Disgusting. Science should NEVER be beholden to industrial or political interest groups ... It's science ... Collect data...interpret...hypothesize...discuss/debate...repeat until fully understood...the FDA has created a health monster with its poor advice based on poorer science
P
Peggie Thomas
10 years ago
Dissent is fine.
L
Liz Tsirigoti
10 years ago
There are enough mainstream scientists now questioning long-held nutritional dogma that it's finally time to hear the debate. Let Nina Teicholz speak.
L
Larry
10 years ago
United States
M
Misty Garrett
10 years ago
I support this 100%
A
Alfredo Cardenas
10 years ago
Nina has done an enormous amount of research and work surrounding nutritional science. Her voice backed up by her deep knowledge on this subject should be heard on this panel.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Differing viewpoints need to be heard.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Do the right thing.
K
Kris
10 years ago
This country needs a huge change in diet and nutrition! There are so many blind Americans with misleading information these days and she absolutely deseverves to be on that panel sharing her knowledge so we can work at getting America healthy.
R
Randall Huff
10 years ago
By remving Nina, you're putting yet another nail in the coffin of your deceased credibility.
J
Jo Simmons
10 years ago
Please make sure that ALL voices are heard in something so important. Do you promote discrimination or is the Food Policy Panel simply afraid.
T
Tammy M Culp
10 years ago
Stop feeding us CRAPPOLA from your desire to finance the money hungry corps....feed us hungry for food People before we all become sick and dying corpses.
T
Tony McDonald
10 years ago
The food policy panel should use the opportunity of having Ms Teicholz present to show it is even-handed, and not run by industry interests.
E
Eric Anondson
10 years ago
The "no platforming" techniques discredit those stifling debate, but the people who promoted transfats in the 80s have a few more decades of apologizing before they deserve to have us forget it.
J
John L Ferri
10 years ago
Science should determine dietary recommendations.
J
Joan Loclwwood
10 years ago
We must respect science not vested interests.
M
Matthew Pearce
10 years ago
There is no place for stifling debate in science.
E
Earl S Bakken
10 years ago
Need industry out of the decision making g. Conflict of interest.
Disgusting. Science should NEVER be beholden to industrial or political interest groups ... It's science ... Collect data...interpret...hypothesize...discuss/debate...repeat until fully understood...the FDA has created a health monster with its poor advice based on poorer science
Dissent is fine.
There are enough mainstream scientists now questioning long-held nutritional dogma that it's finally time to hear the debate. Let Nina Teicholz speak.
United States
I support this 100%
Nina has done an enormous amount of research and work surrounding nutritional science. Her voice backed up by her deep knowledge on this subject should be heard on this panel.
Differing viewpoints need to be heard.
Do the right thing.
This country needs a huge change in diet and nutrition! There are so many blind Americans with misleading information these days and she absolutely deseverves to be on that panel sharing her knowledge so we can work at getting America healthy.
By remving Nina, you're putting yet another nail in the coffin of your deceased credibility.
Please make sure that ALL voices are heard in something so important. Do you promote discrimination or is the Food Policy Panel simply afraid.
Stop feeding us CRAPPOLA from your desire to finance the money hungry corps....feed us hungry for food People before we all become sick and dying corpses.
The food policy panel should use the opportunity of having Ms Teicholz present to show it is even-handed, and not run by industry interests.
The "no platforming" techniques discredit those stifling debate, but the people who promoted transfats in the 80s have a few more decades of apologizing before they deserve to have us forget it.
Science should determine dietary recommendations.
We must respect science not vested interests.
There is no place for stifling debate in science.
Need industry out of the decision making g. Conflict of interest.
Good science needs debate
Pls reinstate Nina