This is very concerning for many reasons. First, traffic. There is already too much traffic on 544 and in the Wal Mart areas. I have children who ride their bikes regularly. Putting these buildings here will endanger them. Also, evacuation routes. We are already limited and adding that many residents--or anymore for that matter would be an endangerment to all residents including the new ones in the apartments. Opening the gates, or adding more infil/exfil points would put a lot of though traffic into the neighborhoods when traffic overflows on 544. From 17 Bypass to Business on 544 is already a congested area. Two, property values. Three, crime. More people equals more crime. Current residents here in Deerfield are mostly owners. With tenants and rentals, it is no secret to what comes with it. The current Deerfield community consist of many retired residents who purchased in this area for peace and quiet. Four, drainage and road issues. We already have too many roads that can barely be travelled. There are too many concerns in this area already. There are other places to build. Please, please reconsider.
J
jason minzler
7 years ago
1927 Candy Lane
C
Colin Mulqueen
7 years ago
1711 Gibson Avenue
Surfside Beach South Carolina
29575
A
Anonymous
7 years ago
2044 Lake View Circle
M
Michele Burke
7 years ago
1002 Plantation Drive
R
Robyn Boothe
7 years ago
1592 Bay Tree Ln. Our roads can't handle the requested rezoning. No to condos. Keep the Zoning as Single Family Homes.
H
Henry Groover
7 years ago
1637 Crooked Pine Drive
K
Kim Tuncy
7 years ago
1501 Bay Tree Lane
L
Linda Groover
7 years ago
1637 Crooked Pine Drive
M
Mary L Johnson
7 years ago
1919 Kate Lane
J
John Gnieski
7 years ago
715 Plantation Dr
J
John T Daurity
7 years ago
Featured
1601 Gibson Avenue
Our roads are maintained through our POA fees. How is it fair to us to add the traffic that 350+ multi unit apartments/condos will cause? They have an ingress/egress on Gibson Ave and our once quiet street will become a major highway. Please leave the zoning as is!
F
Faye Stutz
7 years ago
Featured
We were told, after a long legal hassle, that it would all be zoned R3. The flooding/drainage issues and traffic increase on roads not designed to handle it are reason enough Not to rezone. Greed should not win over the wellbeing of the current, many long-term residents. It is not the right thing to do.
Faye Stutz
C
Crow Team ROGD
7 years ago
Featured
We are AGAINST the current plans for more apartments to be built. This area should be used for better things for the community such as a park, pools or Market Common style shops to increase property values and make everyone's quality of life better in the community.
J
John Raisis
7 years ago
581 Circle Drive, Surfside Beach, SC
F
Fred spurlin
7 years ago
1944 Tree Circle
D
Donna Giblin
· petition starter
7 years ago
1908 Candy lane. The traffic is already out of control, please do not allow mult-unit buildings
L
Lona Flament
7 years ago
1950 Bent Grass Drive
Totally against the rezoning. The roads can’t handle the traffic now, this will add to an already huge problem.
A
Andrea Larson
7 years ago
Featured
1784 Crooked Pine Drive, Myrtle Beach, SC. I oppose additional multi-family housing. Addressing the drainage issues we have in this neighborhood first. Addressing the access in and out over our undedicated roads that have not met the base requirements of a county road. Adamantly say NO!
This is very concerning for many reasons. First, traffic. There is already too much traffic on 544 and in the Wal Mart areas. I have children who ride their bikes regularly. Putting these buildings here will endanger them. Also, evacuation routes. We are already limited and adding that many residents--or anymore for that matter would be an endangerment to all residents including the new ones in the apartments. Opening the gates, or adding more infil/exfil points would put a lot of though traffic into the neighborhoods when traffic overflows on 544. From 17 Bypass to Business on 544 is already a congested area. Two, property values. Three, crime. More people equals more crime. Current residents here in Deerfield are mostly owners. With tenants and rentals, it is no secret to what comes with it. The current Deerfield community consist of many retired residents who purchased in this area for peace and quiet. Four, drainage and road issues. We already have too many roads that can barely be travelled. There are too many concerns in this area already. There are other places to build. Please, please reconsider.
1927 Candy Lane
1711 Gibson Avenue Surfside Beach South Carolina 29575
2044 Lake View Circle
1002 Plantation Drive
1592 Bay Tree Ln. Our roads can't handle the requested rezoning. No to condos. Keep the Zoning as Single Family Homes.
1637 Crooked Pine Drive
1501 Bay Tree Lane
1637 Crooked Pine Drive
1919 Kate Lane
715 Plantation Dr
1601 Gibson Avenue Our roads are maintained through our POA fees. How is it fair to us to add the traffic that 350+ multi unit apartments/condos will cause? They have an ingress/egress on Gibson Ave and our once quiet street will become a major highway. Please leave the zoning as is!
We were told, after a long legal hassle, that it would all be zoned R3. The flooding/drainage issues and traffic increase on roads not designed to handle it are reason enough Not to rezone. Greed should not win over the wellbeing of the current, many long-term residents. It is not the right thing to do. Faye Stutz
We are AGAINST the current plans for more apartments to be built. This area should be used for better things for the community such as a park, pools or Market Common style shops to increase property values and make everyone's quality of life better in the community.
581 Circle Drive, Surfside Beach, SC
1944 Tree Circle
1908 Candy lane. The traffic is already out of control, please do not allow mult-unit buildings
1950 Bent Grass Drive Totally against the rezoning. The roads can’t handle the traffic now, this will add to an already huge problem.
1784 Crooked Pine Drive, Myrtle Beach, SC. I oppose additional multi-family housing. Addressing the drainage issues we have in this neighborhood first. Addressing the access in and out over our undedicated roads that have not met the base requirements of a county road. Adamantly say NO!
I do not want multiple family housing