RA Should Reinstate Jess's Work and Issue a Public Apology
325 Comments
S
Stephanie Roth
5 years ago
This artist is the victim of a hate campaign.
She sounds reasonable in her opinions about protecting girls and women's rights.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Jess De Wahls has been unfairly treated by the RA. Her position should be swiftly re-instated and an unreserved public apology given. Those responsible for the original decision should be disciplined.
M
MEENAKSHI NATH
5 years ago
Reinstate Jess De Wahl's work and issue a public apology. The RA has diminished itself by giving in to bullies.
P
Peter Carey
5 years ago
She said nothing transphobic, just stated a biological fact
A
Anne-Marie Timoney
5 years ago
I agree with her. I'm not trans phobic but I was born woman/female. That is not transphobic. It just is.
J
jane hutton
5 years ago
Disgusting sexism.
L
Lord Nicholas Wilson
5 years ago
I applaud the move of the pendulum to inclusivity and diversity but here it has swung far too far against ( reasonable) free speech.
R
Rita rake
5 years ago
The Royal Academy must have been aware of Jess’s views on gender ideology before stocking her work. This craven appeasement of a bullying mob is shameful and they should make a public apology to Jess
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
In the light of the Maya Forstater ruling it is clear this work should never have been removed. Jess deWahls has not made any statements that indicate a lack of respect for Trans individuals. Many women, feminists and rape survivors support the preservation of safe spaces for biological females. This is not an anti-trans stance rather it reflects the fact that predatory males will and already have exploited the opening up of women’s spaces to men fraudulently identifying as transwomen. Both women and trans men and women have a right to safe spaces. Women do have the right to voice concerns about this issue and a solution must be found which makes everyone feel safe.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
This ‘cancel’ culture, now sadly adopted by the RA, is damaging our society and people’s livelihoods.
B
Beverley Mason
5 years ago
Those behind the decision to ban Jess De Wahls need to take a good hard look at themselves and ask themselves who gave them the authority to do this.
C
Camilla P
5 years ago
So much for art allowing expression, freedom, cultural criticism. Of you censor artists for not agreeing with you is there even any point in art? Is there any point in you? Issue an artistic rebuttal if you disagree. No platforming is the cowards response.
J
Jana Hill
5 years ago
What a shameful act of cowardice and misogyny.
A
Anni Tracy
5 years ago
You chose to exhibit a woman doing womanist art. Thank you. Be brave enough to stick with your decision and not bullied out of it.
C
Camilla Hannan
5 years ago
The RA should be ashamed of themselves. Jess has just spoken common sense and truth and stood up for women.
R
Rachel
5 years ago
I can't believe that an organisation like yours caved into misogyny like this. Jess is very very talented, I've bought her goods in the past so well aware how beautiful, original her products are.
Also as am sure you are aware the Maya court case last week clearly clarified that the views that Jess has are protected by law.
What are you playing at!!
M
Mike Bostle
5 years ago
This action taken by the RA is total nonsense
C
Cheryl Young'
5 years ago
Art exists to challenge us and our thinking.
C
Christin Cockerton
5 years ago
The RA has behaved disgracefully - shame on them. Jess is a hugely talented and accomplished artist and deserves our support.
E
Eileen Gallagher OBE
5 years ago
I stand in support of Jess De Wahls and freedom of speech
This artist is the victim of a hate campaign. She sounds reasonable in her opinions about protecting girls and women's rights.
Jess De Wahls has been unfairly treated by the RA. Her position should be swiftly re-instated and an unreserved public apology given. Those responsible for the original decision should be disciplined.
Reinstate Jess De Wahl's work and issue a public apology. The RA has diminished itself by giving in to bullies.
She said nothing transphobic, just stated a biological fact
I agree with her. I'm not trans phobic but I was born woman/female. That is not transphobic. It just is.
Disgusting sexism.
I applaud the move of the pendulum to inclusivity and diversity but here it has swung far too far against ( reasonable) free speech.
The Royal Academy must have been aware of Jess’s views on gender ideology before stocking her work. This craven appeasement of a bullying mob is shameful and they should make a public apology to Jess
In the light of the Maya Forstater ruling it is clear this work should never have been removed. Jess deWahls has not made any statements that indicate a lack of respect for Trans individuals. Many women, feminists and rape survivors support the preservation of safe spaces for biological females. This is not an anti-trans stance rather it reflects the fact that predatory males will and already have exploited the opening up of women’s spaces to men fraudulently identifying as transwomen. Both women and trans men and women have a right to safe spaces. Women do have the right to voice concerns about this issue and a solution must be found which makes everyone feel safe.
This ‘cancel’ culture, now sadly adopted by the RA, is damaging our society and people’s livelihoods.
Those behind the decision to ban Jess De Wahls need to take a good hard look at themselves and ask themselves who gave them the authority to do this.
So much for art allowing expression, freedom, cultural criticism. Of you censor artists for not agreeing with you is there even any point in art? Is there any point in you? Issue an artistic rebuttal if you disagree. No platforming is the cowards response.
What a shameful act of cowardice and misogyny.
You chose to exhibit a woman doing womanist art. Thank you. Be brave enough to stick with your decision and not bullied out of it.
The RA should be ashamed of themselves. Jess has just spoken common sense and truth and stood up for women.
I can't believe that an organisation like yours caved into misogyny like this. Jess is very very talented, I've bought her goods in the past so well aware how beautiful, original her products are. Also as am sure you are aware the Maya court case last week clearly clarified that the views that Jess has are protected by law. What are you playing at!!
This action taken by the RA is total nonsense
Art exists to challenge us and our thinking.
The RA has behaved disgracefully - shame on them. Jess is a hugely talented and accomplished artist and deserves our support.
I stand in support of Jess De Wahls and freedom of speech