I know this is an anti-cheat system, but it's invading privacy of each individuals. It is taking away the freedom
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Too invasive
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I do not agree with proctorio.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Fuck Proctorio
M
Marc Watum
10 years ago
This has proven inconvenient in so many cases. I'm sure we can disconnect the software when we aren't under exam conditions so I won't complain about the gross privacy violations at risk here, but rather I have comments on practicality.
How do you adopt a system that you haven't even configured to suit all of the courses you provide? For example, quantitative skills. A large part of it is coordinate-based algebra that involves graphing.. Evrybody's gotta do it... yet... We can't even figure out how this is going to be examined on the program that won't allow us to draw on a grid. Are we going to create unfamiliar testing conditions to combine written work AND an online form because of this? Sounds like something students should get to know before they're halfway through the term-- and more importantly, something a professor should know before he designs his course.
Maybe many teachers show support for this in staff meetings, but as students we have heard many complain about the change and it's far from encouraging.
J
John Faye
10 years ago
I would prefer to do the test on paper, i might do something regrettable, which will result in me immediately failing.
K
Karim El Ashmawy
10 years ago
I would like to have more privacy.
G
Gustavo Adade
10 years ago
F- proctorial.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Featured
I disagree with having to look at my screen for so much time because looking at the roof or the window will be considered cheating. Also, limitations in the permissions that proctorio has should be implemented for me to be able to agree with it's use
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I prefer having exams on paper. Looking at a screen for two hours can be exhausting.
J
Josué Akobeto
10 years ago
Featured
I disagree with the idea that Hult makes me install a plugin (Proctorio) that will be reading, changing data in my computer.
G
Giovanni Beltrame
10 years ago
Featured
Although Hult intend to use solely the chrome plug-in version i am concerned about my privacy. i'd rather do an exam with somebody constantly stare at me then compromise my own privacy (even temporarily).
I know this is an anti-cheat system, but it's invading privacy of each individuals. It is taking away the freedom
Too invasive
I do not agree with proctorio.
Fuck Proctorio
This has proven inconvenient in so many cases. I'm sure we can disconnect the software when we aren't under exam conditions so I won't complain about the gross privacy violations at risk here, but rather I have comments on practicality. How do you adopt a system that you haven't even configured to suit all of the courses you provide? For example, quantitative skills. A large part of it is coordinate-based algebra that involves graphing.. Evrybody's gotta do it... yet... We can't even figure out how this is going to be examined on the program that won't allow us to draw on a grid. Are we going to create unfamiliar testing conditions to combine written work AND an online form because of this? Sounds like something students should get to know before they're halfway through the term-- and more importantly, something a professor should know before he designs his course. Maybe many teachers show support for this in staff meetings, but as students we have heard many complain about the change and it's far from encouraging.
I would prefer to do the test on paper, i might do something regrettable, which will result in me immediately failing.
I would like to have more privacy.
F- proctorial.
I disagree with having to look at my screen for so much time because looking at the roof or the window will be considered cheating. Also, limitations in the permissions that proctorio has should be implemented for me to be able to agree with it's use
I prefer having exams on paper. Looking at a screen for two hours can be exhausting.
I disagree with the idea that Hult makes me install a plugin (Proctorio) that will be reading, changing data in my computer.
Although Hult intend to use solely the chrome plug-in version i am concerned about my privacy. i'd rather do an exam with somebody constantly stare at me then compromise my own privacy (even temporarily).