Residents of 1850 and 1840 Bloor Street - Capital Repairs and Rent Increase

No offence wrote: “I went several times in court to defend myself against traffic tickets, believing I am a ‘smart a..s’. I lost most of the time....” Well if you need legal aid to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should pause your ability to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. Though if you decide to practice this line further, you should deploy some arguments to give ground of your overarching and bizarre statements to say the list.

No offence wrote: “I went several times in court to defend myself against traffic tickets, believing I am a ‘smart ass’. I lost most of the time....” Well if you need legal aid to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should pause your ability to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. Though if you decide to practice this line further, you should deploy some arguments to give ground of your overarching and bizarre statements to say the list.

No offence wrote: “I went several times in court to defend myself against traffic tickets, believing I am a ‘smart ass’. I lost most of the time....” Well if you need legal aid to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should pause your ability to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. Though if you decide to practice this line, you should deploy 1, 2, 3 arguments to give ground to your overarching and ill bizarre statements to say the list.

No offence wrote: “I went several times in court to defend myself against traffic tickets, believing I am a ‘smart ass’. I lost most of the time....” Well if you need legal aid to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should pause your ability to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. If you practice this line, you should deploy 1, 2, 3 arguments to give ground to your overarching and ill bizarre statements to say the list.

No offence wrote: “I went several times in court to defend myself against traffic tickets, believing I am a ‘smart ass’. I lost most of the time....” Well, if you need an attorney to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should pause your ability to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. If you practice this line, you should deploy 1, 2, 3 arguments to give ground to your overarching and ill bizarre statements to say the list.

really wrote: “With such mentality, no wonder we lost in court...” Wait a minute: who said we lost in court? You? What is the base for your statement? What would be the pitfalls with the assertion that in exchange of 1.6 million, the Landlord should at least to share the ownership with the Tenants? And what is the logic connection between this and what happened in Court? Do you need a helper to sharp your logic and to assist you in doing your homework properly?

“I went several times in court to defend myself against traffic tickets, believing I am a ‘smart ass’. I lost most of the time....” Well, if you need an attorney to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should pause your ability to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. If you practice this line, you should deploy 1, 2, 3 arguments to give ground to your overarching and ill bizarre statements to say the list.

“I went several times in court to defend myself against traffic tickets, believing I am a ‘smart ass’. I lost most of the time....” Well, if you need an attorney to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should question your ability to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. If you practice this line, you should deploy 1, 2, 3 arguments to give ground to your overarching and ill bizarre statements to say the list.

“I went several times in court to defend myself against traffic tickets, believing I am a ‘smart ass’. I lost most of the time....” Well, if you need a attorney to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should challenge your ability to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. If you practice this line, you should deploy 1, 2, 3 arguments to give ground to your overarching and ill bizarre statements to say the list.

“I went several times in court to defend myself against traffic tickets, believing I am a ‘smart ass’. I lost most of the time....” Well, if you need a lawyer to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should challenge your ability to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. If you practice this line, you should deploy 1, 2, 3 arguments to give ground to your overarching and ill bizarre statements to say the list.

“I went several times in court to defend myself against traffic tickets, believing I am a ‘smart ass’. I lost most of the time....” Well, if you need a lawyer to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should challenge your ability to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. If you practice this line, you should deploy x, y, z arguments to give ground to your overarching and ill bizarre statements to say the list.

“I went several times in court to defend myself against traffic tickets, believing I am a ‘smart ass’. I lost most of the time....” Well, if you need a lawyer to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should challenge your ability to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. If you practice this line, you should deploy x, y, z arguments to give ground to your overarching and ill constructed statements.

“I went several times in court to defend myself against traffic tickets, believing I am a ‘smart ass’. I lost most of the time....” Well, if you need a lawyer to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should challenge your anility to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. If you practice this line, you should deploy x, y, z arguments to give ground to your overarching and insolent statements.

