here,although privately owned.people have bought houses, purposely to overlook this little bit of heaven.children play here alongside the grasing cows.its unique.the village cannot support a new housing estate.there is little or no bus service.no permanent po,super marlket etc.the council cannot maintain the roads and keep the drains flowing freely as it is.the school is full up.there is no local employment.this village was created by quakers and methodists,purposely to bedifferent fom the others.hence,no pubs etc.
D
david mills(babber)
11 years ago
this piece of land has been used recreationaly for all the years i have lived here,although privately owned.people have bought houses, purposely to overlook this little bit of heaven.children play here alongside the grasing cows.its unique.the village cannot support a new housing estate.there is little or no bus service.no permanent po,super marlket etc.the council cannot maintain the roads and keep the drains flowing freely as it is.the school is full up.there is no local employment.this village was created by quakers and methodists,purposely to bedifferent fom the others.hence,no pubs etc.
S
Sal Pearson
11 years ago
Featured
Such an impact on the village can't be good particularly if the infrastructure isn't there to support the added numbers of people, cars services and so on. Also, as a conservationist beekeeper I find the destruction of hedgerows, trees & wild flowers in the field some thing of a blow for insects.
M
Madeleine Ogden
11 years ago
Development of 100 houses will lead to an influx of cars and people that our small village would not be able to handle. This development cannot go ahead.
M
Madeleine Ogden
11 years ago
Development of 100 houses will lead to an influx of cars and people that our small village would not be able to handle. This development cannot go ahead.
S
SANDRA OGDEN
11 years ago
Too many houses in an area which floods, lack of amenites (school places etc) narrow roads, access via narrow country lane.
D
Dave Jackson
11 years ago
far many houses for the area allotted, but it will make someone rich
R
Ralph James
11 years ago
Featured
The only acces to this field is by very narrow lanes with dangerous bends and no pavements but lined with houses. The previous owners tried for years to have this field re-designated but were always turned down by NSC. The situation has not improved. Rather, traffic is now worse.
B
Brian smith
11 years ago
Very limited access no school place no shops
M
martin preston
11 years ago
this can't be allowed to happen
A
Alan Christie
11 years ago
should not be allowed
B
Bruce Bembridge
11 years ago
Strength to our arms!
L
Laura Parsons
11 years ago
to put the proposed number of houses here is an outrage. This is a village not a town, we don't have the infrastructure to deal with this many houses here.
A
Andrew Perrott
11 years ago
Unless they want to buy everyone gondolas, this is not a good idea.
L
Liam Bishop
11 years ago
This is an outrage
L
Luke Christie
11 years ago
Claverham would never cope with the additional houses, the field is already a floodplain, i remember a few years back it flooded so bad then froze, we were using it as an iceskating rink! Let alone the roads need a lot of attention, the road surfice is poor and will only get worse, congestion is bad enough in the morning so adding so many more cars to the equation will make it ridiculous! We have no infrastructure in any area's to accommodate such an increase of people to the area.
H
Howard Davies
11 years ago
The proposed site is subject to flooding and there is not the infrastructure in Claerham to support such a development
N
Neil Tanner
11 years ago
This excessive level of development will most certainly have a damaging impact on an environment already under pressure from frequent episodes of flooding, and an infrastructure already at capacity.
D
David Guest
11 years ago
A development of this nature and scale is not suitable in this location.
no houses we haven't got the facilities to cope
this piece of land has been used recreationaly for all the years i have lived here,although privately owned.people have bought houses, purposely to overlook this little bit of heaven.children play here alongside the grasing cows.its unique.the village cannot support a new housing estate.there is little or no bus service.no permanent po,super marlket etc.the council cannot maintain the roads and keep the drains flowing freely as it is.the school is full up.there is no local employment.this village was created by quakers and methodists,purposely to bedifferent fom the others.hence,no pubs etc.
this piece of land has been used recreationaly for all the years i have lived here,although privately owned.people have bought houses, purposely to overlook this little bit of heaven.children play here alongside the grasing cows.its unique.the village cannot support a new housing estate.there is little or no bus service.no permanent po,super marlket etc.the council cannot maintain the roads and keep the drains flowing freely as it is.the school is full up.there is no local employment.this village was created by quakers and methodists,purposely to bedifferent fom the others.hence,no pubs etc.
Such an impact on the village can't be good particularly if the infrastructure isn't there to support the added numbers of people, cars services and so on. Also, as a conservationist beekeeper I find the destruction of hedgerows, trees & wild flowers in the field some thing of a blow for insects.
Development of 100 houses will lead to an influx of cars and people that our small village would not be able to handle. This development cannot go ahead.
Development of 100 houses will lead to an influx of cars and people that our small village would not be able to handle. This development cannot go ahead.
Too many houses in an area which floods, lack of amenites (school places etc) narrow roads, access via narrow country lane.
far many houses for the area allotted, but it will make someone rich
The only acces to this field is by very narrow lanes with dangerous bends and no pavements but lined with houses. The previous owners tried for years to have this field re-designated but were always turned down by NSC. The situation has not improved. Rather, traffic is now worse.
Very limited access no school place no shops
this can't be allowed to happen
should not be allowed
Strength to our arms!
to put the proposed number of houses here is an outrage. This is a village not a town, we don't have the infrastructure to deal with this many houses here.
Unless they want to buy everyone gondolas, this is not a good idea.
This is an outrage
Claverham would never cope with the additional houses, the field is already a floodplain, i remember a few years back it flooded so bad then froze, we were using it as an iceskating rink! Let alone the roads need a lot of attention, the road surfice is poor and will only get worse, congestion is bad enough in the morning so adding so many more cars to the equation will make it ridiculous! We have no infrastructure in any area's to accommodate such an increase of people to the area.
The proposed site is subject to flooding and there is not the infrastructure in Claerham to support such a development
This excessive level of development will most certainly have a damaging impact on an environment already under pressure from frequent episodes of flooding, and an infrastructure already at capacity.
A development of this nature and scale is not suitable in this location.