AN UPDATE, 9 FEBRUARY 2023
Tate are going ahead with a half-term event for young kids fronted by a drag queen who breaches their own safe-guarding rules. We raised these red flags and Tate ignored us. Thousands of you signed our petition. They ignored you too. And now the row has been co-opted by trans rights and far-right extremist groups who are planning on turning up at Tate Britain on Saturday in masks to scream abuse at each other and terrify small kids. Tate think what they’re doing counts as diversity; look how what they are actually creating is division. This isn’t about art; it’s about gender political carnage and Tate have put themselves in the middle of it all without assessing the very real risks to visitors and children. There will be no direct action from Art Not Propaganda and we will not be attending on the day. We would advise that families and children steer well clear too.
AN UPDATE, 28 JANUARY 2023
We wrote to Tate 12 days ago to tell them about this petition and to share your comments and concerns. And what did Tate say? Absolutely nothing. Silence from them in a week when the pressure has continued to build. Grassroots feminist and gay rights organisations have joined us in asking Tate to do the right thing. A Baroness wrote to Tate’s Chair of Trustees. Even Rishi Sunak MP has been made aware and has contacted the Department for Culture Media and Sport.
Why Tate’s silence? We have our views on that…
This is a huge story. It’s bigger than a drag queen storyteller and a resource for primary teachers which tells kids not to challenge adults who are in the wrong toilets… (Yes, really!)
We have highlighted just two issues which show that there is a systemic problem here: Tate treats gender ideas as fact and those ideas now run unchecked in everything they do, including in their work for kids. We are going to shine a light on that problem.
Tate say they believe in a diversity of voices. So do we. So let’s make sure ours is heard.
Please continue to SIGN AND SHARE the petition and we will continue to work behind the scenes to build our case against Tate and to stop them from targeting kids with gender propaganda.
Follow us on Twitter for updates @artxpropaganda
************************************************************************************
Tate is the UK’s largest public art gallery. It is actively and one-sidedly promoting gender ideology to children and we’re here to put pressure on them to stop in the name of children’s safety. Please read on and sign if you agree.
This week Tate announced its headline event in the February half-term holiday: Drag Queen Story Hour with Aida H Dee, a free event for children at Tate Britain.
Aida H Dee (real name Seb Samuel) has attracted attention during his tour of British libraries this summer at which he has read his self-published stories about diversity to children.
Here’s why people have been shocked and here’s why we think this event has no place in the families programme at one of our country’s leading art institutions.
Seb Samuel has shared multiple images and comments on social media which raise serious safe-guarding red flags. A teacher would be dismissed for the same. Here are just a few:
> In a post from July 2020, he wrote that ‘love has no age’ - a phrase once used by a group who campaigned to lower the age of sexual consent so that adults could have sex with children.
> in August 2019, he posted an image of a pubescent boy and an old man commenting that gay clubs are wild because you can ‘meet both types and be told both are 23’.
> He claimed in November 2022 that puberty blockers are temporary not permanent, a dangerous view without medical basis.
Drag is a performance for adults not children which depicts women in a hyper-sexualised way. Seb Samuel is a person with extreme views about gender and Tate is giving him access to children in order to promote his own writings on the subject, paid for with public money.
Where are the safe-guarding checks? Why is this being funded with public money? How can parents trust that their kids will be safe at Tate?
Tate’s mission is to increase our enjoyment and understanding of art. How does this do either?
There’s more.
Like many of our public institutions, Tate has adopted gender identity theory wholesale. And for some reason, they think it’s their job to promote the theory to children.
This Tate resource for schools and teachers is chock-full of safe-guarding issues.. Titled I WANT TO SHOW YOU A BODY, the 46-page document is for primary and secondary school children and “aims to encourage gender emancipation within schools”.
https://www.tate.org.uk/art/teaching-resource/thin...
“Don’t tell people they’re in the wrong toilets or changing rooms, they probably know more about their own gender than you do.”
“Remember, trans women are women and should have access to women’s spaces and facilities.”
“It's a good idea to avoid arbitrary gendered divisions such as splitting the girls from the boys in PE or Relationship and Sex Education classes.”
The resource is encouraging teachers to break the law.
It promotes an affirmative approach to gender in children which is entirely out of step with current thinking. The interim report from the Cass Review robustly challenges the orthodoxy of affirmative care. How and why do Tate think they know better?
Tate partnered with trans-activists Gendered Intelligence to create the resource, presumably paying them for their consultancy. At a time when debates around sex and gender are live in our courts of law, in the media and in conversations around the breakfast table, Tate has decided where it stands. Where is the balanced approach here? Where is the analysis? Why has Tate made up its mind already on the defining debate of our era?
It is a critical child safe-guarding issue that this resource is removed now.
Our last example shows you that gender ideology is rife in Tate’s programme for children. Here are their workshops for schools this spring:
https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/schoo...
The artists involved in the programme all share their pronouns. Two of the five teaching artists state that their creative practice explores their transgender experience - how will this translate into the schools workshops? Why does Tate assume that parents are happy for gender theory to be promoted to their kids in this way?
