Skip to main content
Request to the UKC to protect the Alaskan Klee Kai Breed by removing Eliminating Faults and restoring them as "DQ's"

Request to the UKC to protect the Alaskan Klee Kai Breed by removing Eliminating Faults and restoring them as "DQ's"

235 signatures 15 to reach 250
S
Someone signed
A
Ann J. signed
L
Lanie C. signed
V
Victoria Q. signed
S
Someone signed
D
Daniel i. signed
S
Someone signed
L
Laura G. signed
S
Samantha Z. signed
K
Kendra N. signed
AW
Started by April White 10 years, 11 months ago

Many exhibitors, myself included, have produced many CH and GRCH dogs over the years. We have shown in the UKC extensively as a means to strengthen our pedigrees, prove breeding stock, and preserve the breed we have dedicated our lives to. We have trusted the UKC to preserve our breed via the breed standard. The very purpose of the standard is to preserve the breed. A few years ago the UKC created "eliminating faults" allowing some DQ's to now remain in the gene pool. There are now breeders out there breeding greatly over sized Klee Kai, solid white Klee Kai (without the mask which is a defining characteristic of our breed), and even Klee Kai with asymmetrical markings. It has literally taken decades to weed those traits out of our breed and try to keep them to standard. These items used to be a DQ in our breed just a few years ago. Now breeders are breeding dogs with these traits because the UKC says it is ok to. The UKC also states that they can not be shown. Many of us established breeders are devastated by this turn of events. Some breeders are now going out looking for AKC recognition so that the breed club and not the registry can control the standard. The breeders are saying the UKC does not care about the breed standard and preserving the breed. They are saying the UKC wants to make profit at all cost. I do not want to accept that. Dog shows are to prove breeding stock, and if a dog can not be shown inherently it should not be bred. Allowing Eliminating Faults into our standard and letting these formally DQ'd dogs in the gene pool is not an action of preserving our breed, it is an action destroying it. If is ok to breed dogs that can't be shown, what is the value in showing? The UKC has devalued their very asset by these poor decisions. Let's petition them to bring back the DQ's, remove this mockery of Eliminating Faults, and get some breeder respect back, before our breed is totally destroyed.

Updates

September 9, 2015

I have finalized the formal proposal to revert these changes and it is currently being reviewed by breed representatives. We are preparing to submit this document directly to the UKC board to demand a clear explanation for the current policy on eliminating faults.

September 9, 2015

The engagement levels have hit a point where the UKC leadership team can no longer overlook these concerns. I am drafting a formal letter to the registry board to outline our specific grievances regarding the current classification of faults. A meeting request will follow once the correspondence is delivered.

Reached 100 supporters

September 9, 2015

50 Comments

A
Alicia Bieder
10 years ago Featured

How can our community hold breeders to a higher standard when the written "authority" does not? It is sad to me that UKC seems to be out of sync with what is best for the breed.

E
Ellen Mass
10 years ago Featured

the breeders of this amazing breed have worked decades to weed out health and other issues. we must not allow UKC to continue allowing disqualifying traits to be bred!

T
Tara Finley
10 years ago Featured

Please do not destroy what has taken years to perfect! I love AKK and the standard is there for a reason. Breeding dogs purposely that cannot be shown just puts more faults in the gene pool and all the hard work that Linda Spurlin and other ethical breeders are putting in shouldn't be taken lightly. Do the right thing UKC and reinstate the DQ's!

M
Mary A Jones
10 years ago Featured

Please keep the Alaskan Klee Kai pure according to the intent of the Developer, Linda Spurlin, and the original Breeders in CO, Eileen and Clarence Gregory.

Z
Zena Campbell
10 years ago Featured

Being a companion breed, the Alaskan Klee Kai's appearance is equally important as their health, conformation and temperament. Compromising any one of these aspects will destroy any results from the dedication of conscientious breeders who aim to preserve and improve this breed.

B
Barry McFarland
10 years ago Featured

The breed is in jeopardy from money breeders and dog farmers producing anything at all that they can call Alaskan Klee Kai. Help preserve the intent of the developer and keep the standard as intended

L
Laura Gilchrist
10 years ago

Laura Gilchrist

K
Kendra Neilsen Myles
10 years ago

I fully support this initiative.

Help this petition grow

Share it with friends to help reach 250 signatures.

Your share link

Share directly