We can’t see any reasonable reasons for deducting 30 mins school times solely because of the cancellation of the tea time. It is a hard year for all the kids and the schools and we all treasure the resumption of the classes. No tea time is fine and that can be replaced by other kids activities like drawing, reading or story telling. For K3 kids, the delay of going back to school even affect their coming P1 routine as primary schools start the classes even earlier. We do hope the managers of the school would reconsider and review such decision and let’s the kid could complete their academic year, which will be only 3 more months to go.
M
Michelle
5 years ago
Very disappointed about the shorten class time to 2.5hrs..The school did not thought about the parent’s perspective. It been virtual lesson for more than 3 months and we are all looking forward on real lesson but now just announced in 2 days on the decision of shorten the lesson time.
W
Wong Hong Yui
5 years ago
This is unreasonable to shorten the school hours by the way of cancelling the snack time.
It caused a lot of unnecessary inconvenient to parents!
L
Linda Tang
5 years ago
Can the school show some sympathy on we working parents? Reducing 20 mins tea-time shall amount to cutting 30 mins learning time?
E
Elaine Tsui
5 years ago
Pls remain the 3-hr school time without shortening it.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Disagree to shorten the time.
W
Wong
5 years ago
Pls don’t shorten the sch hour
J
Jolly Chu
5 years ago
Hope the school can remain the gate opening time for a.m. session at 8:25 as it affects a lot of working parents.
S
Sarah
5 years ago
Agree!
W
Winnie Wong
5 years ago
Request keeping 3 hours class time. Thanks.
G
Garie Leung
5 years ago
小朋友返幼稚園食茶點都係學習的一部份
生日會不準吃東西 請問還有意義嗎？
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
The decision of the school to start class at a later time, provided with a two-day notice and without consultation with parents, is unreasonable and inconsiderate, especially to working parents. The usual drop off time starts at 820, allowing a working parent with sufficient time to transport to the office before working hours (e.g. 9AM). This sudden, unprompted change has failed to consider this important factor. Additionally, scientific reports have shown that masks are inefficient in stopping URTI amongst kids with runny nose. The school's decision is nothing by an overkill. Not allowing hungry kids to snacks is not different from starving a kid, which is inhuman, as this is a just another form of torture.
Face to face lessons are very important to the kids and not many school days left for this year. Please re-consider the arrangement and revert back to original school hours.
L
Leanna LAM
5 years ago
要以學生為本。取消茶點時間是可以，不用縮短課堂時間。
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Keep the original school hour for the benefits of working parents and kids
V
Vincy Lee
5 years ago
明白學校顧及學生健康, 但學校沒有理解家長困難.
M
Megan Fuk
5 years ago
Its totally unacceptable for the school to change the school hour
S
Serena
5 years ago
Please be more thoughtful and considerate of working parents.
We can’t see any reasonable reasons for deducting 30 mins school times solely because of the cancellation of the tea time. It is a hard year for all the kids and the schools and we all treasure the resumption of the classes. No tea time is fine and that can be replaced by other kids activities like drawing, reading or story telling. For K3 kids, the delay of going back to school even affect their coming P1 routine as primary schools start the classes even earlier. We do hope the managers of the school would reconsider and review such decision and let’s the kid could complete their academic year, which will be only 3 more months to go.
Very disappointed about the shorten class time to 2.5hrs..The school did not thought about the parent’s perspective. It been virtual lesson for more than 3 months and we are all looking forward on real lesson but now just announced in 2 days on the decision of shorten the lesson time.
This is unreasonable to shorten the school hours by the way of cancelling the snack time. It caused a lot of unnecessary inconvenient to parents!
Can the school show some sympathy on we working parents? Reducing 20 mins tea-time shall amount to cutting 30 mins learning time?
Pls remain the 3-hr school time without shortening it.
Disagree to shorten the time.
Pls don’t shorten the sch hour
Hope the school can remain the gate opening time for a.m. session at 8:25 as it affects a lot of working parents.
Agree!
Request keeping 3 hours class time. Thanks.
小朋友返幼稚園食茶點都係學習的一部份 生日會不準吃東西 請問還有意義嗎？
The decision of the school to start class at a later time, provided with a two-day notice and without consultation with parents, is unreasonable and inconsiderate, especially to working parents. The usual drop off time starts at 820, allowing a working parent with sufficient time to transport to the office before working hours (e.g. 9AM). This sudden, unprompted change has failed to consider this important factor. Additionally, scientific reports have shown that masks are inefficient in stopping URTI amongst kids with runny nose. The school's decision is nothing by an overkill. Not allowing hungry kids to snacks is not different from starving a kid, which is inhuman, as this is a just another form of torture.
Totally agreed.
之前已損失了大半年以上面授時間 未來亦未知會否再停課 難得現在有機會面授 為何要因為cut茶點的原因剝奪學生的半小時學習和群體生活時間 而且 事前全沒有諮詢 突然宣布兩天後即刻執行此安排會否有點倉猝 把家長殺個措手不及 處理方式令人十分失望
Face to face lessons are very important to the kids and not many school days left for this year. Please re-consider the arrangement and revert back to original school hours.
要以學生為本。取消茶點時間是可以，不用縮短課堂時間。
Keep the original school hour for the benefits of working parents and kids
明白學校顧及學生健康, 但學校沒有理解家長困難.
Its totally unacceptable for the school to change the school hour
Please be more thoughtful and considerate of working parents.