We all have a voice in the business of our neighborhood, county, state and national business. By signing our petition, you will help the Laurel Ridge community shout loud and clear we do not support the Interim Superintendent Ramona Tyson's Plan for redistricting.
Laurel Ridge Elementary Redistricting Arguments:
The proposed removal of 70 students from Laurel Ridge
Elementary to McLendon Elementary is in direct conflict with DeKalb County
School's stated goals and
criteria:
1. LRES doesn't meet the
county's own criteria for redistricting:
According to the district's frequently cited criteria, DeKalb County
schools at or below 75% building utilization and those at or above 110% building
utilization are eligible for redistricting. Laurel Ridge
is currently at 80% utilization. Under the county's own
requirements, our current attendance area should not have been adjusted. Why, under the
current proposal, have attendance lines been drawn to remove Lindmoor Woods students
from the Laurel Ridge attendance area and send them to
McClendon? The redrawing of these lines was not
introduced in either of the two initial plans. What has inspired it now?
2. Removing the
students reduces facility
utilization:
Removing these 70 students from LRES will bring the school's utilization down to 77%--dangerously
close to the 75% cut-off that triggers a school's consolidation. If the
county's goal is to bring a school’s enrollment up to 450, why is it taking Laurel Ridge
in the opposite direction?
3. Removing these
students represents no cost savings to the county:
State funding for schools is based on county-wide
enrollment—not on how many seats at a particular school are filled. (Quote from Joe Martin needed). The
cost savings across the county plan represent facility operational costs from
closures. But since LRES will remain open for all the rest of its attendees, moving these 70 students, ruining community
cohesion and destabilizing the educational experience for the affected families
exacts a significant human cost, but
doesn't save the county or its taxpayers a single penny. The change represents
neither an immediate need NOR a strategic need.
4. Moving the
students destroys community cohesion & school leadership
The neighborhood of Lindmoor Woods, which is the area most
affected, has been attending LRES for 22 years, since the closure of Rehoboth Elementary School on Lawrenceville Hwy. This proposed second redistricting of the Lindmoor Woods neighborhood is in
contradiction to Board Policy AD Secondary Criteria “Previous Redistricting”
found in slide #5 of the presentation
of the January 3 meeting. The
traditional social flow of this community, two generations strong, would be
significantly disrupted by cutting these families off from Laurel Ridge, its neighborhood
school and community centerpiece for more than two decades. Leadership is especially necessary when new
students from Medlock are arriving next August. Most of the Laurel Ridge
standing and incoming PTA Executive Board would be removed from the school
under this current plan.
5. Keeping these
students at Laurel
Ridge makes only a minor change to McLendon enrollment.
Under the Interim-Superintendent's proposal, Laurel Ridge
would have a 77% capacity enrollment.
Keeping those students in the Laurel
Ridge attendance area
would adjust McLendon capacity enrollment to 79%. That leaves a minor difference between the
two schools, yet you are disrupting an established community and displacing 70
students unnecessarily.
6. Moving these students is premature:
Since the county has not revealed the details of its
long-term plan for any of these affected schools, removing these students from
LRES is premature. In fact, LRES has not even had its Facility Assessment
visit, scheduled for 2/24, so how many other parts of this decision are being
made prematurely?
7. Our alternate plan -- Leave these students
at their neighborhood school where they belong and are thriving.
Keep the currently enrolled students in the Lindmoor Woods
neighborhood in the Laurel
Ridge attendance area. Ours are interlacing communities that share
friends, family, sports teams, churches, scout troops and places where we eat,
shop and have fun together. Disrupting that traditional connectedness is both unnecessary
and destructive.
This plan makes zero sense for our kids. My daughter has her friends at this school and moving her now would be so stressful. Leave our community alone!