We say it’s long overdue that Tate jumps off the gender bandwagon and starts to think for itself on this subject.
Tate is accountable to us, the public, via Parliament for the services it provides.
In Tate’s own words: “We want to welcome audiences that better reflect our nation and attract a diverse international public.”
So listen up Tate: we are your public and we are here to tell you that inclusive means everybody. That includes the very many people in this country who don’t agree that gender ideology is the law and who don’t agree that children should be exposed to its thinking uncritically. You need to read The Cass Review, you need to remember your duty to the safe-guarding of children and you need to get back to your mission: art.
Stop targeting kids with gender propaganda at Tate.
Please sign below if you agree.
Updates
January 17, 2023
The petition has now reached two thousand five hundred signatures. This level of engagement confirms that many people share our concerns regarding the safeguarding of children at this venue.
Reached 2,500 supporters
January 14, 2023
Reached 1,000 supporters
January 12, 2023
Reached 100 supporters
January 11, 2023
January 11, 2023
The momentum behind this petition is increasing as we approach one hundred signatures. Please direct your contacts to this page so we can reach this initial target today.
939 Comments
As a Lesbian I have always thought drag was offensively misogynistic. I have to wonder why and how adult entertainment is being passed off as appropriate for children under the heading of 'inclusivity'. There is nothing inclusive about a sexualised parody of women .
It is unclear to me how Tate’s decisions comply with the law on child safeguarding. Furthermore, the teaching resource demonstrates that Tate is acting entirely outside of the law and must be held accountable. The teaching resource must be immediately removed.
I’ve taken my children to the Tate half terms for years. As a lesbian parent this gender ideology horrified me and has harmed my children already, it is deeply homophobic and encourages the very worst gay stereotypes as well as disdain for women
As a public institution would it not be wise to consider any future litigation that may arise from you taking an ideological stand on this contentious issue. You are funded by the public who may not be at all happy using public monies to fund such a legal case.
I have never understood the argument that drag for children somehow encourages diversity. Young children seeing a man dressed as a caricature of a woman, including fake breasts, simply assume it's a woman. How sexist and regressive.
Disgusting man
This man is dangerous, violent, misogynistic, oppressive, harsh, discriminatory and cruel. He is a manipulator and, furthermore, a guru making propaganda among young boys and men. The whole society have to stop him before it's too late.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
AN UPDATE, 9 FEBRUARY 2023
Tate are going ahead with a half-term event for young kids fronted by a drag queen who breaches their own safe-guarding rules. We raised these red flags and Tate ignored us. Thousands of you signed our petition. They ignored you too. And now the row has been co-opted by trans rights and far-right extremist groups who are planning on turning up at Tate Britain on Saturday in masks to scream abuse at each other and terrify small kids. Tate think what they’re doing counts as diversity; look how what they are actually creating is division. This isn’t about art; it’s about gender political carnage and Tate have put themselves in the middle of it all without assessing the very real risks to visitors and children. There will be no direct action from Art Not Propaganda and we will not be attending on the day. We would advise that families and children steer well clear too.
AN UPDATE, 28 JANUARY 2023
We wrote to Tate 12 days ago to tell them about this petition and to share your comments and concerns. And what did Tate say? Absolutely nothing. Silence from them in a week when the pressure has continued to build. Grassroots feminist and gay rights organisations have joined us in asking Tate to do the right thing. A Baroness wrote to Tate’s Chair of Trustees. Even Rishi Sunak MP has been made aware and has contacted the Department for Culture Media and Sport.
Why Tate’s silence? We have our views on that…
This is a huge story. It’s bigger than a drag queen storyteller and a resource for primary teachers which tells kids not to challenge adults who are in the wrong toilets… (Yes, really!)
We have highlighted just two issues which show that there is a systemic problem here: Tate treats gender ideas as fact and those ideas now run unchecked in everything they do, including in their work for kids. We are going to shine a light on that problem.
Tate say they believe in a diversity of voices. So do we. So let’s make sure ours is heard.
Please continue to SIGN AND SHARE the petition and we will continue to work behind the scenes to build our case against Tate and to stop them from targeting kids with gender propaganda.
Follow us on Twitter for updates @artxpropaganda
************************************************************************************
Tate is the UK’s largest public art gallery. It is actively and one-sidedly promoting gender ideology to children and we’re here to put pressure on them to stop in the name of children’s safety. Please read on and sign if you agree.
This week Tate announced its headline event in the February half-term holiday: Drag Queen Story Hour with Aida H Dee, a free event for children at Tate Britain.
Aida H Dee (real name Seb Samuel) has attracted attention during his tour of British libraries this summer at which he has read his self-published stories about diversity to children.
Here’s why people have been shocked and here’s why we think this event has no place in the families programme at one of our country’s leading art institutions.
Seb Samuel has shared multiple images and comments on social media which raise serious safe-guarding red flags. A teacher would be dismissed for the same. Here are just a few:
> In a post from July 2020, he wrote that ‘love has no age’ - a phrase once used by a group who campaigned to lower the age of sexual consent so that adults could have sex with children.
