slot 3 was more difficult so normalisation should have been done
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
I applied for 3rd slot it was much tricky and time consuming specifically in quant I was only able to attempt 36in all but I score literally 0is quant due to negative marking which is really not believed by me please help
M
Manmeet
5 years ago
This is indeed injustice.Either snap should normalise thr score or take out slot wise cut off. the percentiles are ambiguous
Admission should be done the basis of marks not percentiles.
N
Nirupam Biswas
5 years ago
We want normalisation!
A
Amit Kumar Pandey
5 years ago
Normalisation
A
Aniruddha Pawgi
5 years ago
Totally disappointed with snap .
slot 3 was toughest. Everybody cannot afford to give snap twice.
So please look into it and normalize the score.
M
Manshu Jain
5 years ago
The scaling should be done for all 3 slots , as the diffulty level of 9 Jan exam was higher than 20 Dec and 6 Jan.
Y
Yash Santoshi
5 years ago
Thanks Symbiosis
K
Kevin J Kurien
5 years ago
Kindly bring back normalization of scores
A
Amritesh Padhi
5 years ago
The score was unexpected. SNAP authority should reconsider it..
V
Vikas Kumar
5 years ago
If all the papers were of same difficulty kindly make public marks of all students
N
Naman Taneja
5 years ago
I strongly believe that there should be a normalization to make results fair
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Normalization required
A
ASHUTOSH PANIGRAHI
5 years ago
Sir, I was expecting 70 percentile
A
Anisha mahanty
5 years ago
Normalisation should be done.
A
Aishwarya
5 years ago
It's unfair for slot 3 students not only because the scores was not normalised but also this gave a huge advantage for slot 1 students to boost their percentile by increasing the sample data.
Y
Yogesh Singh
5 years ago
Normalisation please.....
D
Deba Kumar Narzary
5 years ago
Slot 3 was the toughest of the 3 slots. So, I request the SNAP authorities to scale up the 3rd slot.
Please do thi
I attempted slot 3 exam.
slot 3 was more difficult so normalisation should have been done
I applied for 3rd slot it was much tricky and time consuming specifically in quant I was only able to attempt 36in all but I score literally 0is quant due to negative marking which is really not believed by me please help
This is indeed injustice.Either snap should normalise thr score or take out slot wise cut off. the percentiles are ambiguous Admission should be done the basis of marks not percentiles.
We want normalisation!
Normalisation
Totally disappointed with snap . slot 3 was toughest. Everybody cannot afford to give snap twice. So please look into it and normalize the score.
The scaling should be done for all 3 slots , as the diffulty level of 9 Jan exam was higher than 20 Dec and 6 Jan.
Thanks Symbiosis
Kindly bring back normalization of scores
The score was unexpected. SNAP authority should reconsider it..
If all the papers were of same difficulty kindly make public marks of all students
I strongly believe that there should be a normalization to make results fair
Normalization required
Sir, I was expecting 70 percentile
Normalisation should be done.
It's unfair for slot 3 students not only because the scores was not normalised but also this gave a huge advantage for slot 1 students to boost their percentile by increasing the sample data.
Normalisation please.....
Slot 3 was the toughest of the 3 slots. So, I request the SNAP authorities to scale up the 3rd slot.