The roads are much too narrow, hilly and curvy for too much more traffic than we already have. Seminary and E. Strawberry are major bike routes for tourists from SF to Tiburon Ferry. And my little grandchildren live on Reed halfway down the hill that cars already speed down. One of these 3 roads would need to be made into a highway to get all the people in and out in a timely fashion daily since there is no alternative route at the other end except by boat! Maybe the developer has considered building an overhead as part of their as yet undivulged traffic plan.
S
Sandra Lelich
8 years ago
Listen to the residents of Strawberry. We already have a plan!
P
Paul Cohen
8 years ago
Our Superviser and her developer pals continue to try to submit the same bad projects despite community objections.
S
Susan Carter Orb
8 years ago
Against overdevelopment in Strawberry.
J
Joan Ravetto
8 years ago
The new proposal is worse than the old one. The Strawberry Community must be involved. The plan as it now stands will ruin life for Strawberry's current residents and will be awful for people who will be moving into the Seminary development as well.
P
Patricia Collins
8 years ago
as referenced: Advanced contention
is costly.
K
KAREN
8 years ago
Please for a moment, think about nature and our natural resources. Not enough water. Not enough space for wildlife. Simply refurbish the existing housing and rent it to lower income families, teachers, students, and all the service providers that need to comute to serve this entitled community.
Heres's a better idea, let the company file chapter 11 on this on or donate it to the state/county. Governor Brown, if your listening....please buy this back from the greedy developers and declare it sacred park land.
S
Sharon Guy
8 years ago
I oppose a plan that adds undue congestion to the Strawberry area. There is limited access and vulnerable habitat to consider. The plans I have seen so far would bring hundreds in and out daily with special event crowds in addition. This is not the right location for a city on the hill.
S
Strawberry Community Association and Seminary Neighborhood Asssociation
· petition starter
8 years ago
This is the biggest project in Marin. It is appalling how open ended the application and project description are. The project is an extreme deviation from the community plan. It is not suitable for environmental review. The Board of Supervisors needs to fund a community plan amendment process that involves the community to determine the appropriate project for environmental review. We want a project that makes good use of this beautiful property while being sustainable for future generations.
P
Philip Gardner
8 years ago
Stop overdevelopment !
P
Philip Gardner
8 years ago
Stop overdevelopment !
J
Jo Haraf
8 years ago
Change will come but the community must be involved in the final plan.
W
Willard Tunney
8 years ago
This proposal is way over the top...lt’s like Marincello...
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Not opposed to development. However the size, scale and traffic impact needs to make sense to the entire community. Let's have a sensible conversation about how to achieve this.
R
Robert Martyn
8 years ago
Supervisors and Planning Commission need to do their job and represent the electorate and approved existing plans, not special interests.
D
David Leimsieder
8 years ago
The community stands together in opposition of this development plan.
D
David Moll
8 years ago
NCLH has demonstrated -- time and time again -- their complete and utter contempt for the community's input on this project.
The farcical suggestion by NCLH that a commuter school is an appropriate replacement for the current residential campus is indicative of their tone-deafness.
This proposal is un-approvable in its current form, and must be denied.
A
Alexandria Hilton
8 years ago
Please preserve our neighborhood and community peace!
Please listen to the community.
traffic already is a nightmare !!!!
The roads are much too narrow, hilly and curvy for too much more traffic than we already have. Seminary and E. Strawberry are major bike routes for tourists from SF to Tiburon Ferry. And my little grandchildren live on Reed halfway down the hill that cars already speed down. One of these 3 roads would need to be made into a highway to get all the people in and out in a timely fashion daily since there is no alternative route at the other end except by boat! Maybe the developer has considered building an overhead as part of their as yet undivulged traffic plan.
Listen to the residents of Strawberry. We already have a plan!
Our Superviser and her developer pals continue to try to submit the same bad projects despite community objections.
Against overdevelopment in Strawberry.
The new proposal is worse than the old one. The Strawberry Community must be involved. The plan as it now stands will ruin life for Strawberry's current residents and will be awful for people who will be moving into the Seminary development as well.
as referenced: Advanced contention is costly.
Please for a moment, think about nature and our natural resources. Not enough water. Not enough space for wildlife. Simply refurbish the existing housing and rent it to lower income families, teachers, students, and all the service providers that need to comute to serve this entitled community. Heres's a better idea, let the company file chapter 11 on this on or donate it to the state/county. Governor Brown, if your listening....please buy this back from the greedy developers and declare it sacred park land.
I oppose a plan that adds undue congestion to the Strawberry area. There is limited access and vulnerable habitat to consider. The plans I have seen so far would bring hundreds in and out daily with special event crowds in addition. This is not the right location for a city on the hill.
This is the biggest project in Marin. It is appalling how open ended the application and project description are. The project is an extreme deviation from the community plan. It is not suitable for environmental review. The Board of Supervisors needs to fund a community plan amendment process that involves the community to determine the appropriate project for environmental review. We want a project that makes good use of this beautiful property while being sustainable for future generations.
Stop overdevelopment !
Stop overdevelopment !
Change will come but the community must be involved in the final plan.
This proposal is way over the top...lt’s like Marincello...
Not opposed to development. However the size, scale and traffic impact needs to make sense to the entire community. Let's have a sensible conversation about how to achieve this.
Supervisors and Planning Commission need to do their job and represent the electorate and approved existing plans, not special interests.
The community stands together in opposition of this development plan.
NCLH has demonstrated -- time and time again -- their complete and utter contempt for the community's input on this project. The farcical suggestion by NCLH that a commuter school is an appropriate replacement for the current residential campus is indicative of their tone-deafness. This proposal is un-approvable in its current form, and must be denied.
Please preserve our neighborhood and community peace!