WE APPEAL to the Board of Directors of the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum to launch a thorough, open investigation and examination of the Eras Committees election process. Tens of thousands of baseball fans from coast to coast feel disenfranchised and disillusioned by a process that has left several potential Hall of Fame members—men with long careers of significant achievement in the majors —on the outside of the doors of Cooperstown looking in.
Fans of many of these men have invested thousands of dollars and thousands of hours of efforts in campaigns on behalf of candidates who they remember with great fondness and respect. They might be more accepting of the results of the elections of recent decades if they saw them as the outcome of a process that was fair, consistent and transparent. But to them, the process meets none of these tests.
Can you call a process that makes the election of anyone highly unlikely to be fair? Given the number of voters, the number of votes available to them, the number of candidates and the high threshold need for election (a 75 percent vote), math experts have said the odds are very small anyone will be elected through this process. Given that only one living ex-player has been chosen since 2001, that seems to be the case.
Can you call a process that includes voters who have publicly stated that no one not elected by the Baseball Writers should be chosen for the Hall as fair?
Can you call a process that seems so heavily dependent on a candidate having a strong advocate on the committee to be fair? This is underscored by the fact that some candidates see their vote totals swing wildly from election to election. In the votes by the baseball writers, candidates have an opportunity to build momentum from year to year, and often see a steady rise in their totals, which often culminates in election. But by only having an opportunity for the veterans once every three years and starting over with a mostly new voting panel, continuity is lost.
Can you call a process that isn’t fully open and accountable fair? The Hall has never fully addressed the denial of Roy Campanella’s right to vote in the 1993 election, which is widely believed to have cost one or more candidates an opportunity at election. More than two decades later, the public saw disturbing echoes of this in the last-minute substitution of Dave Dombrowski for Bob Watson on the committee, something that was announced without explanation and only after the fact. We don’t know with certainty how those changes influenced the outcome of those votes, but the lack of openness in both cases has fueled rumors and questions.
Although the Hall of Fame is a private institution, it holds an important public trust—one that many fans consider to be a sacred trust. It is the repository of our memories of the best men who have played our National Game. We appeal to the hall’s board of directors to take positive steps that will rebuild our shattered faith and give the players whose memories we cherish a fair opportunity for the recognition they deserve.
Updates
June 22, 2015
I spent the entire morning reading through the emails some of you sent me about the absurd voting threshold and honestly my head is spinning because it is so clear how much the history of the game matters to all of us. I have been drafting a letter to the Board to explain exactly why this current setup feels so broken (it is just so frustrating when the math is fundamentally stacked against anyone getting in) and hopefully they actually decide to read it.
Reached 100 supporters
June 22, 2015
111 Comments
I don't understand what happened last year at the last minute that changed the voting and kept Dick Allen from being elected by one vote. Something needs to change in Cooperstown for it to continue to be seen as legitimate in the eyes of baseball fans.
There have been gross inconsistenceies with the Committee vote, and some Committee members say that they don't want to enshrine more players. If they feel that way, they shouldn't be on the Committee.
Consistency is all we ask. What we see is a popularity contest within the sports writers association. Subjective not objective. Bert Blyleven's is a prime example and I throw Gil Hodges into the mix. If one Juicer is elected I'll scream. Please fix this broken system.
As a frequent visitor to the HOF since the 1980's is has become clearly evident that the voting process needs to be examined and overhauled. Last winters travesty of not one elected and Dave Dombroskey's substitution ultimately cost the Veteran's committee of having an in inductee in 2015
The current system just doesn't work. This past year was not only shocking but a disgrace. Hodges, Minoso, Allen and Oliva seemed very obvious to me. The other candidates were worthy too. And now Minnie is dead. Something needs to change or these well deserving men will never get in.
I agree..an example is Rocky Colavito who led MLB in total HRs from 1958-1962 and led the American League in total HRs, RBI, TB, and XBHs from 1957-1966. A Decade Of Dominance and he was overlooked. A tragedy. Yes, the system must be fixed.
Dale Murphy should be in
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
WE APPEAL to the Board of Directors of the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum to launch a thorough, open investigation and examination of the Eras Committees election process. Tens of thousands of baseball fans from coast to coast feel disenfranchised and disillusioned by a process that has left several potential Hall of Fame members—men with long careers of significant achievement in the majors —on the outside of the doors of Cooperstown looking in.
