The best way for the anti-meat groups to get their point across, is to silence the other side.
C
Chris kinder
10 years ago
As many other Americans I am also fed up with government agendas . As a rancher I must keep my water clean or my livestock suffers , I must feed my family nutritious food or they suffer , and I am definitely not doing any of this for the money unlike so many who oppose our way of life . Please help Washington understand more regulation is not the answer . Thank you!
D
David Lawrence
10 years ago
Her un-invitation because if the petulance if other panellists is so farcical that its hard to see how any rational observer could think there's any legitimacy to it.
J
Jon Grunefelder
10 years ago
Its about time beef gets the credit it deserves in a balanced diet.
M
Marc Ciminelli
10 years ago
Go Nina Go!!!
Science over politics!!!
K
Kasey Woolam
10 years ago
Quit being afraid of a healthy conversation about nutrition.
R
Royalee Rhoads
10 years ago
Nina should be a part of this panel! It's sad that you are not willing to listen to a different opinion. Good luck Nina!!
J
John Hannah
10 years ago
Why should this surprise anyone given our current administration?
P
Phillip Smith
10 years ago
Nina All the best
J
June Sanchez
10 years ago
Reinstate!
N
Neil McNeill
10 years ago
After several decades of promoting more carbs and less protein and the ensuing growth of diabetes, why not let an alternative voice have a chance at some exposure. To stimulate conversation if nothing else.
D
Donna Troublefield
10 years ago
Reinstate
J
Jason Adams
10 years ago
J
Janet Lundy
10 years ago
What is wrong with our government when they put money before our health? Let us hear the truth! Reinstate her
B
Bas Leijdekkers
10 years ago
Science needs debate.
C
Charles C Wall III
10 years ago
I support Nina Teicholz, her voice should be heard at the Food Policy Panel.
T
Terry Spears
10 years ago
All sides are needed in a good conference. Let the moo be heard.
M
Marsha Mood
10 years ago
This is America, for heaven's sake.
C
Cade Trigg
10 years ago
If there's nothing to hide let her speak.
S
Sofia Monteiro
10 years ago
We have the right to hear the truth and banning people of her calibre denies us this right.
The best way for the anti-meat groups to get their point across, is to silence the other side.
As many other Americans I am also fed up with government agendas . As a rancher I must keep my water clean or my livestock suffers , I must feed my family nutritious food or they suffer , and I am definitely not doing any of this for the money unlike so many who oppose our way of life . Please help Washington understand more regulation is not the answer . Thank you!
Her un-invitation because if the petulance if other panellists is so farcical that its hard to see how any rational observer could think there's any legitimacy to it.
Its about time beef gets the credit it deserves in a balanced diet.
Go Nina Go!!! Science over politics!!!
Quit being afraid of a healthy conversation about nutrition.
Nina should be a part of this panel! It's sad that you are not willing to listen to a different opinion. Good luck Nina!!
Why should this surprise anyone given our current administration?
Nina All the best
Reinstate!
After several decades of promoting more carbs and less protein and the ensuing growth of diabetes, why not let an alternative voice have a chance at some exposure. To stimulate conversation if nothing else.
Reinstate
What is wrong with our government when they put money before our health? Let us hear the truth! Reinstate her
Science needs debate.
I support Nina Teicholz, her voice should be heard at the Food Policy Panel.
All sides are needed in a good conference. Let the moo be heard.
This is America, for heaven's sake.
If there's nothing to hide let her speak.
We have the right to hear the truth and banning people of her calibre denies us this right.