Save Our View, No Expanded Cell Tower @ 4201 E Skyline,Tucson
38 Comments
D
Diane Enright
9 years ago
I oppose the proposed cell towers.
D
Dawn Kirschenman
9 years ago
I oppose the cell towers proposed.
M
Mark Bauer
9 years ago
6651 N Catalina Ave
I oppose these towers
M
Mark Bauer
9 years ago
6651 N Catalina Ave Tucson
I oppose these towers
G
george novalis
9 years ago
I am against the cell towers proposed
I have lived in the subdivision for 38 years-The towers would be intrusive
A
Allan K Cameron
9 years ago
Featured
This property owner is and has been in clear violation of the CC&Rs applicable to all lots within the subdivision. In the 1970's this property owner won a lawsuit lodged by the HOA because of the high profile of the home structure. The HOA lost and had to file for bankruptcy. This lot owner has prevailed in secrecy from the start and should be taken to task in a lawsuit by the HOA. Why not??
D
Douglas Goodman
9 years ago
6520 N Mesa View drive
J
JOE KELLY
9 years ago
JOE KELLY
P
Patricia Sable
9 years ago
Featured
I am very much opposed to these cell towers for the reasons stipulated in the petition. There are over 500 lots in Coronado Foothills Estates, many of which would be impacted by the towers and the associated equipment. As a realtor who lives and works in the Foothills, I believe that property values -- particularly those in the adjacent lots or those in which the towers are visible -- would be severely impacted.
J
John Corbett
9 years ago
Featured
Ugly eye sore, and possible health hazard for the community. As the resident will certainly profit, at our expense, it violates the no commercial clause intent. The foot in the door present transmission system is not justification for compounded transgression.
I oppose the proposed cell towers.
I oppose the cell towers proposed.
6651 N Catalina Ave I oppose these towers
6651 N Catalina Ave Tucson I oppose these towers
I am against the cell towers proposed I have lived in the subdivision for 38 years-The towers would be intrusive
This property owner is and has been in clear violation of the CC&Rs applicable to all lots within the subdivision. In the 1970's this property owner won a lawsuit lodged by the HOA because of the high profile of the home structure. The HOA lost and had to file for bankruptcy. This lot owner has prevailed in secrecy from the start and should be taken to task in a lawsuit by the HOA. Why not??
6520 N Mesa View drive
JOE KELLY
I am very much opposed to these cell towers for the reasons stipulated in the petition. There are over 500 lots in Coronado Foothills Estates, many of which would be impacted by the towers and the associated equipment. As a realtor who lives and works in the Foothills, I believe that property values -- particularly those in the adjacent lots or those in which the towers are visible -- would be severely impacted.
Ugly eye sore, and possible health hazard for the community. As the resident will certainly profit, at our expense, it violates the no commercial clause intent. The foot in the door present transmission system is not justification for compounded transgression.
6550 N Catalina Ave
6816 North Cocopas Road
6616 N. Donna Beatrix Cir Tucson, AZ 85718
6902 N. TABLE MOUNTAIN ROAD
Address: 4151 E. Coronado Dr.
4141 E Placita Pequena
6440 N Mesa View Drive
6521 N Columbus Blvd