Skip to main content

Keep Red Rock Rural

16,560 Comments

D
David Gaines
9 years ago

The entire area from Blue Diamond NV to Red Rock Is spectacular and should be preserved in as prisitine a condition as possible. Once destroyed by development, the area would be lost forever, never to be enjoyed for its natural beauty and serenity by all citizens. And an inexcusible loss of wildlife habitat.

M
Mavis M Owens
9 years ago

Don't let development ruin this pristine area.

C
Cathleen kozmary
9 years ago

Allowing this development would really & truly harm the beautiful surroundings in such a negative way. Please go with common sense about our environment!

J
Jeff Chandler
9 years ago

Developing this place would be a travesty to what's left of beautiful near Las Vegas.

L
lorihart
9 years ago

Save Red Rock

B
Becca Seegmiller
9 years ago

Save red rock

K
Karen Kazinski
9 years ago

There are plenty of other areas to develop. Don't mar the natural beauty of this place.

A
Alicia Brown
9 years ago

We need to preserve Red Rock

D
Danny Leberger
9 years ago

There is plenty of desert, go find another place to build!!

V
Violet Quann
9 years ago

Don't destroy Vegas' natural beauty

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

ridiculous

S
Shelby Wendelsdorf
9 years ago

So many other spots to build! Keep red Rock our get away from the city.

K
Kriszt Thierry
9 years ago

Every day we talk about sa vingt the planet, so start by saving this beautifully wild place. And i know this area.

M
Matthew McCrickard
9 years ago

I really don't understand what a housing development would add to Red Rock. Once you destroy this area, you can't put it back the way it was. Why not tear down some horrible area and make it better? The entire point of Red Rock is that it's an uninhibited natural area. It's stark beauty is the slow result of time. Undoing it with digging and blasting makes no sense to me. Once this is destroyed, the developer will just want to expand ("see, it wasn't that bad") until there is nothing left of Red Rock. This decision is vital because any backing down on national parks could set a precedent for future policy decisions. You can rebuild bridges, dams, and entire cities. You can't rebuild a national park.

V
Virginia LaRose
9 years ago

Build somewhere else, not here !!! Vegas have enough developer building houses! Preserve the beauty of Red Rock!

K
Krystal Stephenson
9 years ago

Please!

S
Susan Butche
9 years ago

Very bad idea by a greedy developer to put homes on land that should be preserved as non-rural conservation.

T
tom donnelly
9 years ago

I visit Red Rock Canyon an average of once per year for the last 30 years, spending plenty of travel money. If you develop this area, it will become much less scenic and a less desirable destination.

R
Regina Harman
9 years ago

With similar much development over the years, leave the one piece of natural beauty we have left... it is bd enough we are so close to red Rock now...years ago it was much better, you are destroying an area that people from all over the world come to see. . Just go talk to the visitors and find that out.

R
Robert D Eden
9 years ago

We have enough housing...leave the rural areas as they were intended to be. More housing consumes more water....of which we are growing short. Rhodes is in it for the money...we must STOP this development; or others like him will destroy any open land they can build on.