Fans of many of these men have invested thousands of dollars and thousands of hours of efforts in campaigns on behalf of candidates who they remember with great fondness and respect. They might be more accepting of the results of the elections of recent decades if they saw them as the outcome of a process that was fair, consistent and transparent. But to them, the process meets none of these tests.
Can you call a process that makes the election of anyone highly unlikely to be fair? Given the number of voters, the number of votes available to them, the number of candidates and the high threshold need for election (a 75 percent vote), math experts have said the odds are very small anyone will be elected through this process. Given that only one living ex-player has been chosen since 2001, that seems to be the case.
Can you call a process that includes voters who have publicly stated that no one not elected by the Baseball Writers should be chosen for the Hall as fair?
Can you call a process that seems so heavily dependent on a candidate having a strong advocate on the committee to be fair? This is underscored by the fact that some candidates see their vote totals swing wildly from election to election. In the votes by the baseball writers, candidates have an opportunity to build momentum from year to year, and often see a steady rise in their totals, which often culminates in election. But by only having an opportunity for the veterans once every three years and starting over with a mostly new voting panel, continuity is lost.
Can you call a process that isn’t fully open and accountable fair? The Hall has never fully addressed the denial of Roy Campanella’s right to vote in the 1993 election, which is widely believed to have cost one or more candidates an opportunity at election. More than two decades later, the public saw disturbing echoes of this in the last-minute substitution of Dave Dombrowski for Bob Watson on the committee, something that was announced without explanation and only after the fact. We don’t know with certainty how those changes influenced the outcome of those votes, but the lack of openness in both cases has fueled rumors and questions.
Although the Hall of Fame is a private institution, it holds an important public trust—one that many fans consider to be a sacred trust. It is the repository of our memories of the best men who have played our National Game. We appeal to the hall’s board of directors to take positive steps that will rebuild our shattered faith and give the players whose memories we cherish a fair opportunity for the recognition they deserve.
Updates
June 22, 2015
I spent the entire morning reading through the emails some of you sent me about the absurd voting threshold and honestly my head is spinning because it is so clear how much the history of the game matters to all of us. I have been drafting a letter to the Board to explain exactly why this current setup feels so broken (it is just so frustrating when the math is fundamentally stacked against anyone getting in) and hopefully they actually decide to read it.
Reached 100 supporters
June 22, 2015
111 Comments
No living player has been voted in by the Veteran's Committee since Bill Mazeroski in 2003. Let these players enjoy their moment whil they are alive. Yes a change is needed.
I don't understand what happened last year at the last minute that changed the voting and kept Dick Allen from being elected by one vote. Something needs to change in Cooperstown for it to continue to be seen as legitimate in the eyes of baseball fans.
There have been gross inconsistenceies with the Committee vote, and some Committee members say that they don't want to enshrine more players. If they feel that way, they shouldn't be on the Committee.
Consistency is all we ask. What we see is a popularity contest within the sports writers association. Subjective not objective. Bert Blyleven's is a prime example and I throw Gil Hodges into the mix. If one Juicer is elected I'll scream. Please fix this broken system.
As a frequent visitor to the HOF since the 1980's is has become clearly evident that the voting process needs to be examined and overhauled. Last winters travesty of not one elected and Dave Dombroskey's substitution ultimately cost the Veteran's committee of having an in inductee in 2015
The current system just doesn't work. This past year was not only shocking but a disgrace. Hodges, Minoso, Allen and Oliva seemed very obvious to me. The other candidates were worthy too. And now Minnie is dead. Something needs to change or these well deserving men will never get in.
I agree..an example is Rocky Colavito who led MLB in total HRs from 1958-1962 and led the American League in total HRs, RBI, TB, and XBHs from 1957-1966. A Decade Of Dominance and he was overlooked. A tragedy. Yes, the system must be fixed.
Dale Murphy should be in
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 250 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
No living player has been voted in by the Veteran's Committee since Bill Mazeroski in 2003. Let these players enjoy their moment whil they are alive. Yes a change is needed.