Intelligent progress to protect the character of a great community requires careful attention to details to ensure the potential for future compounding problems are not initiated today. Current CSO should not be approved.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
No on CSO
R
Robert Rushton
10 years ago
I am against the CSO.
B
Barbara Taylor
10 years ago
I am against the CSO .
M
Martha Haddon
10 years ago
No, no, no! No high density, no manipulation of the numbers, keep Milton simple and beautiful and spacious.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I say no to high density neighborhoods. Please help keep Milton different and special!!
D
Drew Blanchard
10 years ago
Please do not approve this ordinance.
T
Tanya Ryder
10 years ago
No CSO
C
Caroline Werkheiser
10 years ago
We do not want high density neighborhoods in Milton!
U
Uday Patel
10 years ago
Opposed to the Milton CSO proposal.
L
Lance Hale
10 years ago
I do not want the CSO to be approved
S
Stephanie Cates
10 years ago
NO CSO!!!!
A
Anna Johnson
10 years ago
I voted to approve the city of Milton to keep this type of over development and high density housing out of our town. Preserve not destroy our rural way of life!
N
Niraj Kumar, Milton
10 years ago
Primary intent of forming Milton and thus the city council was to PRESERVE the nature of the community. Which simply means do nothing to change it.
That is it, putting lots of words, over-complicating and making the proposal obscure does not change the intent of proposal.
It is against the purpose of Milton city's formation and vision promised by elected representatives, it SHOULD NOT be passed.
M
Mary P. Schick
10 years ago
If you live in Milton and drive in Milton: there is no way to pas the current CSO.
Until the projected maximal population of Milton CARS is asssessed, there can be no appropriate CSO to consider. It is the projected CAR TRAFFIC that the roads can handle that dictates the CSO that can be approved for. we are already reaching CAR POPULATION saturation NOW due to single lane roads in Milton.
R
Roland Ebright
10 years ago
Mayor and council. Keep your promise if a rural Milton. I oppose the current CSO and its future versions with similar density. What are you hiding with no public input on future CSO requests and ignoring the planning commission recommendations?
J
Julie Beane
10 years ago
Milton is a beautiful rural place to live and I would like it to remain that way. I oppose the current CSO.
M
Melissa Cohen
10 years ago
Unfortunately, the details could not be nailed down properly to protect what we've established here in Milton. I'm in favor of open space and getting land owners/developers to put in subdivisions with more preservation space, but not with the problems in the current CSO.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I agree with the planning commission and their denial of the CSO 3 times.
Property owner for 30 years and oppose the CSO
Intelligent progress to protect the character of a great community requires careful attention to details to ensure the potential for future compounding problems are not initiated today. Current CSO should not be approved.
No on CSO
I am against the CSO.
I am against the CSO .
No, no, no! No high density, no manipulation of the numbers, keep Milton simple and beautiful and spacious.
I say no to high density neighborhoods. Please help keep Milton different and special!!
Please do not approve this ordinance.
No CSO
We do not want high density neighborhoods in Milton!
Opposed to the Milton CSO proposal.
I do not want the CSO to be approved
NO CSO!!!!
I voted to approve the city of Milton to keep this type of over development and high density housing out of our town. Preserve not destroy our rural way of life!
Primary intent of forming Milton and thus the city council was to PRESERVE the nature of the community. Which simply means do nothing to change it. That is it, putting lots of words, over-complicating and making the proposal obscure does not change the intent of proposal. It is against the purpose of Milton city's formation and vision promised by elected representatives, it SHOULD NOT be passed.
If you live in Milton and drive in Milton: there is no way to pas the current CSO. Until the projected maximal population of Milton CARS is asssessed, there can be no appropriate CSO to consider. It is the projected CAR TRAFFIC that the roads can handle that dictates the CSO that can be approved for. we are already reaching CAR POPULATION saturation NOW due to single lane roads in Milton.
Mayor and council. Keep your promise if a rural Milton. I oppose the current CSO and its future versions with similar density. What are you hiding with no public input on future CSO requests and ignoring the planning commission recommendations?
Milton is a beautiful rural place to live and I would like it to remain that way. I oppose the current CSO.
Unfortunately, the details could not be nailed down properly to protect what we've established here in Milton. I'm in favor of open space and getting land owners/developers to put in subdivisions with more preservation space, but not with the problems in the current CSO.
I agree with the planning commission and their denial of the CSO 3 times.