In general, I would like to see much less secondary research based on climate models that can't accurately be tied to future climate, and are therefore unverifyable.
P
Paul Thomas
11 years ago
The truth will out
P
Paul Thomas
11 years ago
The truth will out
J
James B Peters
11 years ago
The pseudo science of climate change continue.
J
James B Peters
11 years ago
The pseudo science of climate change continue.
T
Thomas Weichel
11 years ago
The phraud continues.
T
Thomas Weichel
11 years ago
The phraud continues.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
How you decide our contry's laws is my/our business, too.
P
Peter Cantwell
11 years ago
How you decide our contry's laws is my/our business, too.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
I call this throwing my hard earned tax dollars at bad science. Who benefited from these tax dollars?
C
Charles Wagner
11 years ago
I call this throwing my hard earned tax dollars at bad science. Who benefited from these tax dollars?
I
Istvan E Marko
11 years ago
As always, this is a great shame for all those who are trying to do good and honest science. Unfortunately, this kind of attitude plagues climate science.
I
Istvan E Marko
11 years ago
As always, this is a great shame for all those who are trying to do good and honest science. Unfortunately, this kind of attitude plagues climate science.
B
Bruce Robbins
11 years ago
Enough of this garbage! If these "scientists" won't do the right thing then let's force to do so.
B
Bruce Robbins
11 years ago
Enough of this garbage! If these "scientists" won't do the right thing then let's force to do so.
M
Michael Orme
11 years ago
The issue is the deliberate witholding of data which might falsify models of ph increase. This is entirely unaccetable in any circumstances and in any organisation. But for science it is a deadly blow
M
Michael Orme
11 years ago
The issue is the deliberate witholding of data which might falsify models of ph increase. This is entirely unaccetable in any circumstances and in any organisation. But for science it is a deadly blow
In general, I would like to see much less secondary research based on climate models that can't accurately be tied to future climate, and are therefore unverifyable.
The truth will out
The truth will out
The pseudo science of climate change continue.
The pseudo science of climate change continue.
The phraud continues.
The phraud continues.
How you decide our contry's laws is my/our business, too.
How you decide our contry's laws is my/our business, too.
I call this throwing my hard earned tax dollars at bad science. Who benefited from these tax dollars?
I call this throwing my hard earned tax dollars at bad science. Who benefited from these tax dollars?
As always, this is a great shame for all those who are trying to do good and honest science. Unfortunately, this kind of attitude plagues climate science.
As always, this is a great shame for all those who are trying to do good and honest science. Unfortunately, this kind of attitude plagues climate science.
Enough of this garbage! If these "scientists" won't do the right thing then let's force to do so.
Enough of this garbage! If these "scientists" won't do the right thing then let's force to do so.
The issue is the deliberate witholding of data which might falsify models of ph increase. This is entirely unaccetable in any circumstances and in any organisation. But for science it is a deadly blow
The issue is the deliberate witholding of data which might falsify models of ph increase. This is entirely unaccetable in any circumstances and in any organisation. But for science it is a deadly blow
pH fraud is politics - not science!
pH fraud is politics - not science!
Frauds must not prosper