Say NO to Euro link 5 industrial estate on the entrance to the estate
207 Comments
J
J BLAKE AND H BLAKE
9 years ago
strongly object.we have enough lorries and buses parking in swale way before we get to the industrial estate now !! we need a shop ,doctors and a postbox[[it's unbelieveable on a big estate like this there isn't one] by the time more houses are built there will be enough traffic without eurolink 5!! when we bought our house we had no idea it would be spoilt by all the building going on now,the value of our houses will definitely fall.we want to live in a village not an industrial park.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
No more industrial estates without the correct road infrastructure and allowing residents and their families to enjoy the safety, peace and quiet they deserve.
D
Debbie B
9 years ago
We don't want this built. Leave what little countryside if left please
T
Tanya williams
9 years ago
I strongly object yo this neing built. Id rather see an empy field to be honest
D
Doris harvey
9 years ago
This will simply ruin what countryside is left around our community-Great Easthall. I moved here to enjoy the peace and tranquility that this part of Kent has to offer. I do not want a noisy, air-polluting 28 acre industrial park built right next door. This was never in the plans for the estate. It will ruin the area and just make our new village be surrounded by industry! This should not be happening! Put the thousands of residents first for once!
R
robert knights
9 years ago
Featured
Me and my girlfriend are objecting the expansion of Eurolink, because of the Road traffic congestion. My other concern is the amount of extra foreign lorry drivers parking overnight who will be delivering to the industrial estate.
S
Sally-Anne Heathfield
9 years ago
No more the country side in this area will be non exsistant
M
Matt Brooks
9 years ago
The industrial estate is already massive, it's not what people were sold when they bought there house !!
D
Dannea Wright
9 years ago
Think of the residents
S
Stevejf1977
9 years ago
I'm totally against Euro 5 being built; firstly for the amount of additional noise & pollution it will cause. There is already plenty of evidence between diesel fumes & adverse health implications, I don't want my children exposed where possible and believe this will increase both significantly. Secondly the roads are already rammed with numerous lorries (even buses) parked up frequently on entry to the site. Rather than add to more industrial units the estate would be better served with a doctors, shop and school. It's also upsetting to see the great country side being scaled back so dramatically where there were many nice dog walks in the area, not so much anymore.
It beggars belief that we need more warehouses when many are all ready empty else where on the eurolink. Shouldn't the planners be planning to improve the area for the towns people and not their own pockets!
P
Paul Pearl
9 years ago
I strongly object to this extension of the Eurolink Estate. The existing infrastructure is not coping, to add more units is madness.
Surrounding a residential housing estate with industrial units is never a good idea, and brings many safety issues with it, especially during any emergency situations such as Fires or Chemical Spillages!
R
Rose Hills
9 years ago
I am against the building of Euro link industrial estate as I believe it will not bring any beneficial to our village.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
I am appalled at the intention to industrialise further the area round Great East Hall. It has taken years to achieve a sense of community and improved facilities for the residents.
This will be under threat if the proposed developments take place.
The road network will not take the increased volume of traffic, as the relief road which has been promised has still not been built.
There are many new houses being built close to the proposed Euro link 5. With houses comes more car users and without a relief road to allow traffic to exit there will be massive traffic problems that will effect Sittingbourne at a time when it is about to start its regeneration.
If this issue is not handled correctly the whole regeneration of Sittingbourne could hang in the balance.
T
Tracey
9 years ago
Strongly object please put safety 1st.
B
Bobby jacob
9 years ago
I feel that having a the industrial aite at the entance would lower the value of the house ruin the view and is less need than local amneties
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
Featured
Strongly object. Will make a quite road a busy road, unable to let the kids go to the park because of all the lorries and busyest of the road, unable to walk the dogs and it will kill all the wildlife alive around that area.
I
I P
9 years ago
No
L
Larisa
9 years ago
No to Eurolink 5 industrial estate
C
Colin frost
9 years ago
Strongly object to this!!!
L
Leona Murray
9 years ago
strongly object. I worry about the pollution and noise It is going to cause. this is an expanding village not an industrial park. Also it will and I worry about how it will affect the value of my house.
strongly object.we have enough lorries and buses parking in swale way before we get to the industrial estate now !! we need a shop ,doctors and a postbox[[it's unbelieveable on a big estate like this there isn't one] by the time more houses are built there will be enough traffic without eurolink 5!! when we bought our house we had no idea it would be spoilt by all the building going on now,the value of our houses will definitely fall.we want to live in a village not an industrial park.
No more industrial estates without the correct road infrastructure and allowing residents and their families to enjoy the safety, peace and quiet they deserve.
We don't want this built. Leave what little countryside if left please
I strongly object yo this neing built. Id rather see an empy field to be honest
This will simply ruin what countryside is left around our community-Great Easthall. I moved here to enjoy the peace and tranquility that this part of Kent has to offer. I do not want a noisy, air-polluting 28 acre industrial park built right next door. This was never in the plans for the estate. It will ruin the area and just make our new village be surrounded by industry! This should not be happening! Put the thousands of residents first for once!
Me and my girlfriend are objecting the expansion of Eurolink, because of the Road traffic congestion. My other concern is the amount of extra foreign lorry drivers parking overnight who will be delivering to the industrial estate.
No more the country side in this area will be non exsistant
The industrial estate is already massive, it's not what people were sold when they bought there house !!
Think of the residents
I'm totally against Euro 5 being built; firstly for the amount of additional noise & pollution it will cause. There is already plenty of evidence between diesel fumes & adverse health implications, I don't want my children exposed where possible and believe this will increase both significantly. Secondly the roads are already rammed with numerous lorries (even buses) parked up frequently on entry to the site. Rather than add to more industrial units the estate would be better served with a doctors, shop and school. It's also upsetting to see the great country side being scaled back so dramatically where there were many nice dog walks in the area, not so much anymore. It beggars belief that we need more warehouses when many are all ready empty else where on the eurolink. Shouldn't the planners be planning to improve the area for the towns people and not their own pockets!
I strongly object to this extension of the Eurolink Estate. The existing infrastructure is not coping, to add more units is madness. Surrounding a residential housing estate with industrial units is never a good idea, and brings many safety issues with it, especially during any emergency situations such as Fires or Chemical Spillages!
I am against the building of Euro link industrial estate as I believe it will not bring any beneficial to our village.
I am appalled at the intention to industrialise further the area round Great East Hall. It has taken years to achieve a sense of community and improved facilities for the residents. This will be under threat if the proposed developments take place. The road network will not take the increased volume of traffic, as the relief road which has been promised has still not been built. There are many new houses being built close to the proposed Euro link 5. With houses comes more car users and without a relief road to allow traffic to exit there will be massive traffic problems that will effect Sittingbourne at a time when it is about to start its regeneration. If this issue is not handled correctly the whole regeneration of Sittingbourne could hang in the balance.
Strongly object please put safety 1st.
I feel that having a the industrial aite at the entance would lower the value of the house ruin the view and is less need than local amneties
Strongly object. Will make a quite road a busy road, unable to let the kids go to the park because of all the lorries and busyest of the road, unable to walk the dogs and it will kill all the wildlife alive around that area.
No
No to Eurolink 5 industrial estate
Strongly object to this!!!
strongly object. I worry about the pollution and noise It is going to cause. this is an expanding village not an industrial park. Also it will and I worry about how it will affect the value of my house.