Rerun a valid door entry consultation poll at Holcroft Court
23 Comments
N
Nadia K
3 years ago
I do not want the new entry system the current one is fine
P
Paul Bishton
3 years ago
Flat 7
A
Antony Miller
3 years ago
Agree with the procedural errors
Extremely opposed to spoiling the common parts with conduit.
M
Mohammed miah
3 years ago
I live in 221 holcroft court, and agree that the poll should be re-run because it was flawed and the comments made by Roger Allen are valid.
A
Annie
3 years ago
Flat 33
D
Daniele De Cinti
3 years ago
Very good
H
Hayley Beirne
3 years ago
Flat 74
M
Marco Minoli
3 years ago
Featured
I completely agree. The wired option is by far the most expensive, invasive and it's already old when installed. Mobile is much cheaper, flexible, modern.
O
O sharpe
3 years ago
Rerun is required
M
Marilyn Henry
3 years ago
Flat 219
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
Flat 47
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
Flat 32
T
Tony Chicharro
3 years ago
Tony Chicharro - Flat 144
T
Tony Chicharro
3 years ago
Featured
The WCC decision to go for a fully rewired entry system was based on a consultation with incomplete financial costs and factual information. The chosen system will require visible wiring, as asbestos has not been fully removed from areas where the current system wiring is located. WCC track record on major works has resulted in significantly higher costs at completion than at the Section 20 stage. The costs have been used to misinform residents in the recent consultation.
N
Noel Connaughton
3 years ago
Flat 86
N
Noel Connaughton
3 years ago
Featured
This is a ridiculous decision to spend £175,000+ on a system when there are cheaper and more efficient options available. I have been waiting for over 3 years for WCC to install GNetwork or Hyperoptic fast broadband to the building and I am repeatedly told that the building needs to be re-wired and with the presence of asbestos this is proving difficult. How to you propose to wire up the building for video entry if this issue is there? In addition I suspect that internal decorations will be needed after all this and we are probably talking years of disruption.
J
Janette Robertson - Flat 166
3 years ago
I am strongly against the most expensive option, feel like we do not need to spend so much money Ona new system, a simple door entry system would suffice
H
Hasit
3 years ago
Flat 172
S
Stephen Greenslade
3 years ago
flat 181
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
It seems the majority of residents neglected to vote in the previous poll
Now that the cost of the previously chosen option has concentrated minds, perhaps a rerun is appropriate, with the aim of gathering a larger number of preferences
Now that the
I do not want the new entry system the current one is fine
Flat 7
Agree with the procedural errors Extremely opposed to spoiling the common parts with conduit.
I live in 221 holcroft court, and agree that the poll should be re-run because it was flawed and the comments made by Roger Allen are valid.
Flat 33
Very good
Flat 74
I completely agree. The wired option is by far the most expensive, invasive and it's already old when installed. Mobile is much cheaper, flexible, modern.
Rerun is required
Flat 219
Flat 47
Flat 32
Tony Chicharro - Flat 144
The WCC decision to go for a fully rewired entry system was based on a consultation with incomplete financial costs and factual information. The chosen system will require visible wiring, as asbestos has not been fully removed from areas where the current system wiring is located. WCC track record on major works has resulted in significantly higher costs at completion than at the Section 20 stage. The costs have been used to misinform residents in the recent consultation.
Flat 86
This is a ridiculous decision to spend £175,000+ on a system when there are cheaper and more efficient options available. I have been waiting for over 3 years for WCC to install GNetwork or Hyperoptic fast broadband to the building and I am repeatedly told that the building needs to be re-wired and with the presence of asbestos this is proving difficult. How to you propose to wire up the building for video entry if this issue is there? In addition I suspect that internal decorations will be needed after all this and we are probably talking years of disruption.
I am strongly against the most expensive option, feel like we do not need to spend so much money Ona new system, a simple door entry system would suffice
Flat 172
flat 181
It seems the majority of residents neglected to vote in the previous poll Now that the cost of the previously chosen option has concentrated minds, perhaps a rerun is appropriate, with the aim of gathering a larger number of preferences Now that the