Safe Country

I feel that 5G is risky for all the above reasons. I object to the rollout.

NO to 5G we have enough technology

Our gov does not abide by the Aus constitution or any acts to protect us they have no law, that gives us little say( fight on)

Until 5G is proved safe it must not go ahead especially in Bellingen my home town.

I do not consent to this attack

stop 5G in Australia

Stop 5g now in our community

I do not consent to the installation of 5g technology on the grounds of scientifically proven concerns regarding the safety and side effects of this frequency for humans and animals.

Until they can prove beyond a doubt that this is safe , it should not go ahead !

we do not want damage to our health anywhere in this country.

I object to all 5G upgrades in the Bellingen shire and call for a moratorium on the roll-out of 5G across the entire region, for the following reasons: 1. The 5G roll out is a breach of the mandatory obligation to apply the precautionary principle when deploying mobile phone radio communications infrastructure (Clause 4 Mobile Phone Base Station Deployment Code). 2. There are thousands of peer-reviewed scientific studies evidencing harm from radio frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF EMR) well below the standards set by ARPANSA. 3. The ARPANSA Standard has been strongly criticised by independent scientists worldwide as unscientific and inadequate for the protection of human safety. Authorities in other countries have adopted standards ten to 100 times more rigorous than the ARPANSA Standard. 4. More than 250 scientists have signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which calls for stronger exposure limits. These scientists have published more than 2000 peer-reviewed papers on EMF in professional journals and arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of non-ionising radiation. 5. No long-term prospective studies have been completed proving the safety of RF EMR levels under the ARPANSA Standard for children. 6. In 2011, the International Agency on Research on Cancer (IARC) listed non-ionising radio frequency radiation from cell phones and other wireless devices in Group 2B: Possibly carcinogenic to humans. 7. A number of leading scientists have since argued that the evidence that wireless is carcinogenic has increased and IARC should upgrade the listing to Group 2A: probably carcinogenic to humans or Group 1: carcinogenic to human’s classification. 8. The views of ICNIRP (on whose guidelines the ARPANSA Standard is based) and ARPANSA are not in line with the opinions of the larger, independent scientific community that has published peer-reviewed research on the biological effects of RF EMR. ICNIRP is not independent of

No to 5G, it is not proven that it’s safe and out internet speed works just fine. Thanks

simply no

I recently learnt that over 250 international scientists have signed a plea to the UN and WHO to slow down the release of this 5G technology out of concern for the health and wellbeing of humanity. I am concerned for the health and wellbeing of humanity. Until there is irrefutable proof that 5G does not cause any harm to humans or any other life forms, this cannot and will not go ahead.

This technology is not tested. We do not need it, why not wait until it is tested?

I do not consent to the 5G roll out untill it proves safe for humans. This is not yet the case and as such it is unsafe to bring into our shire.

No need.

Council need to protect me from 5G. I am 10 years old and i to not want to die any time soon so stop 5G . It has not been proven to be safe so why is Telstra going ahead with it. Zion

I object to the roll out go 5G networks throughout the country of Australia on the grounds of substandard Health standards and guaranteed protection for human safety.

We are not guinea pigs