Sign to Oppose A High-Speed Rail Bypass Through Southeastern Connecticut and Rhode Island
14 Comments
J
Jason Rondeau
9 years ago
The rails we have already are just fine.
D
Douglas DeLapp
9 years ago
I am against a high speed rail bypass through southeastern CT.
M
Matt Beaudoin
9 years ago
Featured
I support a modern rail system, The bypass approach fails to use the existing system in a more tech savy way. The billions of dollars wasted on this line on a map could be done with 10% of the money put into improving on the systems we already have. World class aquarium, single source water supplies, sovereign lands, and untold billions in personal property all destroyed for no reason that benefits the local or the federal economy. Plans like these have no upside, only destruction to the economy and ecology of the region
M
Michelle Coope
9 years ago
This is totally destructive to our community!
K
Kimberley Buck
9 years ago
Featured
Please do not go forward with the proposed by-pass. The route passes through, and would irreparably harm, resources that are essential to the communities impacted. There is no 'greater good' that would begin to balance that negative result.
S
Suzanne Machinski
10 years ago
This should not even be an option!
W
William Quirk
10 years ago
Featured
What are you thinking? I'm apoplectic you 1) did not include towns along this corridor in the planning; 2) think this is profitable, even though jetblues from Boston to NY or Philly are $90, fr , far below the cost of the Acela 3) do not realize the glory of rail is the slow but open accessibility; 4) that the coastal line along the SE Connecticut region is a precious and most beautiful and rare rail line; 5) that you are doubling the environmental impact, not only inland but on the coast, when your rail organization will invariably sell rights to private development; 6) destroy inland and tourist attractions. Shame on you!
M
Margo Burke
10 years ago
So many people use this train to stop at seaside connections on the heaviest traveled line between NY & Boston . 95 is scary it's so congested. People need this alternative. Amtrack is the only other choice. It's been going along this route forever w out any damage to our precious coastline.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Update what is there. No need to tear down historic places for a new system.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Must fight this very hard
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Featured
This would be a severe disruption of businesses here in the area and a huge loss of tourism for our area.
S
State Rep Aundre Bumgardner
10 years ago
Featured
Outstanding work, SECOAST. Advocating for a 21st century rail network as well protecting open space and historic preservation are not mutually exclusive.
J
john Mershon
10 years ago
A total waste of money. Why are they considering expansion when they have trouble maintaining what they have
J
Jessica Morrissey
10 years ago
Featured
I am opposed to the FRA's plan to reroute the RR through Old Lyme. It would be a desecration of Historical landmarks.
The rails we have already are just fine.
I am against a high speed rail bypass through southeastern CT.
I support a modern rail system, The bypass approach fails to use the existing system in a more tech savy way. The billions of dollars wasted on this line on a map could be done with 10% of the money put into improving on the systems we already have. World class aquarium, single source water supplies, sovereign lands, and untold billions in personal property all destroyed for no reason that benefits the local or the federal economy. Plans like these have no upside, only destruction to the economy and ecology of the region
This is totally destructive to our community!
Please do not go forward with the proposed by-pass. The route passes through, and would irreparably harm, resources that are essential to the communities impacted. There is no 'greater good' that would begin to balance that negative result.
This should not even be an option!
What are you thinking? I'm apoplectic you 1) did not include towns along this corridor in the planning; 2) think this is profitable, even though jetblues from Boston to NY or Philly are $90, fr , far below the cost of the Acela 3) do not realize the glory of rail is the slow but open accessibility; 4) that the coastal line along the SE Connecticut region is a precious and most beautiful and rare rail line; 5) that you are doubling the environmental impact, not only inland but on the coast, when your rail organization will invariably sell rights to private development; 6) destroy inland and tourist attractions. Shame on you!
So many people use this train to stop at seaside connections on the heaviest traveled line between NY & Boston . 95 is scary it's so congested. People need this alternative. Amtrack is the only other choice. It's been going along this route forever w out any damage to our precious coastline.
Update what is there. No need to tear down historic places for a new system.
Must fight this very hard
This would be a severe disruption of businesses here in the area and a huge loss of tourism for our area.
Outstanding work, SECOAST. Advocating for a 21st century rail network as well protecting open space and historic preservation are not mutually exclusive.
A total waste of money. Why are they considering expansion when they have trouble maintaining what they have
I am opposed to the FRA's plan to reroute the RR through Old Lyme. It would be a desecration of Historical landmarks.