Since
the addition of a large screen in the children's section of St. Thomas' public
library, a scene that used to feature families sprawling on the mats, reading
together, has been replaced by a scene of a few kids hanging out, usually
alone, staring at a screen, unaware that they are in a room filled with
wonderful books. Last week, I was informed that the new rule is that children
may no longer READ on those lovely mats, because they are reserved for playing
and watching videos, instead. Children wishing to read will have to go to
another space, away from the children’s books and comfortable seating. My kids
broke the rule by attempting to read on the mats, but were eventually curious
to see what the music video with sexy dancing was all about (Bollywood?). It's
time to do something about this.
I
have asked for a schedule of when videos will be aired or not aired so that I
can plan my trips that will include reading or selecting books around that
schedule. No schedule exists, no educational programming relating to the videos
exists, and I was informed that I am "the only one who doesn't like the
videos." Conscientious parents (especially those of young children)
usually choose when their kids watch something, how long they watch something,
and what the content is. The last place I expect to have to compete with
sub-par video entertainment is at a library. I thought a public library was an
educationally focused, family friendly public resource that encourages the
reading and borrowing of books. I know that I am not alone, so please make your
voice heard, too!
This
is a beautiful library, and someone clearly put some thought into choosing good
children's books and ordering nice furnishings. Libraries can be a lifeline for
families who lack the funds and space for a large private collection or access
to a well-endowed private school's library. By constantly airing videos, it
undermines the efforts of parents and care providers who understand the
benefits of reading to and with children. It says that video entertainment
(Disney films, music videos, soccer matches, and so on) is more important than
reading and trying to better one's self.
If
you believe that our island's children would benefit from watching fewer videos
and reading more, please sign the petition. If you believe in having a say in
what.where/when your kids watch, please sign the petition. If you believe that
libraries can still be places where children get excited about books and have
the freedom to focus on the selection and reading of books without being
barraged/lured by distracting videos, please sign the petition. Developing
enthusiastic readers and using our precious public resources in the way they
were intended improves our whole island's quality of life.
For
those who feel strongly, please voice your opinion when you visit the library,
and send a letter to the Territorial Director of Libraries, Archives &
Museums, Ms. Ingrid A. Bough at [email protected]
http://webshare.northseattle.edu/fam180/topics/tv/tvvsread.htm
http://winginstitute.org/Graphs/Home/TV-watching-vs--Reading-Scores-17-yr-olds/
http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-living/childrens-health/in-depth/children-and-tv/art-20047952?pg=2
http://www.winmentalhealth.com/images/teaching_children_reading.jpg
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201404/does-too-much-screen-time-make-kids-sick
I disagree with both of these comments. I have been to the library about 5 times since the addition of the screen. Only once was it actually off. Most days, movies for older children were being played and one day there was gun violence on the screen. My kids are 2 and 5. This is not something I want them viewing. Libraries should be screen-free places and the addition of TV and movies should be in a separate space. I agree that the staff is fantastic. I don't think anyone is complaining about them, the room or the wonderful selection of books. But the library is for books, not TV.