> in August 2019, he posted an image of a pubescent boy and an old man commenting that gay clubs are wild because you can ‘meet both types and be told both are 23’.
> He claimed in November 2022 that puberty blockers are temporary not permanent, a dangerous view without medical basis.
Drag is a performance for adults not children which depicts women in a hyper-sexualised way. Seb Samuel is a person with extreme views about gender and Tate is giving him access to children in order to promote his own writings on the subject, paid for with public money.
Where are the safe-guarding checks? Why is this being funded with public money? How can parents trust that their kids will be safe at Tate?
Tate’s mission is to increase our enjoyment and understanding of art. How does this do either?
There’s more.
Like many of our public institutions, Tate has adopted gender identity theory wholesale. And for some reason, they think it’s their job to promote the theory to children.
This Tate resource for schools and teachers is chock-full of safe-guarding issues.. Titled I WANT TO SHOW YOU A BODY, the 46-page document is for primary and secondary school children and “aims to encourage gender emancipation within schools”.
https://www.tate.org.uk/art/teaching-resource/thin...
“Don’t tell people they’re in the wrong toilets or changing rooms, they probably know more about their own gender than you do.”
“Remember, trans women are women and should have access to women’s spaces and facilities.”
“It's a good idea to avoid arbitrary gendered divisions such as splitting the girls from the boys in PE or Relationship and Sex Education classes.”
The resource is encouraging teachers to break the law.
It promotes an affirmative approach to gender in children which is entirely out of step with current thinking. The interim report from the Cass Review robustly challenges the orthodoxy of affirmative care. How and why do Tate think they know better?
Tate partnered with trans-activists Gendered Intelligence to create the resource, presumably paying them for their consultancy. At a time when debates around sex and gender are live in our courts of law, in the media and in conversations around the breakfast table, Tate has decided where it stands. Where is the balanced approach here? Where is the analysis? Why has Tate made up its mind already on the defining debate of our era?
It is a critical child safe-guarding issue that this resource is removed now.
Our last example shows you that gender ideology is rife in Tate’s programme for children. Here are their workshops for schools this spring:
https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/schoo...
The artists involved in the programme all share their pronouns. Two of the five teaching artists state that their creative practice explores their transgender experience - how will this translate into the schools workshops? Why does Tate assume that parents are happy for gender theory to be promoted to their kids in this way?
We say it’s long overdue that Tate jumps off the gender bandwagon and starts to think for itself on this subject.
Tate is accountable to us, the public, via Parliament for the services it provides.
In Tate’s own words: “We want to welcome audiences that better reflect our nation and attract a diverse international public.”
So listen up Tate: we are your public and we are here to tell you that inclusive means everybody. That includes the very many people in this country who don’t agree that gender ideology is the law and who don’t agree that children should be exposed to its thinking uncritically. You need to read The Cass Review, you need to remember your duty to the safe-guarding of children and you need to get back to your mission: art.
Stop targeting kids with gender propaganda at Tate.
Please sign below if you agree.
Updates
January 17, 2023
The petition has now reached two thousand five hundred signatures. This level of engagement confirms that many people share our concerns regarding the safeguarding of children at this venue.
Reached 2,500 supporters
January 14, 2023
Reached 1,000 supporters
January 12, 2023
Reached 100 supporters
January 11, 2023
January 11, 2023
The momentum behind this petition is increasing as we approach one hundred signatures. Please direct your contacts to this page so we can reach this initial target today.
939 Comments
Drag is ‘womanface’. It’s insulting to women and it teaches children that a man in a dress is a woman if he says he is. This messes with children’s heads, with their evolving understanding of reality, and is therefore a safeguarding issue.
As a Lesbian I have always thought drag was offensively misogynistic. I have to wonder why and how adult entertainment is being passed off as appropriate for children under the heading of 'inclusivity'. There is nothing inclusive about a sexualised parody of women .
It is unclear to me how Tate’s decisions comply with the law on child safeguarding. Furthermore, the teaching resource demonstrates that Tate is acting entirely outside of the law and must be held accountable. The teaching resource must be immediately removed.
I’ve taken my children to the Tate half terms for years. As a lesbian parent this gender ideology horrified me and has harmed my children already, it is deeply homophobic and encourages the very worst gay stereotypes as well as disdain for women
As a public institution would it not be wise to consider any future litigation that may arise from you taking an ideological stand on this contentious issue. You are funded by the public who may not be at all happy using public monies to fund such a legal case.
I have never understood the argument that drag for children somehow encourages diversity. Young children seeing a man dressed as a caricature of a woman, including fake breasts, simply assume it's a woman. How sexist and regressive.
Disgusting man
This man is dangerous, violent, misogynistic, oppressive, harsh, discriminatory and cruel. He is a manipulator and, furthermore, a guru making propaganda among young boys and men. The whole society have to stop him before it's too late.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 5,000 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
Drag is ‘womanface’. It’s insulting to women and it teaches children that a man in a dress is a woman if he says he is. This messes with children’s heads, with their evolving understanding of reality, and is therefore a safeguarding issue.