Unjust scoring, scaling and normalisation should be done
P
Prince
5 years ago
I assumed 50+ %ile but its 24%ile
H
harshvardhan kariwala
5 years ago
Not up to the mark
M
Manjunath
5 years ago
any common man can understand that the paper was of varying difficulty levels across 3 slots ..they are telling some science based questions in slot 1 some trignometry in slot 2 and some lengthy verbal questions in slot 3 are all same ? this is totally unfair and not expected from a management institute like symbiosis
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
The score vs percentile was very unfair for 6th and 9th slot as paper was tough, lengthy.So our attempts were less.So scaling should have been done according to slots
S
Suman Shekhar
5 years ago
Normalisation should be done
B
BHIRAVA JOSYULA MEGHANA
5 years ago
Percentile was less than expected, we need normalization to be done properly
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Snap is scam
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Give grace marks
H
Heena Agarwal
5 years ago
Please provide us atleast the answer sheet and give us fair marks
P
PRABHAKAR MISHRA
5 years ago
SNAP authority is corrupt and senseless
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
This is injustice !! Symbiosis is not being fair and transparent. How can a management institute be so biased??
T
Tanmay Anand
5 years ago
Because of not doing the normalization i think that they had an advantage in the admission and truely snap is now being unfair with the future of students
S
Sanketh Bhat
5 years ago
There was a definite difference in the level of difficulty across the 3 slots in SNAP this year. The first slot being the easiest and the 3rd slot the toughest. It would be very evident if the 98+ percentile scores and the respective slot in which it was achieved, are analyzed.
S
Shivanee rai
5 years ago
Please we worked really hard the whole year it is my 3rd attempt I am trying really hard to get admsn in snap..this is unfair,normalize the score
S
Shikha
5 years ago
Paper was hella tough
Z
Zubin pahuja
5 years ago
I zubin pahuja sign this petition for not getting the slot 3 proper result as we all students expected normalisation is what we atleast thought
We demand normalised result
Unjust scoring, scaling and normalisation should be done
I assumed 50+ %ile but its 24%ile
Not up to the mark
any common man can understand that the paper was of varying difficulty levels across 3 slots ..they are telling some science based questions in slot 1 some trignometry in slot 2 and some lengthy verbal questions in slot 3 are all same ? this is totally unfair and not expected from a management institute like symbiosis
The score vs percentile was very unfair for 6th and 9th slot as paper was tough, lengthy.So our attempts were less.So scaling should have been done according to slots
Normalisation should be done
Percentile was less than expected, we need normalization to be done properly
Snap is scam
Give grace marks
Please provide us atleast the answer sheet and give us fair marks
SNAP authority is corrupt and senseless
This is injustice !! Symbiosis is not being fair and transparent. How can a management institute be so biased??
Because of not doing the normalization i think that they had an advantage in the admission and truely snap is now being unfair with the future of students
There was a definite difference in the level of difficulty across the 3 slots in SNAP this year. The first slot being the easiest and the 3rd slot the toughest. It would be very evident if the 98+ percentile scores and the respective slot in which it was achieved, are analyzed.
Please we worked really hard the whole year it is my 3rd attempt I am trying really hard to get admsn in snap..this is unfair,normalize the score
Paper was hella tough
I zubin pahuja sign this petition for not getting the slot 3 proper result as we all students expected normalisation is what we atleast thought
Symboissis Institute should do normalization
This is unacceptable