Skip to main content

Restore the world's ocean pH measurements

442 Comments

J
Jeremy Poynton
11 years ago

A big hand to Mike Wallace!

J
Jeremy Poynton
11 years ago

A big hand to Mike Wallace!

G
Graeme Hart
11 years ago

Resources that could be applied to genuine problems have been stolen - "acquired" by deception.

G
Graeme Hart
11 years ago

Resources that could be applied to genuine problems have been stolen - "acquired" by deception.

G
Greg Scott
11 years ago

Restore the reputation of science and not let it be tarnished by activists masquerading as climate scientists.

G
Greg Scott
11 years ago

Restore the reputation of science and not let it be tarnished by activists masquerading as climate scientists.

S
Shaun Barrett
11 years ago

Give us the raw data; not contrived computer models!

S
Shaun Barrett
11 years ago

Give us the raw data; not contrived computer models!

M
Mike Walker
11 years ago

Time to let honesty in the 'settled' science appear, and show the public what's going on with the data they trust.

M
Mike Walker
11 years ago

Time to let honesty in the 'settled' science appear, and show the public what's going on with the data they trust.

P
Peter Meadows
11 years ago

Scientific fraud of this type must be publicly exposed and the perpetrators admonished

P
Peter Meadows
11 years ago

Scientific fraud of this type must be publicly exposed and the perpetrators admonished

D
DrJohnGalan
11 years ago

If the science around human-caused global warming is unquestionable, why is the data manipulated?

D
DrJohnGalan
11 years ago

If the science around human-caused global warming is unquestionable, why is the data manipulated?

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

this is misleading an deceptive conduct, why can't they be charged?

B
bevin barnes
11 years ago

this is misleading an deceptive conduct, why can't they be charged?

D
David J Barnes
11 years ago

This is not the omission of an odd, inconvenient data point (which should not be done); it's the omission of most of the data because it doesn't fit the story the authors want to tell.

D
David J Barnes
11 years ago

This is not the omission of an odd, inconvenient data point (which should not be done); it's the omission of most of the data because it doesn't fit the story the authors want to tell.

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

Hiding data on this subject is fraud. When will we call in the authorities.

M
Mark Shay
11 years ago

Hiding data on this subject is fraud. When will we call in the authorities.