“I went several times in court to defend myself against traffic tickets, believing I am a ‘smart ass’. I lost most of the time....” Well, if you need a lawyer to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should challenge your anility to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. If you practice this line, you should deploy x, y, z arguments to give ground to your overarching and insolent statements. Now: - if the balconies were 40 old, how this would qualify by default a capital expenditure? Under subsection 126(8) of the RTA, a capital expenditure to replace a system or thing is not an eligible capital expenditure IF the system or thing that was replaced did not require major repair or replacement. - Where is the evidence of rust and bad shape of the old balconies? Any engineer report? Any picture or other form of documenting? Where is the evidence of safety concern about them? The Landlord presented NONE of these at the Hearing, only the biased testimony of a contractor for his client who can testify anything when he charges 1.6 mil. And a picture of work in progress, irrelevant however showing that the slabs actually were in good shape. - the Landlord dropped 6 items. So what? Out of generosity? No away, there were just fault targets to force the engulfing of the big fish (balconies) and cards in the negotiation game play. That became self evident when Tenants debunked their math and inquired every stone. - Landlord spent 1.6 mil. So what? For the care of Tenants and their balconies? In business, the thumb rule of investment is profit. “Business is not charity” is their core mantra. However, they must obey laws, rules, acts and regulations if they want to shut up even the “picky” Tenant. This is not public subscription. What if they would spend 7 million? Would they stretch that over 290 Tenants or less? Where is the equity here and why the Tenants should comply that without

(1) To: N.O. Well, if you need a lawyer to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should challenge your ability to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. If you practice this line, you should deploy abc arguments to give ground to your overarching and insolent statements.

(1) To: N.O. Well, if you need a lawyer to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should challenge your anility to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. If you practice this line, you should deploy x, y, z arguments to give ground to your overarching and insolent statements.

(1) To N.O. Well, if you need a lawyer to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should challenge your anility to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. If you continue to do so, you should deploy x, y, z arguments to give ground to your overarching and insolent statements.

(1) To: N.O. Well, if you need a lawyer to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should challenge your anility to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. If you continue to do so, you should deploy x, y, z arguments to give ground to your overarching and insolent statements.

To: N.O. Well, if you need a lawyer to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should challenge your anility to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. If you continue to do so, you should deploy x, y, z arguments to give ground to your overarching and insolent statements. Now: - if the balconies were 40 old, how this would qualify by default a capital expenditure? Under subsection 126(8) of the RTA, a capital expenditure to replace a system or thing is not an eligible capital expenditure IF the system or thing that was replaced did not require major repair or replacement. - Where is the evidence of rust and bad shape of the old balconies? Any engineer report? Any picture or other form of documenting? Where is the evidence of safety concern about them? The Landlord presented NONE of these at the Hearing, only the biased testimony of a contractor for his client who can testify anything when he charges 1.6 mil. And a picture of work in progress, irrelevant however showing that the slabs actually were in good shape. - the Landlord dropped 6 items. So what? Out of generosity? No away, there were just fault targets to force the engulfing of the big fish (balconies) and cards in the negotiation game play. That became self evident when Tenants debunked their math and inquired every stone. - Landlord spent 1.6 mil. So what? For the care of Tenants and their balconies? In business, the thumb rule of investment is profit. “Business is not charity” is their core mantra. However, they must obey laws, rules, acts and regulations if they want to shut up even the “picky” Tenant. This is not public subscription. What if they would spend 7 million? Would they stretch that over 290 Tenants or less? Where is the equity here and why the Tenants should comply that without sharing the pie? Why the AGI and the order make injustices? - Because the AGI is based on fraudulent data and the order mis

(1) To: N.O. Well, if you need a lawyer to defend your traffic ticket then you are right about the description of yourself on the matter. Then you should postpone your competency to judge or to label the Tenant’s defense against the AGI. If you continue to do so, you should deploy x, y, z arguments to give ground to your overarching and insolent statements.