Withhold funding for Nuclear Waste Storage before it's too late!
438 Comments
O
Omid Kanani
8 years ago
I moved from KY to beautiful San Clemente and the last thing I ever imagined is that I will be living around 10 miles from Nuclear waste stored on my beach. Shame, Shame, Shame....
N
Nancy Staek
8 years ago
permit they approved for Edison was flawed and must be revoked. The Special Conditions in the Coastal Permit that are twenty years out are well intended, but should have been required from the start. Other countries currently use nuclear waste storage systems that could meet those reasonable requirements today. Their containers can be inspected, repaired, maintained, monitored and transported without cracks. The thin canisters being used at San Onofre have none of these attributes because they were only intended for temporary storage.!!
E
Ed Oberweiser
8 years ago
PG&E has a very bad record as regards nuclear safety. They should never have built San Onofre in the first place. It sits over a right face vertical fault and it failed. That's why it has been shut downl.
P
Patricia Brumfield
8 years ago
The citizens of Southern CA are outraged and terrified at what So Ca Edison is trying to do! This permit must be stopped until an independent study is done.
F
Fred Jakobcic
8 years ago
Waste is radioactive, waste water, dangerous and inefficient and expensive and dirty-read NUCLEAR ROULETTE
P
Peter Lee
8 years ago
Too Dangerous!
L
Linda C Jones
8 years ago
The permit you approved for Edison was flawed and must be revoked. The Special Conditions in the Coastal Permit that are twenty years out are well intended, but should have been required from the start. Other countries currently use nuclear waste storage systems that could meet those reasonable requirements today. Their containers can be inspected, repaired, maintained, monitored and transported without cracks. The thin canisters being used at San Onofre have none of these attributes because they were only intended for temporary storage.
D
Don McKelvey
8 years ago
This is a no-brainer !
K
karen L black
8 years ago
Let common sense and not greed be your guide.
D
Don McKelvey
8 years ago
This is a no-brainer !
J
John Krauss
8 years ago
stop this madness. clean the area & leave no trace
D
Dorelle Rawlings
8 years ago
Fix this problem. Allowing Edison to bury nuclear waste next to the ocean in thin-walled casks is just crazy!
L
Linda hogan-estrada
8 years ago
I vote not to silently kill good AMERICANS
V
Vina Colley
8 years ago
I am a whistleblower from the Portsmouth/Piketon , Ohio Gaseous Diffusion plant. We have a very serious problem at many site with the waste. My co-workers our dying or like me fighting health issues. Nuclear waste is very serious hazardous waste and a environmental problem now facing us all. It's our responsibility to future generations to solve this problem in a safe place.
T
Terry Albrecht
8 years ago
Please don't bury it here, so close to the surface and so close to millions of people.
C
Cathy Deppe
8 years ago
Please support this call
S
Susan Willhoit
8 years ago
Think beyond the cheaper cost....think of your children and grandchildren.
I moved from KY to beautiful San Clemente and the last thing I ever imagined is that I will be living around 10 miles from Nuclear waste stored on my beach. Shame, Shame, Shame....
permit they approved for Edison was flawed and must be revoked. The Special Conditions in the Coastal Permit that are twenty years out are well intended, but should have been required from the start. Other countries currently use nuclear waste storage systems that could meet those reasonable requirements today. Their containers can be inspected, repaired, maintained, monitored and transported without cracks. The thin canisters being used at San Onofre have none of these attributes because they were only intended for temporary storage.!!
PG&E has a very bad record as regards nuclear safety. They should never have built San Onofre in the first place. It sits over a right face vertical fault and it failed. That's why it has been shut downl.
The citizens of Southern CA are outraged and terrified at what So Ca Edison is trying to do! This permit must be stopped until an independent study is done.
Waste is radioactive, waste water, dangerous and inefficient and expensive and dirty-read NUCLEAR ROULETTE
Too Dangerous!
The permit you approved for Edison was flawed and must be revoked. The Special Conditions in the Coastal Permit that are twenty years out are well intended, but should have been required from the start. Other countries currently use nuclear waste storage systems that could meet those reasonable requirements today. Their containers can be inspected, repaired, maintained, monitored and transported without cracks. The thin canisters being used at San Onofre have none of these attributes because they were only intended for temporary storage.
This is a no-brainer !
Let common sense and not greed be your guide.
This is a no-brainer !
stop this madness. clean the area & leave no trace
Fix this problem. Allowing Edison to bury nuclear waste next to the ocean in thin-walled casks is just crazy!
I vote not to silently kill good AMERICANS
I am a whistleblower from the Portsmouth/Piketon , Ohio Gaseous Diffusion plant. We have a very serious problem at many site with the waste. My co-workers our dying or like me fighting health issues. Nuclear waste is very serious hazardous waste and a environmental problem now facing us all. It's our responsibility to future generations to solve this problem in a safe place.
Please don't bury it here, so close to the surface and so close to millions of people.
Please support this call
Think beyond the cheaper cost....think of your children and grandchildren.
Revoke this permit before there is a disaster!
Please do what you know is right for mankind.
Not There, Not ever