Skip to main content

Stop Private Jet Expansion at Hanscom or Anywhere

2,235 Comments

C
Cynthia Jaquith
3 years ago

Please reconsider; the air traffic over Bedford neighborhoods is already quite a lot to handle!

S
sara wilbur
3 years ago

a terrible idea as we try to control climate gas emissions

L
Laurie Lynn Glasser
3 years ago

please stop... it's not good for the air and surrounding towns are already greatly SUFFERING with LOUD JET NOISE. just stop.

P
Pamela Newton
3 years ago

Please do not allow this to happen. It will not be safe for this region.

D
Diana Rice
3 years ago

No expansion!!!!

A
Anonymous
3 years ago

From Arlington MA

A
Anonymous
3 years ago

Air travel is a large contributor to climate change. Increasing private jet traffic to Hanscom is heading us in the wrong direction.

S
sarah measures
3 years ago

There is no excuse for this development. Stop it now.

A
Aaron Moynahan
3 years ago

I'm against the expansion of private jet service as Hanscom.

L
lijun Tsai
3 years ago

Lexington

M
Michael DiToro
3 years ago

We can do better!

C
Carmen R Verrier
3 years ago

Please NO more expansions of private jet capacity at Hanscom. It's in the center of three communities. It is already at full capacity and traffic is horrendous. NO.. Please

E
Erik Husby
3 years ago

Living under the flight pats, we are subjected to the air and noise pollution of these private planes.

A
Annemarie Calhoun
3 years ago

To ruin the farms in the area with pollution from private jets is a shame. Local food crops are critical during climate change.

P
Poppy Charnalia
3 years ago

Please preserve the earth at all costs.

M
Molly L haskell
3 years ago

Stop this super-emitter, super polluting, super dirty project that brings no discernable benefit to anyone except the 1/10 percenters. Do not allow MassPORT to set up an operation that will pump obscene amounts of fossil fuel-generated CO2 and lead into the air, drain PFAS and de-icing runoff into drinking water, and increase on-the-ground automobile congestion and emissions, merely for the convenience and pleasure of the nose-bleed super rich. No community in the Commonwealth or in the USA should shoulder these environmental costs, especially when weighed against the frivolity of the benefit: exclusive, luxury services for the ultra wealthy.

C
Christine Dorchak
3 years ago

Woods not pollution!

S
Suzanne Morse-Fortier
3 years ago

This would be a climate disaster and a donation to the very wealthy.

C
Charles M Magid
3 years ago

Also, Please only use eplanes at Hanscom

A
Arnold Clickstein
3 years ago

The Hanscom expansion is environmentally unsound.