Skip to main content

Status: Closed — this petition is no longer accepting signatures.

SMP Basketball Goal Regulations

SMP Basketball Goal Regulations

Closed — 95 supporters Verified

Final supporters

A
Adam J.
K
Krystal R.
L
Laura H.
S
Someone
R
Roxie L.
T
Tracy H.
J
Judith L.
C
Cindy A.
J
John M.
G
Guy P.
+85 more
SG
Started by Susan Grafton 6 years, 3 months ago

Date: May 25, 2020

TO: Sugar Mill Pond Community Management & Sugar Mill Pond HOA Board

RE: Basketball Goals in Sugar Mill Pond

Dear Sir/Madam,

In light of your May 14, 2020 correspondence and fine assessed to David Knight at 204 Shore Drive regarding the basketball goal at the rear of his property and his request thereto, please be advised that we object to your response. David and I share this basketball goal; I bought the goal and David agreed to put it on his property. The goal is used by many children and adults and does not pose a hazard in any way. The goal faces the T in our alley way and is not blocking traffic.

At the March 11, 2014 Homeowner’s Association Board Meeting, the board expanded the regulations for basketball goals as addressed by Teddy Beaullieu. At that time, this particular goal was approved by Teddy and it has been in this spot since that time. If you would like a copy of those minutes, I'll be happy to furnish you with those. The goal did break and was replaced in December 2019 but the location remained the same. As of a few months ago, David began getting letters with requesting that the goal be taken down; recently, he was fined.

It has come to light that many of the residents in this community have the same objections to the issue with basketball goals as we do and I write this on behalf of myself, David and Michelle Knight, and the below residents in the community of Sugar Mill Pond.

It is our understanding that, if a resident has a basketball goal, the goal is to be portable, facing the driveway or to be moved in and out for each use. The goals are not to be attached to the property in any way (i.e. cemented in or attached to the home).

First of all, to request that a 10 foot basketball goal be moved in and out after each use, is not practical; these types of goals are usually weighted down with sand, rock, or water in order to be stable for use; even if they are not weighted down, to ask someone to move a large basketball goal in and out is absolutely ridiculous. Our kids should be able to go play when they want to. Some of these kids are home with babysitters after school and some have single moms who simply cannot move these goals.

With regard to the issue of the goal facing the driveway, that is also not practical. Most of our driveways are short and many of our driveways (mine and David’s) are on a rather steep incline making it impossible for the playing of basketball. Again, another impractical rule.

I have been told that one of the reasons that basketball goals are objected to is to discourage children from playing in the alley. We understand that but, we have no other option. It has been brought to the attention of Community Management and the HOA Board that a basketball court (or even a ½ court) in Palfrey Park would be great. Many residents have even agreed to contribute to same. However, we have been told that a basketball court in the park would attract people not living in Sugar Mill Pond. There is a very easy remedy to this; put a locked gate around the court like we have with the pool and signs that say “residents only.” Allow residents only or residents with 1-2 guests.

Many of us have elementary, preteen, and high school age children who need healthy activities and outlets instead of video games and electronic devices. There are many activities in this neighborhood for young children and adults. However, these kids who need healthy activities the most are overlooked and parents are frustrated. Easter egg hunts, Santa Clause, train rides, a playground, and our small swimming pool are not appealing to this age group of kids. Kids this age really need healthy activities and you are taking that away from them leaving them no choice but to go inside and play video games or watch TV.

We request that either our goals be approved as long as they are not blocking traffic or a hazard and the rules implemented are reasonable and practical. If this is not possible, we request that a location for a basketball court or a ½ court be found for these kids and built.

Updates

May 26, 2020

The board has been silent since I sent over those meeting minutes from six years ago. It is frustrating to watch them ignore the history of our neighborhood while they keep threatening my neighbors with fines for a goal they already approved.

May 26, 2020

Seeing this much support from neighbors proves that our push to keep the rims up is about more than just a single game. It hits home to see so many families backing us because they know how much this goal brings the alley to life. We are taking this momentum straight to the board.

17 Comments

J
Jason Werner
6 years ago Featured

My kids use that hoop all the time. Need to keep it up because it keeps them busy outside instead of on video games all day. Fine is ridiculous since it was already cleared years ago!

T
Tim Guillory
6 years ago Featured

There are so many variations of this policy. I can think of several in my part of the subdivision. No consistency. I drove by the goal in question and read Christine's comment. I too, move to allow the goal to remain and remove the fine from David's account!

P
Paula West
6 years ago Featured

I agree that basketball goals should be allowed as stated, and, or a basketball court be built at the park for residents and their guests only.

C
Colleen Eckelberger
6 years ago Featured

Also, some who use the hoops are athletes using for practice. Why would we not allow that?

L
Lacey and Mike Reis
6 years ago Featured

I believe there should not be any restrictions requarding basketball goals. The hoa needs to address this matter asap.

D
Dawn Fournier
6 years ago Featured

Totally agree with this. I’ve lived here for almost 10 years and goals have previously been allowed. This should be discussed and resolved at an annual meeting.

A
Adam Juckett
6 years ago

208 Shore

J
Judith LaDousa
6 years ago

Agree!