Stop Generative AI in Creative Arts

Henry

I have been against AI since it was globally introduced. Humans have so much to offer that AI wants to destroy and deprive straight from our fingertips and we’re willingly letting them. I cannot stand for that, I must find a way for it be gone. Thank you for this opportunity.

Bella Fischer

AI does NOT belong in our art.

machines cant feel anything so how can they make art. its just stealing patterns from real people who actually worked for years to get good. garbage tech.

STOP THE THEFT. keep art human.

it’s just soulless trash. watching actual talented people get pushed out by a robot algorithm makes me so mad.

AI art is theft and damages artists

People who use AI have no taste and are proudly impotent

There is no art if it is made without a heart. No environment destroying, art stealing, generative AI could possibly do what a human artist can and should never be utilized in their place. Full stop, ever.

Spectacular

Yes! No more a.i slop

Parem de usar inteligência artificial

True artists are the true fans and put their heart and soul into what they do.

We, creative people are irreplaceable!

Daysi Parada

i support this petition because Ai is going too far. Real people put their hearts into art. ai is the enemy of organic creative expression.

Real art is better

Yes please stop A.I. from stealing real human artist art.

I am definitely against using AI in creative arts!!

Keep creativity first before AI !!

Even when you take away the environmental concerns, the art theft required to train AI models, and the dangers to your brain health, AI still has no place in creative spaces. Creating art has always been a way to communicate from one person (or group of people) to an audience. The implication is that there is something that needs to be expressed through specific artistic mediums to create a feeling of connection between the artist and the audience. Using AI, which currently can’t be used ethically and is facing several lawsuits regarding the artistic theft it requires to be functional, feels almost insulting to both the artist and the audience. If someone can’t be bothered to write/paint/act/sing something from themselves, why would I bother to engage with it? It’s in the struggle to express a theme or message that makes the art worth not just creating but viewing. I actively will stop engaging with art when I find out it’s even AI-modified (beyond the basics that we’ve had for decades that include things like spell check and clippy) because the lack of transparency in how the companies train their AI programs means you’re always taking a chance that they’ve built a tool on stolen art. Allowing artists of all mediums to be usurped by creators who can’t be bothered to take the time to craft/revise/integrate new ideas to create a work they can show off is worth less than the materials it cost to create it. It’s in the challenge of struggling to create art that often makes the most impactful pieces. If an artist so desperately wants a computer to do the heavy lifting of creating art that they can show off, I’d suggest hosting a movie night where they can take artistic credit for being able to operate the Blu Ray player.