Complete replacement is unnecessary. A few alterations would improve access for those with mobility impairments.
B
Barbara Smyth
11 years ago
Please do not destroy history and cherished memories. The ampitheater is a focus point for all Chautauquans. Destruction of this historical building will a a great tragedy.
C
Christine Nelson-Scherman
11 years ago
Chautauqua Institution shoul uphold it reputation for intelligent high qualty cultural experiences and not try to copete with the Salmanca Casino
G
Gustaf Applequist
11 years ago
I would just like to feel like the administration is being completely transparent with the public. I would really like to see the old structure stay in place, however, I understand that as structures age they start to weaken structurally. Is this the case? Why. Does the current structure need to be replaced? Is it in danger of falling down?
L
L. Roger Lee
11 years ago
don't undo history
G
Gerald W Smagacz
11 years ago
Historic structures should be preserved, not remuddeled.
N
Nancy Kingsley
11 years ago
Preserve the Amp in its current conditions.
A
Anne Kuell
11 years ago
This was a part of my childhood! The symphony on Sunday taught me to love classical Music.
S
Sandy Micchia
11 years ago
Visited Chautauqua this summer and had the wonderful experience of listening to the orchestra rehersal for the 4th of July venue. What a lost for everyone should the Amphitheater be demolisted.
J
Janet Darnell
11 years ago
I graduated here in 1972 and worked at Chautauqua in '70,'71 & '72 ~ so many great memories at teh amphitheater ~ sitting alone in silence, with a friend or being entertained. I will NEVER forget it's beauty.
D
Douglas Vanstrom
11 years ago
you cannot replace historic significance
D
Debbie Rapp
11 years ago
My first job ever was cleaning the Amp every morning. The thought of this beautiful structure being replaced is heartbreaking. Please save this landmark for another 120 years for generation to enjoy!
B
Beth Manor
11 years ago
please leave amp alone except for necessary repairs
R
Ron Kelly
11 years ago
As a Chautauquan I am deeply saddened by this. As a professional with a Masters degree in City and Regional Planning I also question the process also and decision making behind the project.
H
H Oliver
11 years ago
On a very personal note...I really hate submitting my comments but feel in all good conscience I must. What a shame that this project, which could have been the accomplishment of the century, has now become a stain on who we are and what we stand for...an open, transparent community that takes pride in upholding these ideals. This is a sad time for Chautauqua.
H
Hale
11 years ago
. As I write my concerns, I see that this petition has received more than 750 signatures and many negative comments about the Amp project. To anyone who is familiar with survey data responses, this would indicate that there are probably 4 or 5 times that number that have not responded for one reason or another or don't feel comfortable expressing their opinions. These numbers reflect the size of this problem.
H
Hale Oliver
11 years ago
It now appears that the lack of transparency initially gave the Chautauqua leadership a tremendous advantage...they were able to characterize the Amp Project as a renovation when in all probability it was known to be a complete tear down and rebuild. This has become a huge public relations nightmare. The concerns of the Chautauqua community have already made the Buffalo, Jamestown and Cleveland newspapers. I fear this bad PR will harm our image. I strongly recommend that Tom Becker and Jim Pardo call an emergency meeting of the Board of Trustees and reconsider their decisions.
M
Molly Dunning
11 years ago
After very careful consideration and the research of all available information I can only hope the Board of Trustees will hold true to their doctrine to protect the mission and integrity of the Institution, including its historical relevance and current standing as a National Landmark. Rushing to get bids in place so this can pass a Feb board meeting would be irresponsible and negligent.
T
Tim and Murphy Carpenter
11 years ago
we are passionate in this effort and want sincerely to be of help anyway we can. Stay the course!
Don't let the Amp go!
Complete replacement is unnecessary. A few alterations would improve access for those with mobility impairments.
Please do not destroy history and cherished memories. The ampitheater is a focus point for all Chautauquans. Destruction of this historical building will a a great tragedy.
Chautauqua Institution shoul uphold it reputation for intelligent high qualty cultural experiences and not try to copete with the Salmanca Casino
I would just like to feel like the administration is being completely transparent with the public. I would really like to see the old structure stay in place, however, I understand that as structures age they start to weaken structurally. Is this the case? Why. Does the current structure need to be replaced? Is it in danger of falling down?
don't undo history
Historic structures should be preserved, not remuddeled.
Preserve the Amp in its current conditions.
This was a part of my childhood! The symphony on Sunday taught me to love classical Music.
Visited Chautauqua this summer and had the wonderful experience of listening to the orchestra rehersal for the 4th of July venue. What a lost for everyone should the Amphitheater be demolisted.
I graduated here in 1972 and worked at Chautauqua in '70,'71 & '72 ~ so many great memories at teh amphitheater ~ sitting alone in silence, with a friend or being entertained. I will NEVER forget it's beauty.
you cannot replace historic significance
My first job ever was cleaning the Amp every morning. The thought of this beautiful structure being replaced is heartbreaking. Please save this landmark for another 120 years for generation to enjoy!
please leave amp alone except for necessary repairs
As a Chautauquan I am deeply saddened by this. As a professional with a Masters degree in City and Regional Planning I also question the process also and decision making behind the project.
On a very personal note...I really hate submitting my comments but feel in all good conscience I must. What a shame that this project, which could have been the accomplishment of the century, has now become a stain on who we are and what we stand for...an open, transparent community that takes pride in upholding these ideals. This is a sad time for Chautauqua.
. As I write my concerns, I see that this petition has received more than 750 signatures and many negative comments about the Amp project. To anyone who is familiar with survey data responses, this would indicate that there are probably 4 or 5 times that number that have not responded for one reason or another or don't feel comfortable expressing their opinions. These numbers reflect the size of this problem.
It now appears that the lack of transparency initially gave the Chautauqua leadership a tremendous advantage...they were able to characterize the Amp Project as a renovation when in all probability it was known to be a complete tear down and rebuild. This has become a huge public relations nightmare. The concerns of the Chautauqua community have already made the Buffalo, Jamestown and Cleveland newspapers. I fear this bad PR will harm our image. I strongly recommend that Tom Becker and Jim Pardo call an emergency meeting of the Board of Trustees and reconsider their decisions.
After very careful consideration and the research of all available information I can only hope the Board of Trustees will hold true to their doctrine to protect the mission and integrity of the Institution, including its historical relevance and current standing as a National Landmark. Rushing to get bids in place so this can pass a Feb board meeting would be irresponsible and negligent.
we are passionate in this effort and want sincerely to be of help anyway we can. Stay the course!