Revoke the 2019 Reef Amendment Act and Check the Science
561 Comments
G
Glen McAdam
6 years ago
Kep up the good work.
M
Mitch White
6 years ago
For TOO long faulty or inaccurate or biased science has been used by people who want to change the world to suit their own agenda which is based on their biases.
S
Steve McMillan
6 years ago
Dr Peter Rudd is the only one telling the truth & who doesn't have his hand in the taxpayers pocket.
P
Paul Pappas
6 years ago
Featured
If the government has funded the research, then the government deserves to have this research independently verified to determine whether this Act is based on good science, and is not the output of activists wearing lab coats.
D
Derek Sheppard
6 years ago
There must be very good justification for imposing legislation and regulations on farmers. This legislation lacks both common sense and scientific reasoning. Politics is at the heart of this legislation, and a complete disregard for farmers. The legislation should be repealed and the process commenced again to determine what if any effects there are of farming on the Reef. There will be far less regulatory excessive ways to ensure there is little runoff from farms that might affect the Reef. The effects of runoffs from increasing coastal urbanisation must also be calculated and considered for effects on the Reef.
E
ELLIOT Scarffe
6 years ago
Base the law on science not popularity
J
Jon Smith
6 years ago
This is needed
C
Chris Murray
6 years ago
I support Dr Peter Ridd in his stand for the rights of the farmers. He understands the reef far better than those who introduced these damageing regulations.
C
Clare Chiarizia
6 years ago
Keep up the Great Work
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
Peter Ridd is the science expert and we should listen to him not those who are pushing a political instead of a scientific agenda.
B
Brad Ahern
6 years ago
Whatever farm runoff leaches into rivers, its journey to the ocean stops when the river meets the ocean. Only inshore reefs are affected and are specific corals which can cope with the increase in nutrient levels. the Great Barrier Reef is not affected because it is well offshore and is constantly flushed by the Pacific Ocean circulation leaving fresh ocean water constantly.
D
David Wycherley
6 years ago
Just do it now...
W
William Clarke
6 years ago
This abuse by Labor/Green and the unelected radical/activist environmental Bureaucracy must be stopped and called to account.
L
Linda Frakes
6 years ago
Political correctness must stop interfering with real people facing real problems. PC blinkers are hurting too many.
B
Bruce mcfarlane
6 years ago
I support Peter Ridd
A
Andrew barbuto
6 years ago
Make decisions on fact, not leftist fallacies.
G
Gerald Gerry Ward
6 years ago
The real science shows that we have, in fact, got very healthy coral in our waters.
P
Peter Swan
6 years ago
I strongly support academic freedom and condemn the illegal sacking of Professor
Peter Ridd.
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
Universities need to be held accountable.
R
Ree
6 years ago
People who stand up for their truth, can only given the highest respect, now let us have a government of the same calibre as Peter Ridd. A government that is Full Truth.
Kep up the good work.
For TOO long faulty or inaccurate or biased science has been used by people who want to change the world to suit their own agenda which is based on their biases.
Dr Peter Rudd is the only one telling the truth & who doesn't have his hand in the taxpayers pocket.
If the government has funded the research, then the government deserves to have this research independently verified to determine whether this Act is based on good science, and is not the output of activists wearing lab coats.
There must be very good justification for imposing legislation and regulations on farmers. This legislation lacks both common sense and scientific reasoning. Politics is at the heart of this legislation, and a complete disregard for farmers. The legislation should be repealed and the process commenced again to determine what if any effects there are of farming on the Reef. There will be far less regulatory excessive ways to ensure there is little runoff from farms that might affect the Reef. The effects of runoffs from increasing coastal urbanisation must also be calculated and considered for effects on the Reef.
Base the law on science not popularity
This is needed
I support Dr Peter Ridd in his stand for the rights of the farmers. He understands the reef far better than those who introduced these damageing regulations.
Keep up the Great Work
Peter Ridd is the science expert and we should listen to him not those who are pushing a political instead of a scientific agenda.
Whatever farm runoff leaches into rivers, its journey to the ocean stops when the river meets the ocean. Only inshore reefs are affected and are specific corals which can cope with the increase in nutrient levels. the Great Barrier Reef is not affected because it is well offshore and is constantly flushed by the Pacific Ocean circulation leaving fresh ocean water constantly.
Just do it now...
This abuse by Labor/Green and the unelected radical/activist environmental Bureaucracy must be stopped and called to account.
Political correctness must stop interfering with real people facing real problems. PC blinkers are hurting too many.
I support Peter Ridd
Make decisions on fact, not leftist fallacies.
The real science shows that we have, in fact, got very healthy coral in our waters.
I strongly support academic freedom and condemn the illegal sacking of Professor Peter Ridd.
Universities need to be held accountable.
People who stand up for their truth, can only given the highest respect, now let us have a government of the same calibre as Peter Ridd. A government that is Full Truth.