We the undersigned want the Guildford School of Acting and in turn The University of Surrey to reassess the grades of the Professional Development Files in line with the original criteria and guidance given to this years (2013) third year students. And to offer empirical evidence of this reassessment demonstrating consistency through the marking. Ensure that each student is given objective and detailed reasoning behind their grade in line with the original criteria.
This is important because it affects the overall degree mark of the graduating class of 2013 which in turn affects future career prospects.
The administration has acknowledged the petition and we are currently finalizing a formal request for a meeting with the department heads. We expect to present the collected concerns regarding the assessment discrepancies by the end of the week.
6 Comments
J
Jessica Castillo
13 years ago
Featured
ridiculous. my degree is my future and this has been handled very poorly by the uni.
D
David Klein
13 years ago
Featured
the criteria changed halfway through without us knowing and it shows. fix the grades.
E
Emily Herrera
13 years ago
Featured
so frustrated with how everything went down at the end of the year. please just do the job right.
S
Sarah Todd
13 years ago
Featured
The grading was totally unfair and inconsistent across the board. We worked way too hard for this nonsense.
M
Mark Sinclair
13 years ago
Featured
give us some answers. we deserve to know how these marks were decided when it contradicts everything we were told during the year.
T
Tom Barnes
13 years ago
Featured
need transparency now!! this affects our whole careers and they owe us a real explanation
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
Couldn't copy automatically. Long-press to copy:
Share directly
Status: Closed — this petition is no longer accepting signatures.
We the undersigned want the Guildford School of Acting and in turn The University of Surrey to reassess the grades of the Professional Development Files in line with the original criteria and guidance given to this years (2013) third year students. And to offer empirical evidence of this reassessment demonstrating consistency through the marking. Ensure that each student is given objective and detailed reasoning behind their grade in line with the original criteria.
This is important because it affects the overall degree mark of the graduating class of 2013 which in turn affects future career prospects.
The administration has acknowledged the petition and we are currently finalizing a formal request for a meeting with the department heads. We expect to present the collected concerns regarding the assessment discrepancies by the end of the week.
6 Comments
J
Jessica Castillo
13 years ago
Featured
ridiculous. my degree is my future and this has been handled very poorly by the uni.
D
David Klein
13 years ago
Featured
the criteria changed halfway through without us knowing and it shows. fix the grades.
E
Emily Herrera
13 years ago
Featured
so frustrated with how everything went down at the end of the year. please just do the job right.
S
Sarah Todd
13 years ago
Featured
The grading was totally unfair and inconsistent across the board. We worked way too hard for this nonsense.
M
Mark Sinclair
13 years ago
Featured
give us some answers. we deserve to know how these marks were decided when it contradicts everything we were told during the year.
T
Tom Barnes
13 years ago
Featured
need transparency now!! this affects our whole careers and they owe us a real explanation
ridiculous. my degree is my future and this has been handled very poorly by the uni.