Withhold funding for Nuclear Waste Storage before it's too late!
438 Comments
L
lisa uhrhammer
8 years ago
The investors should be responsible for the waste and the cost to move the waste and pay for its storage for perpetuity.
A
ARTHUR MANOOGIAN
8 years ago
Please consider the options presented as the consequences are enormous.
L
linda fiorelli
8 years ago
Federal government, keep your promise to ship this waste to a unpopulated site, ie yucca mountain.
S
Scott Atkinson
8 years ago
Storage of this waste is not being done safely. A leak would cut off transportation at a crucial North- South artery.
V
Valerie Moodie
8 years ago
It is a huge nuclear accident waiting to happen given the dangers here
J
Junko ABe
8 years ago
I am a Japanese woman. As California and other US West Coast suffered Fukushima accident, we in Japan will also suffer damage on our side of the Pacific in the possible event of Nclear Waste Storage Facility at San Onofre.
S
Shahrokh Mirjahangir
8 years ago
Do the right thing. No Permit without safety for our beloved Gold Coast and its residence
E
Elaine Echenique
8 years ago
Secure safety for San Clemente! Nuclear waste should not be stored near our community!
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Featured
Calif. is ground zero for quakes...it's insane that nuclear power plants were even built here...let alone after decommissioning SONGS that Edison is being allowed to "store" the nuclear waste in thin-walled containers INCAPABLE OF SUSTAINING CONTAINMENT due to cracking, etc.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Please carefully review all the facts and I think you will come to the same conclusion: the thin canisters approved for San Onofre are inadequate and extremely dangerous.
S
Sally Barron
8 years ago
Temporary storage containers at the edge of the ocean are a disaster waiting to happen,
D
Diana Eagan
8 years ago
Bad-in every conceivable way.
Protect the people..protect the oceans. Put safety first.
P
PJ Douglas
8 years ago
NO, NO, NO to burying nuclear waste at San Onofre Beach. One good storm and it will be all over.
D
Donna Fleming
8 years ago
Nuclear waste does not belong near the coast. The Coastal Commission needs to do the right thing and move those canisters to a nuclear waste facility. Our country has these facilities and that is where the waste belongs. Not 1000 yards from the beach.
K
Kimberly Lefner
8 years ago
Please revoke SCE's permit to bury nuclear waste within feet of the ocean.
C
Candice letter
8 years ago
Do damn dangerous! Don't store it by the sea wall!!!
C
chris Lamont
8 years ago
Please take this somewhere else that is more appropriate and safe !!! Keep this away from our beautiful beaches and residentail ares where people can be harmed.
P
Pam Patterson
8 years ago
Edison has had more than 54 years to responsibly resolve the issue of where and how to store this nuclear waste. Just one more example of the mismanagement and incredibly cavalier attitude SCE, the CPUC, and the NRC have with respect to our welfare. The Coastal Commission needs to do the right thing here, and revoke the permit; and this nuclear waste needs to be properly stored, i.e., in the 10" canisters!
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Please resolve this potentially dangerous situation..
C
Cindy Berg
8 years ago
UNBELIEVABLE!!!! MOVE THE CANISTER'S TO THE DESERT NOW!!!
The investors should be responsible for the waste and the cost to move the waste and pay for its storage for perpetuity.
Please consider the options presented as the consequences are enormous.
Federal government, keep your promise to ship this waste to a unpopulated site, ie yucca mountain.
Storage of this waste is not being done safely. A leak would cut off transportation at a crucial North- South artery.
It is a huge nuclear accident waiting to happen given the dangers here
I am a Japanese woman. As California and other US West Coast suffered Fukushima accident, we in Japan will also suffer damage on our side of the Pacific in the possible event of Nclear Waste Storage Facility at San Onofre.
Do the right thing. No Permit without safety for our beloved Gold Coast and its residence
Secure safety for San Clemente! Nuclear waste should not be stored near our community!
Calif. is ground zero for quakes...it's insane that nuclear power plants were even built here...let alone after decommissioning SONGS that Edison is being allowed to "store" the nuclear waste in thin-walled containers INCAPABLE OF SUSTAINING CONTAINMENT due to cracking, etc.
Please carefully review all the facts and I think you will come to the same conclusion: the thin canisters approved for San Onofre are inadequate and extremely dangerous.
Temporary storage containers at the edge of the ocean are a disaster waiting to happen,
Bad-in every conceivable way. Protect the people..protect the oceans. Put safety first.
NO, NO, NO to burying nuclear waste at San Onofre Beach. One good storm and it will be all over.
Nuclear waste does not belong near the coast. The Coastal Commission needs to do the right thing and move those canisters to a nuclear waste facility. Our country has these facilities and that is where the waste belongs. Not 1000 yards from the beach.
Please revoke SCE's permit to bury nuclear waste within feet of the ocean.
Do damn dangerous! Don't store it by the sea wall!!!
Please take this somewhere else that is more appropriate and safe !!! Keep this away from our beautiful beaches and residentail ares where people can be harmed.
Edison has had more than 54 years to responsibly resolve the issue of where and how to store this nuclear waste. Just one more example of the mismanagement and incredibly cavalier attitude SCE, the CPUC, and the NRC have with respect to our welfare. The Coastal Commission needs to do the right thing here, and revoke the permit; and this nuclear waste needs to be properly stored, i.e., in the 10" canisters!
Please resolve this potentially dangerous situation..
UNBELIEVABLE!!!! MOVE THE CANISTER'S TO THE DESERT NOW!!!