Say No to Pleasant Valley Ranch, a Small Lot-Large Density Development in Williamson Valley
96 Comments
L
Linda Russell
2 years ago
This development is not consistent with the area. Existing infrastructure can not support the level of the density planned.
J
Jeanine Davis
2 years ago
No no no to PVR
J
jerry lynn casebolt
2 years ago
At least be responsible to have a minimum of 10 acres
T
Tim Hole
2 years ago
Too much traffic on Williamson Valley Road, strain on ground water resources. NO to PVR.
J
Jim Rose
2 years ago
I say no to the Pleasant Valley Ranch development.
J
Jeannie Fornara
2 years ago
No petition
J
Jacqueline Decker
2 years ago
Too much development
K
Kevin Hill
2 years ago
This small lot ranch is a horrible idea! It will effect the water, a lot more traffic, impact life and change the quiet dynamics of area. There is zero benefits. NO to Pleasant Valley Ranch
A
Anonymous
2 years ago
Featured
Not compatible with the density or quality of life of this area.
Could create higher density pressures on existing low density properties. "If they can do it why can't I" for example
J
James Sheehan
2 years ago
This development is not compatible with the existing character of the area. PVR would further stress our ground water resources, roads and fire protection.
B
Beth Conley
2 years ago
I am very concerned about the water as related to fires. Additionally septic systems polluting water supplies
V
Vera Leonard
2 years ago
Too dense for rural development
L
Lynn Giddens
2 years ago
I have concern about insufficient fire support and septic/water
B
Barbara Sheehan
2 years ago
High density developments do NOT belong in our area, this would be inappropriate due to wells and sewage issues .
S
Sylvia Hill
2 years ago
Very concerned about impact to water, road traffic and disruption of area. NO.
C
Cathy J Crawford
2 years ago
This proposed development is incompatible with existing development in Williamson Valley. This must be stopped!
M
Mark Olejnik
2 years ago
Please prevent the project from moving ahead.
K
King and Jeanine Davis
2 years ago
Absolutely no. It will destroy the ranching history of this area and replace it with cars and people.
A
Anonymous
2 years ago
Definitely don't need that much more traffic out here.
P
Patricia Kloch
2 years ago
The aquifer is already stressed and this proposed development would only make things worse. No on Pleasant Valley Ranch Project!
This development is not consistent with the area. Existing infrastructure can not support the level of the density planned.
No no no to PVR
At least be responsible to have a minimum of 10 acres
Too much traffic on Williamson Valley Road, strain on ground water resources. NO to PVR.
I say no to the Pleasant Valley Ranch development.
No petition
Too much development
This small lot ranch is a horrible idea! It will effect the water, a lot more traffic, impact life and change the quiet dynamics of area. There is zero benefits. NO to Pleasant Valley Ranch
Not compatible with the density or quality of life of this area. Could create higher density pressures on existing low density properties. "If they can do it why can't I" for example
This development is not compatible with the existing character of the area. PVR would further stress our ground water resources, roads and fire protection.
I am very concerned about the water as related to fires. Additionally septic systems polluting water supplies
Too dense for rural development
I have concern about insufficient fire support and septic/water
High density developments do NOT belong in our area, this would be inappropriate due to wells and sewage issues .
Very concerned about impact to water, road traffic and disruption of area. NO.
This proposed development is incompatible with existing development in Williamson Valley. This must be stopped!
Please prevent the project from moving ahead.
Absolutely no. It will destroy the ranching history of this area and replace it with cars and people.
Definitely don't need that much more traffic out here.
The aquifer is already stressed and this proposed development would only make things worse. No on Pleasant Valley Ranch Project!