The purest scientific method is forged in the mills of conflict, not the cradles of concensus.
A
Alex Knapp
10 years ago
http://www.purepma.com. John Joseph would be a better addition to the panel
D
David Whitten
10 years ago
Her book changed my life.
A
Alex Knapp
10 years ago
http://www.thedavisclinic.com/dr-garth-davis Dr Garth would be a much better addition to the panel
K
Kate Czajkowski
10 years ago
Let nutrition guidelines be based in facts rather than lobbying efforts
U
Urban
10 years ago
Put Nina Teicholz back on the Food Policy Panel
J
Jane Gasiorowski
10 years ago
Nina's advice is science-based and not biased by agri-business. Her participation on the panel is critical to the health of our nation.
T
Tina A Thompson
10 years ago
American Heart Association has been doing a disservice to America for too long thanks to the questionable research of one erogant but politically powerful man. AHA has actually been killing Americans as a result! Get off of your high horse and do what is morally right and listen to evidence showing that we as humans need to eat animal fats!!!
F
Frank Dunaway
10 years ago
She represents an important position and perspective of the nutritional world
A
Alex Knapp
10 years ago
Www.nutritionfacts.org. Whose science exactly?
R
Richard C McLaurin
10 years ago
Science first, not profit! Put Nina back on!
P
Pat Russell
10 years ago
A voice of reason.
C
Christopher Walker
10 years ago
Good science.
Z
Zakry Standerfer
10 years ago
Her voice should be on the panel. Don't silence her voice on healthy fats!
R
Rob Henderson
10 years ago
What is the USDA trying to hide by not letting her on the panel.
S
Susan Tenney
10 years ago
Nina Teicholz has breathed a breath of fresh air into the stagnant air of nutrition science. Her book highlights how powerful and charismatic personalities have kept nutrition science from remaining objective and accurate. Having her reinstated to the food policy panel would be a step in the direction of science over industry lobbying, facts over beliefs.
Reinstate!
The purest scientific method is forged in the mills of conflict, not the cradles of concensus.
http://www.purepma.com. John Joseph would be a better addition to the panel
Her book changed my life.
http://www.thedavisclinic.com/dr-garth-davis Dr Garth would be a much better addition to the panel
Let nutrition guidelines be based in facts rather than lobbying efforts
Put Nina Teicholz back on the Food Policy Panel
Nina's advice is science-based and not biased by agri-business. Her participation on the panel is critical to the health of our nation.
American Heart Association has been doing a disservice to America for too long thanks to the questionable research of one erogant but politically powerful man. AHA has actually been killing Americans as a result! Get off of your high horse and do what is morally right and listen to evidence showing that we as humans need to eat animal fats!!!
She represents an important position and perspective of the nutritional world
Www.nutritionfacts.org. Whose science exactly?
Science first, not profit! Put Nina back on!
A voice of reason.
Good science.
Her voice should be on the panel. Don't silence her voice on healthy fats!
What is the USDA trying to hide by not letting her on the panel.
Nina Teicholz has breathed a breath of fresh air into the stagnant air of nutrition science. Her book highlights how powerful and charismatic personalities have kept nutrition science from remaining objective and accurate. Having her reinstated to the food policy panel would be a step in the direction of science over industry lobbying, facts over beliefs.
Reinstate Nina Teicholz on the food policy panel!
Signing petition for Tina to be on panel
Reinstate Nina Teicholz!